JB/141/028/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/141/028/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/028/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/028/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->6<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
B.1. Ch.6.</p>
 
<p><head>IV  <hi rend="underline">Characteristicalness or Analogy</hi>*</head><lb/>
 
<note>* To this <add><gap/></add> subject, on account of the importance, a separate Chapter is allotted.  See the next Chapter.</note></p>
 
<p>Punishment <del>cannot act any further than the</del> <add>as a preventative, is inefficacious except in <del>as far</del></add><lb/>
as far as the idea of it, &amp; of its connection with<lb/>
the offence, is present in the mind.  The idea<lb/>
of it, if not present cannot act at all;  &amp;<lb/>
then the punishment <del>itself must be <hi rend="underline">inefficacious</hi></del> <add>in this character is altogether nugatory.</add><lb/>
Now, to be present <add>to the mind</add> it must be remembered, and to<lb/>
be remembered it must have been learnt.  <del>But of</del><lb/>
<add>Of</add> al punishments that can be imagined, there are<lb/>
none of which the connection with the offence<lb/>
is either so easily learnt, or so <del>efficaciously</del> <add>certainly</add><lb/>
remembered, as those <del>of</del> which the idea is<lb/>
already in fact associated with <del><gap/></del> the<lb/>
idea of the offence, <del>which is the case</del> <add>as for example, <del>whe</del></add> where the<lb/>
<del>a <gap/> other</del> <add>crime &amp; the punishment</add> have some circumstance belonging<lb/>
to them in common.  Where this is the case the<lb/>
punishment is <hi rend="underline">analogous</hi> <add>to</add> or <hi rend="underline">characteristic</hi> of<lb/>
the offence.</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">Retaliation</hi> would, it is obvious, in this <del>respect</del> <add>property</add><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>be superior to</add> all other mode of punishment but<lb/>
from its <del>unequalled was</del> defect in respect of<lb/>
equability &amp; frugality the instances in which, if<lb/>
at all it is capable of being <add>advantageously</add> employed <del>with<lb/>
advantage</del> are reduced <del>when</del> within a very<lb/>
narrow compass.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:35, 12 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

6
B.1. Ch.6.

IV Characteristicalness or Analogy*
* To this subject, on account of the importance, a separate Chapter is allotted. See the next Chapter.

Punishment cannot act any further than the as a preventative, is inefficacious except in as far
as far as the idea of it, & of its connection with
the offence, is present in the mind. The idea
of it, if not present cannot act at all; &
then the punishment itself must be inefficacious in this character is altogether nugatory.
Now, to be present to the mind it must be remembered, and to
be remembered it must have been learnt. But of
Of al punishments that can be imagined, there are
none of which the connection with the offence
is either so easily learnt, or so efficaciously certainly
remembered, as those of which the idea is
already in fact associated with the
idea of the offence, which is the case as for example, whe where the
a other crime & the punishment have some circumstance belonging
to them in common. Where this is the case the
punishment is analogous to or characteristic of
the offence.

Retaliation would, it is obvious, in this respect property
be superior to all other mode of punishment but
from its unequalled was defect in respect of
equability & frugality the instances in which, if
at all it is capable of being advantageously employed with
advantage
are reduced when within a very
narrow compass.


Identifier: | JB/141/028/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

028

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

11 simplicity of description / 12 remissibility

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f5 / f14 / f6

Penner

richard smith

Watermarks

[[watermarks::dusautoy & rump 1809 [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

edward collins

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

48245

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in