JB/081/106/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/106/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1829 March 23<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>Supplement</note><lb/>12 <note>&sect;. 3 Suits in pendency</note></p> <p><note>31<lb/>As to qualification<lb/>Peel's the <sic>mandicatory</sic><lb/>Choice would be preferable<lb/>but rather<lb/>have regard to the<lb/><sic>mandicatory</sic> qualification<lb/>those that<lb/>the work should<lb/>not be done</note></p> <p>As to qualification, what every body hears though, as it should<lb/>seem nobody choses to appear to hear is that by a certain<lb/>three <gap/> for a Lord <gap/> the qualification<lb?>denominate the <add>which has been <gap/> to</add> <gap/> was the <gap/> qualification thought fit<lb/>to be required: a hundred <gap/> cut in another of for great <add><gap/></add> <lb/>holes and between the day of the last chance and the day of the<lb/><gap/> in question one interval no <gap/> been employed,<lb/>if not less than three years.  Was the <gap/> to <gap/> upon not<lb/>Chance I must confess <del>i <gap/></del> as to <gap/> I should employ <add>to what <gap/> I</add><lb/>should consent to mention</add> the preference to Choice <gap/> to my head by which such<lb/>qualification could have been established under the rules of its<lb/>being an apt one.  But in no such <del>page</del> <add><add><gap/> or <gap/></add> one myself would<lb/>would the power be <gap/>: and the <gap/> I say though only<lb/>to Chance <del>would d</del> this my preference would be given, yet rather<lb/>than the thing should not be done <add>at all by</add> other men in such hands<lb/>let it be done.</p> <p><note>32<lb/>One course would<lb/>be to take the members<lb/> of the <del><gap/></del> three<lb/>law Commissions</note></p> <p>One course would be to take for the Commissioners the learned<lb/>gentlemen who have been out of them a part of the three Commissions<lb/>which for the <add> <gap/> a <gap/></add> purpose to <gap/> not requiring him of <gap/> <gap/><lb/>been employed.  To this <gap/> at any rate no objection could<lb/>naturally be to be apportioned at the hands of the public by whom<lb/>they were respectively appointed.</p> <p><note>33<lb/>Included among them<lb/>the late Chancellor<lb/>&#x2014; Rather he <del>in the</del><lb/>with Indicators full<lb/>in view than that the<lb/>plan should not be<lb/>carried into effect</note></p> <p>Included in the description would be the late Chancellor<lb/>and with the <gap/> already <gap/> by me under the title of<lb/><gap/> respecting <gap/> in need, rather in the hands of the<lb/>public would I see this person than that the measure here proposed<lb/>should not be adopted and carried into effect.  if it deter <add>if by the <gap/> of</add><lb/><del><gap/></del> of its <gap/> a <gap/> <gap/> it is not in the <gap/><lb/>of <gap/> to furnish.  The <gap/> made by that <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>should cut open the preference to Chance!</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 11:49, 30 June 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 March 23
Petitions

Supplement
12 §. 3 Suits in pendency

31
As to qualification
Peel's the mandicatory
Choice would be preferable
but rather
have regard to the
mandicatory qualification
those that
the work should
not be done

As to qualification, what every body hears though, as it should
seem nobody choses to appear to hear is that by a certain
three for a Lord the qualification<lb?>denominate the which has been to was the qualification thought fit
to be required: a hundred cut in another of for great
holes and between the day of the last chance and the day of the
in question one interval no been employed,
if not less than three years. Was the to upon not
Chance I must confess i as to I should employ to what I
should consent to mention</add> the preference to Choice to my head by which such
qualification could have been established under the rules of its
being an apt one. But in no such page <add> or one myself would
would the power be : and the I say though only
to Chance would d this my preference would be given, yet rather
than the thing should not be done at all by other men in such hands
let it be done.

32
One course would
be to take the members
of the three
law Commissions

One course would be to take for the Commissioners the learned
gentlemen who have been out of them a part of the three Commissions
which for the a purpose to not requiring him of
been employed. To this at any rate no objection could
naturally be to be apportioned at the hands of the public by whom
they were respectively appointed.

33
Included among them
the late Chancellor
— Rather he in the
with Indicators full
in view than that the
plan should not be
carried into effect

Included in the description would be the late Chancellor
and with the already by me under the title of
respecting in need, rather in the hands of the
public would I see this person than that the measure here proposed
should not be adopted and carried into effect. if it deter if by the of
of its a it is not in the
of to furnish. The made by that
should cut open the preference to Chance!




Identifier: | JB/081/106/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-03-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

31-33

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

106

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25893

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in