JB/141/107/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/141/107/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/107/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/107/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>12.</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>C<lb/>
 
<head>Forfeiture of Reputation.</head></p>
 
<p>leads us to enquire into the different measures of infamy<lb/>
 
that stand naturally annext to the several modes of punishment;<lb/>
and in the course of this enquiry we shall<lb/>
find reason to distinguish certain punishments from the<lb/>
rest by the special epithet of <del>infamous, ignominious</del> <add>infamous.</add></p>
<p>A certain degree of infamy or disrepute we have<lb/>
already remarked is what necessarily attends on every<lb/>
kind of political punishment.  But there are some that<lb/>
reflect a much larger portion of infamy than others.<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi>  These<lb/>
therefore it is plain are the only ones which can be stated<lb/>
properly by that name.<lb/>
<add>Upon</add></p>
<p><head>Note.</head></p>
<p><hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi>  Aware of this circumstance, the Roman Lawyers have<lb/>
taken a distinction between the <hi rend="underline">infamia facti</hi> and the <hi rend="underline">infamia<lb/>
juris</hi>:  the natural Infamy resulting from the offence,<lb/>
and the artificial infamy produced through the means of<lb/>
the punishment by the Law.  See Heinecc:  Elementa Jur. Civil:<lb/>
Pand. L.3. Tit.2. &sect;.399 whose explanation however is not<lb/>
very precise.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 21:22, 12 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

12.

C
Forfeiture of Reputation.

leads us to enquire into the different measures of infamy
that stand naturally annext to the several modes of punishment;
and in the course of this enquiry we shall
find reason to distinguish certain punishments from the
rest by the special epithet of infamous, ignominious infamous.

A certain degree of infamy or disrepute we have
already remarked is what necessarily attends on every
kind of political punishment. But there are some that
reflect a much larger portion of infamy than others.(a) These
therefore it is plain are the only ones which can be stated
properly by that name.
Upon

Note.

(a) Aware of this circumstance, the Roman Lawyers have
taken a distinction between the infamia facti and the infamia
juris
: the natural Infamy resulting from the offence,
and the artificial infamy produced through the means of
the punishment by the Law. See Heinecc: Elementa Jur. Civil:
Pand. L.3. Tit.2. §.399 whose explanation however is not
very precise.


Identifier: | JB/141/107/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

14

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

107

Info in main headings field

forfeiture of reputation

Image

004

Titles

note

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14

Penner

Watermarks

myears

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48324

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in