JB/141/044/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/044/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/044/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/044/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->6<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
B.1 Ch.9<lb/>
 
<note>Popularity</note></p>
 
<p><head>IV  Humanity</head>  Attend not to the sophistries of reason<lb/>
 
which often deceive, but be governed by<lb/>
<del>IV  <hi rend="underline">Humanity</hi> "Listen not to the <add>given</add> voice of reason which<lb/>
so often misleads us; <add>that <gap/> <gap/></add>  but to the heart that faithful<lb/>
&amp; unerring guide, the heart</del> <add>your hearts which will always lead your right.</add>  I reject without<lb/>
<add><del><gap/></del></add> <hi rend="underline">hesitation</hi> the punishment you propose, <del>because</del><lb/>
it violates <del>the</del> natural feelings, it <del>laments</del> <add>narrows up</add> the<lb/>
susceptible <del>mind</del> mind, it is tyrannical and<lb/>
cruel."  <del>This is the sort of</del> <add>Such is the <del>argument</del></add> language <del>we <gap/> may <add>in question</add></del><lb/>
<add>of your</add> sentimental orators.</p>
<p><del>Last What is clear however that is that if</del> <add>But abolish any one penal law merely</add><lb/>
<del>the being</del> <add>because it is</add> repugnant to the feelings of a humane<lb/>
head, &amp; <del>be a sufficient objection against a penal<lb/>
law, the whole penal Code must be abolished at</del> <add>if consistent you abolish the whole penal Code</add><lb/>
<del>a stroke.  Is there any one the</del> <add>There is not one</add> of its provisions<lb/>
that does not in <del>a <add>a greater or less</add> &amp; greater some degree perceive<lb/>
of a painful shock to the sensible</del> <add>a more or less painful degree <del><gap/></del> would <del>be</del> the</add> sensibility.</p>
<p>All punishment is in itself necessarily <add><gap/></add> odious.<lb/>
<del>If is such even not averse to it, would it be<lb/>
calculated to attain its objec? be the mode of<lb/>
punishment can be approved of that <add>in as far as it</add> is not associated<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">with</hi> the idea of the offence.</del><lb/>
<note>If it were not dreaded it would<lb/>
not effect its purpose.  It<lb/>
can never be contemplated with<lb/>
approbation but when considered<lb/>
<del>as deserved by</del> <add>in connection with the prevention of</add> the crime<lb/>
against which it is denounced.</note></p>
<p>I reject the Sentiment as <del>a</del> <add>an absolute</add> Judge – <del>As a monitor<lb/>
it may not be altogether without  <gap/> it in <gap/>
subordination to reason it may be of the</del> <add>but under the controul of reason it may</add> not be a<lb/>
<del>altogether without <add>its</add> use.  If any</del> <add>useless monitor.  When a</add> penal dispensation<lb/>
<del>happens to be</del> <add>is</add> revolting to the <add>public</add> feeling<del>s</del>, this is not<lb/>
of itself a sufficient reason for <del>passing condemnation<lb/>
upon it</del> <add>rejecting it</add>, but it is a reason for subjecting it to<lb/>
a rigorous scrutiny.  If it deserves the antipathy<lb/>
<del>that it felt, as shall ready readily the rational</del> <add>it excites, the causes of that antipathy <del>will not</del> may be</add><lb/>
<del>proved.</del> <add><del>difficult to detect</del> easily detected.</add>  We shall find that the punishment<lb/>
in question is misscaled or superfluous, or<lb/>
disproportionate to the offence, or that it had a<lb/>
tendency to produce <del>preponderant evils.</del> <add>more mischief than it prevented.</add>  By<lb/>
this means we <del>shall</del> arrive at the<del>ir</del> seat of the error<lb/>
<del>Sentiment <add>gives <gap/> to</add> greater pleasure to <gap/></del> <add>Sentiment excites to reflection,</add> and reflection detects<lb/>
the impropriety <del>the vides</del> of the law.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 19:26, 12 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

6
B.1 Ch.9
Popularity

IV Humanity Attend not to the sophistries of reason
which often deceive, but be governed by
IV Humanity "Listen not to the given voice of reason which
so often misleads us; that but to the heart that faithful
& unerring guide, the heart
your hearts which will always lead your right. I reject without
hesitation the punishment you propose, because
it violates the natural feelings, it laments narrows up the
susceptible mind mind, it is tyrannical and
cruel." This is the sort of Such is the argument language we may in question
of your sentimental orators.

Last What is clear however that is that if But abolish any one penal law merely
the being because it is repugnant to the feelings of a humane
head, & be a sufficient objection against a penal
law, the whole penal Code must be abolished at
if consistent you abolish the whole penal Code
a stroke. Is there any one the There is not one of its provisions
that does not in a a greater or less & greater some degree perceive
of a painful shock to the sensible
a more or less painful degree would be the sensibility.

All punishment is in itself necessarily odious.
If is such even not averse to it, would it be
calculated to attain its objec? be the mode of
punishment can be approved of that in as far as it is not associated
with the idea of the offence.

If it were not dreaded it would
not effect its purpose. It
can never be contemplated with
approbation but when considered
as deserved by in connection with the prevention of the crime
against which it is denounced.

I reject the Sentiment as a an absolute Judge – As a monitor
it may not be altogether without it in subordination to reason it may be of the
but under the controul of reason it may not be a
altogether without its use. If any useless monitor. When a penal dispensation
happens to be is revolting to the public feelings, this is not
of itself a sufficient reason for passing condemnation
upon it
rejecting it, but it is a reason for subjecting it to
a rigorous scrutiny. If it deserves the antipathy
that it felt, as shall ready readily the rational it excites, the causes of that antipathy will not may be
proved. difficult to detect easily detected. We shall find that the punishment
in question is misscaled or superfluous, or
disproportionate to the offence, or that it had a
tendency to produce preponderant evils. more mischief than it prevented. By
this means we shall arrive at their seat of the error
Sentiment gives to greater pleasure to Sentiment excites to reflection, and reflection detects
the impropriety the vides of the law.


Identifier: | JB/141/044/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

044

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

3

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f6 / / f7 /

Penner

richard smith

Watermarks

[[watermarks::dusautoy & rump 1809 [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

edward collins

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

48261

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in