JB/009/026/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/009/026/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
conquest a conquest from the French.  I don't like it<lb/>
conquest a conquest from the French.  I don't like it<lb/>
in the first place because tho the forty days tyranny was<lb/>
in the first place because tho the forty days tyranny was<lb/>
a transaction very properly brought to the <gap/> of<lb/>
a transaction very properly brought to the <unclear>wildest</unclear> of<lb/>
those to whom you are ab<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> to show that the Constit<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> has<lb/>
those to whom you are ab<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> to show that the Constit<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> has<lb/>
been since isolated in more important points without any<lb/>
been since isolated in more important points without any<lb/>
Line 17: Line 17:
<unclear>Wars</unclear> of 1767 or of <del>Bo</del> <gap/> <gap/> at Botany bay.  The<lb/>
<unclear>Wars</unclear> of 1767 or of <del>Bo</del> <gap/> <gap/> at Botany bay.  The<lb/>
truth is that notwithst<hi rend="superscript">g</hi> what has been done at Botany<lb/>
truth is that notwithst<hi rend="superscript">g</hi> what has been done at Botany<lb/>
bay the <gap/> Constit<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> is not conquered but still remains</p>
bay the <unclear>Brit</unclear> Constit<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> is not conquered but still remains</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:54, 28 June 2023

Click Here To Edit

was long out at anterior in time to the projected conquest of
America the net to 2d. (Latham's speech which you
allude to & which sep related to a different kind of
conquest a conquest from the French. I don't like it
in the first place because tho the forty days tyranny was
a transaction very properly brought to the wildest of
those to whom you are abt. to show that the Constitn has
been since isolated in more important points without any
attention being pd. to it yet their 40 days tyranny is
not to be compared in any point of view with the
American War & in the next place I don't like it but:
the word conquest is applied in its litteral sense to
America but is a metaphor when used either of the
Wars of 1767 or of Bo at Botany bay. The
truth is that notwithstg what has been done at Botany
bay the Brit Constitn is not conquered but still remains




Identifier: | JB/009/026/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 9.

Date_1

1803-02-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

009

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

026

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

samuel romilly

Watermarks

g stafford 1801

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1801

Notes public

letter 1790, vol. 7; also printed in bowring, xi, 144

ID Number

3327

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in