★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/141/010/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/141/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>6<lb/> | |||
' | B.1. Ch.5.</p> | ||
<p>Rule 3. <hi rend="underline">When two Offences come in competition<lb/> | |||
the punishment for the greater Offence must be<lb/> | |||
sufficient to induce a man to prefer the less.</hi></p> | |||
<p>Two Offences may be said to be in<lb/> | |||
competition, when it is in the power of an individual<lb/> | |||
to commit both. When thieves break into a house<lb/> | |||
they may execute their purpose in different manners<lb/> | |||
by simply stealing, by theft accompanied with<lb/> | |||
bodily injury, or murder, or incendiarism. If the<lb/> | |||
punishment is the same for simple theft, as for<lb/> | |||
theft and murder you give the thieves a motive<lb/> | |||
for | |||
committing murder, because this crime adds to<lb/> | |||
<del>the facility of committs his</del> <add>the facility of committing the former & the</add> chance of impunity<lb/> | |||
<del>and t</del> when it is committed.</p> | |||
<p><del>This rule would be <add>perfectly</add> observed if for every<lb/> | |||
portion of mischief a corresponding portion of punishment<lb/> | |||
were appointed. If the thief who steals 10 Crowns<lb/> | |||
is not punished more than he would steals only five<lb/> | |||
crowns, the stealing of the last five crowns is an<lb/> | |||
unpunished offence. –</del></p> | |||
<p>One great inconvenience <del>of inflicting</del> <add>resulting from the infliction of</add> great<lb/> | |||
punishments for small offences, is that the power<lb/> | |||
of increasing them in proportion to the <add>magnitude of the</add> offence is thereby lost.<hi rend="superscript">(1)</hi></p> | |||
<p>(1) Montesquieu, after having recommended this rule of<lb/> | |||
proportion adds – "<foreign>Quand il n'y a point de difference dans<lb/> | |||
"la peine, il faut en mettre, dans l’esperance de la grâce; en<lb/> "Angleterre, on n’assassine point (il auroit du dire <hi rend="underline">peu</hi>), parce<lb/> | |||
"que les voleurs peuvent esperer d être transportés dans les<lb/> | |||
"colonies, non pas les assassines.</foreign>" <hi rend="underline">Esprit des Lois</hi> , <gap/> VI. Ch. XVI.</p> | |||
<p>This expectation of favour, no doubt, contributes to the effect<lb/> | |||
of which he speaks, but why should this manifest imperfection<lb/> | |||
in the laws remain, that it may be corrected by an arbitrary act<lb/> | |||
of the sovereign? – If an uncertain <del>fa</del> advantage produces this<lb/> | |||
measure of good, a certain advantage would operate more<lb/> | |||
surely.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
6
B.1. Ch.5.
Rule 3. When two Offences come in competition
the punishment for the greater Offence must be
sufficient to induce a man to prefer the less.
Two Offences may be said to be in
competition, when it is in the power of an individual
to commit both. When thieves break into a house
they may execute their purpose in different manners
by simply stealing, by theft accompanied with
bodily injury, or murder, or incendiarism. If the
punishment is the same for simple theft, as for
theft and murder you give the thieves a motive
for
committing murder, because this crime adds to
the facility of committs his the facility of committing the former & the chance of impunity
and t when it is committed.
This rule would be perfectly observed if for every
portion of mischief a corresponding portion of punishment
were appointed. If the thief who steals 10 Crowns
is not punished more than he would steals only five
crowns, the stealing of the last five crowns is an
unpunished offence. –
One great inconvenience of inflicting resulting from the infliction of great
punishments for small offences, is that the power
of increasing them in proportion to the magnitude of the offence is thereby lost.(1)
(1) Montesquieu, after having recommended this rule of
proportion adds – "Quand il n'y a point de difference dans
"la peine, il faut en mettre, dans l’esperance de la grâce; en
"Angleterre, on n’assassine point (il auroit du dire peu), parce
"que les voleurs peuvent esperer d être transportés dans les
"colonies, non pas les assassines." Esprit des Lois , VI. Ch. XVI.
This expectation of favour, no doubt, contributes to the effect
of which he speaks, but why should this manifest imperfection
in the laws remain, that it may be corrected by an arbitrary act
of the sovereign? – If an uncertain fa advantage produces this
measure of good, a certain advantage would operate more
surely.
Identifier: | JB/141/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
141 |
rationale of punishment |
||
010 |
|||
001 |
rule 3 |
||
copy/fair copy sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
f6 / f3 |
||
richard smith |
[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
48227 |
|||