JB/141/115/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/141/115/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/115/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/141/115/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>15</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Infamy.</head></p>
 
<p>other than that which is given above.</p>
 
<p>Now then so it is, that for a libel simply vituperative<lb/>
 
<add>against a private person</add>, the law will not let a man be punished<lb/>
<add>by what is called an Action</add> to the profit of the party, unless it be under particular<lb/>
circumstances, which it is not here the place<lb/>
to dwell upon: <del>such as</del>  But <del>at the <gap/></del> <add>by imprisonment,</add> or to<lb/>
the profit of the Crown, by what is called an<lb/>
Indictment, or more especially what is called<lb/>
an Information, it will let him be punished<lb/>
at the caprice, (for no rules are or can be laid<lb/>
down to guide <add><del>fix</del></add> discretion) at the caprice, I say,<lb/>
<add>and fancy</add> of the Judges.  For a libel of the criminative<lb/>
kind <add>against a private person</add> the Law will not let a man be punished,<lb/>
if the libeller can prove his charge to be a true<lb/>
one.  But for a libel against a man in power<lb/>
criminative or vituperative, true or false, moderate<lb/>
or immoderate, it makes a man punishable<lb/>
<add>at all events</add> without distinction.  If it be true, it is so much<lb/>
the worse;  Judges, thinking to confound reasoning<lb/>
by paradox, have not <del><gap/></del> scrupled to hazard<lb/>
this atrocious absurdity.  <del>Antient <add>Antient departed</add></del> The Judges of antiquity<lb/>
broached it long ago;  <del>succeeded</del> <add>succeeding</add> Judges<lb/>
have adhered to it;  present Judges whose <del>agents</del> <add>discernment</add><lb/>
cannot but have detected it, present Judges <del>have</del> <add>as if <del>tied</del> borne</add><lb/>
<del>a way by a torrent of authorities</del> <add>down by the <del>unsurmountable</del> irresistible <del>torrent</del> weight</add> of authorities,<lb/>
recognize it;  and it triumphs <del>at this day</del> <add>to this hour.</add><hi rend="superscript"><del>⊞</del> (a)</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript"><del>⊞</del> (a)</hi> In <gap/> 27V The case of a regular accusation in a Court of Justice from the only receptor.</note></p>
<p>This being the case, he who blames the proceedings<lb/>
of a man in power, <del>right or wrong</del> <add>justly or unjustly</add>, is a libeller:  the<lb/>
more justly, the worse libeller.  But for blaming the<lb/>
<add>proceedings</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 21:36, 12 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

15

Infamy.

other than that which is given above.

Now then so it is, that for a libel simply vituperative
against a private person, the law will not let a man be punished
by what is called an Action to the profit of the party, unless it be under particular
circumstances, which it is not here the place
to dwell upon: such as But at the by imprisonment, or to
the profit of the Crown, by what is called an
Indictment, or more especially what is called
an Information, it will let him be punished
at the caprice, (for no rules are or can be laid
down to guide fix discretion) at the caprice, I say,
and fancy of the Judges. For a libel of the criminative
kind against a private person the Law will not let a man be punished,
if the libeller can prove his charge to be a true
one. But for a libel against a man in power
criminative or vituperative, true or false, moderate
or immoderate, it makes a man punishable
at all events without distinction. If it be true, it is so much
the worse; Judges, thinking to confound reasoning
by paradox, have not scrupled to hazard
this atrocious absurdity. Antient Antient departed The Judges of antiquity
broached it long ago; succeeded succeeding Judges
have adhered to it; present Judges whose agents discernment
cannot but have detected it, present Judges have as if tied borne
a way by a torrent of authorities down by the unsurmountable irresistible torrent weight of authorities,
recognize it; and it triumphs at this day to this hour. (a) (a) In 27V The case of a regular accusation in a Court of Justice from the only receptor.

This being the case, he who blames the proceedings
of a man in power, right or wrong justly or unjustly, is a libeller: the
more justly, the worse libeller. But for blaming the
proceedings


Identifier: | JB/141/115/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

115

Info in main headings field

infamy

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f12 / f13 / f14 / f15

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48332

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in