JB/036/083/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/036/083/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/036/083/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/036/083/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/036/083/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1822 Feb 6 &amp; 18<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Codification Offer</head></p>
 
<p>Reasons for not giving to Members <add>of the legislative body</add> the exclusive faculty<lb/>
 
of giving in original draughts in this extraordinary case as in<lb/>
 
all ordinary <del>II. Members unapt</del> cases has been hitherto everywhere<lb/>
the practice.</p>
<p><del>But, it may be noticed, why not <add>to the Constituted <gap/> service</add> leave to the legislative body<lb/>
and to that <add>them</add> alone, the function of preparing the original<lb/>
draught, as well as that of applying amendments to it,<lb/>
and finally, according to the nature of the constitution exercising<lb/>
the power or sanctions in the power, of sanctioning it?</del></p>
<p><add><del>I answer <gap/> for two reasons:</del></add> 1.  Reason 1.  They have no <unclear>time</unclear> applicable to it.</p>
<p><del><gap/>.</del> The composition of <del>an all com</del> a body of law,<lb/>
which is to be at the same time all-comprehensive, and <del>by<lb/>
that</del> <add>on every point, by</add> means of perpetually interwoven rationale <del>rationalized</del> <add><gap/> and explained</add><lb/>
<del>in</del> <add>presents</add> of itself <del>fully adequate</del> an irresistible demand for the whole<lb/>
quantity of <del>working</del> <add>applicable</add> time at the disposal of <del>every</del> <add>whatsoever</add> individual<lb/>
may be engaged <del>by</del> <add>in</add> it:  <add>if so, then,</add> in the case of <del>a man may<lb/>
<gap/></del> every individual <del>been</del> possessing any <del>portion</del> share <del>in</del> the<lb/>
aggregate of legislative power, <add>if any part of his time be employed upon the work, the consequence is – that</add> either the ordinary function<lb/>
called, <add>or liable to be called,</add> continually into exercise by the exigencies of the day,<lb/>
or <del>this</del> else this extraordinary function, or <add>both</add> the one and the<lb/>
other, will of necessity be neglected.</p>
<p><add><del>True it is, that as to the exclusion here proposed</del></add> In the practical result of this reason, is <del>included</del> <add>comprized</add> (it<lb/>
<del>will</del> <add>may</add> be served) <del>the</del> <add>an</add> exclusion <del>of</del> <add>put upon</add> the Members of the legislative<lb/>
body, <del>from</del> <add>as to</add> the function of drawing up any such draught.  <del>It</del> It<lb/>
<del>In regard to applies not however</del> <add>applies not</add> to the <hi rend="underline">persons</hi> – this exclusion – it applies only to the <hi rend="underline">time</hi>:  and as to time, it<lb/>
<del>As to time however, it has no application</del> applies not to any<lb/>
<del>other</del> portion <add>other</add> than that which by the engagement stands<lb/>
<del>attached</del> <add>appropriated</add> to the ordinary duties of <del>that</del> <add>such their</add> situation.  It applies<lb/>
not to the exclusion of any draught already prepared by<lb/>
any Member <del>at <gap/></del> antecedently to the <del>time at</del> <add>day on</add> which the<lb/>
<del>general</del> <add><del>proposed</del> all comprehensive</add> resolution <del>is go promulgated</del> <add>shall have been</add> resolved upon:  it applies<lb/>
not to any portion of time subsequent to that during which his<lb/>
exercise of those same ordinary functions <add>is</add> contained:  it <del>throws</del> <add>is</add> therefore<lb/>
no bar to his entering immediately <del>upon</del> after <del>that</del> such resolution, upon the<lb/>
task of <del>drawi</del> penning<lb/>
such a draught, <del>of an</del><lb/>
<add>provided that on</add> that occasion he vacates<lb/>
his seat.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:24, 12 June 2023

Click Here To Edit

1822 Feb 6 & 18
Codification Offer

Reasons for not giving to Members of the legislative body the exclusive faculty
of giving in original draughts in this extraordinary case as in
all ordinary II. Members unapt cases has been hitherto everywhere
the practice.

But, it may be noticed, why not to the Constituted service leave to the legislative body
and to that them alone, the function of preparing the original
draught, as well as that of applying amendments to it,
and finally, according to the nature of the constitution exercising
the power or sanctions in the power, of sanctioning it?

I answer for two reasons: 1. Reason 1. They have no time applicable to it.

. The composition of an all com a body of law,
which is to be at the same time all-comprehensive, and by
that
on every point, by means of perpetually interwoven rationale rationalized and explained
in presents of itself fully adequate an irresistible demand for the whole
quantity of working applicable time at the disposal of every whatsoever individual
may be engaged by in it: if so, then, in the case of a man may
every individual been possessing any portion share in the
aggregate of legislative power, if any part of his time be employed upon the work, the consequence is – that either the ordinary function
called, or liable to be called, continually into exercise by the exigencies of the day,
or this else this extraordinary function, or both the one and the
other, will of necessity be neglected.

True it is, that as to the exclusion here proposed In the practical result of this reason, is included comprized (it
will may be served) the an exclusion of put upon the Members of the legislative
body, from as to the function of drawing up any such draught. It It
In regard to applies not however applies not to the persons – this exclusion – it applies only to the time: and as to time, it
As to time however, it has no application applies not to any
other portion other than that which by the engagement stands
attached appropriated to the ordinary duties of that such their situation. It applies
not to the exclusion of any draught already prepared by
any Member at antecedently to the time at day on which the
general proposed all comprehensive resolution is go promulgated shall have been resolved upon: it applies
not to any portion of time subsequent to that during which his
exercise of those same ordinary functions is contained: it throws is therefore
no bar to his entering immediately upon after that such resolution, upon the
task of drawi penning
such a draught, of an
provided that on that occasion he vacates
his seat.


Identifier: | JB/036/083/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 36.

Date_1

1822-07-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

9-11

Box

036

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

083

Info in main headings field

constitut. code

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b4 / c1 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

11007

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in