JB/029/010/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/029/010/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/029/010/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/029/010/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>Dr. Privé – Brouillon – Succession by Settlement</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><note>See Consentement Ch. 3.</note></p>
 
<p>Inalienability<lb/><lb/>
 
by Settlement<lb/>
 
I.  in person<lb/>
1.  Whether<del>?</del> – in<lb/>
any case?<lb/>
2.  In what cases<lb/>
3.  For how many<lb/>
steps?<lb/>
4.  For what length<lb/>
of time?</p>
<p>Wife's Jointure<lb/>
after death of<lb/>
Husband?<lb/>
2.  Wife's separate<lb/>
maintenance during<lb/>
life of husband?</p>
<pb/>
<p>Reasons pro –<lb/>
1.  Precaution against<lb/>
prodigality<lb/>
2.  Precaution against<lb/>
disappointment<lb/>
on the part<lb/>
of children</p>
<pb/>
<p>Reasons Contra</p>
<p>1.  No more<lb/>
reason for taking<lb/>
precaution<lb/>
against prodigality<lb/>
in that case<lb/>
than where the<lb/>
proprietor comes<lb/>
into the estate by<lb/>
any other title.</p>
<p>2.  Door open to<lb/>
fraud of creditors<lb/>
who will naturally<lb/>
suppose income to<lb/>
be equal to expenditure<lb/>
– and<lb/>
to be alienable.</p>
<p>Remedy – Register of Settlements.</p>
<pb/>
<p>Inalienability by Settlement<lb/>
II.  In favour of<lb/>
factitious Successors.</p>
<p>This a case<lb/>
of <hi rend="underline">Foundation</hi></p>
<p>Foundations<lb/>
What objects<lb/>
they ought to<lb/>
be allowed to<lb/>
have –</p>
<p>They ought not<lb/>
to be considered<lb/>
as perpetual<lb/>
against the legislature.</p>
<p>It would be giving<lb/>
individuals<lb/>
a power of legislation<lb/>
greater<lb/>
than that of the<lb/>
legislature itself.</p>
<p>Foundations for<lb/>
exalted indigence<lb/>
<add>are among</add> the most unexceptionable<lb/>
instances:<lb/>
but even these<lb/>
are bad in as<lb/>
far as they prevent<lb/>
<hi rend="underline"><del>recheats</del></hi><lb/>
the produce of<lb/>
which would go<lb/>
in relief of the<lb/>
hardest taxes.</p>
<pb/>
<p><head>Succession by Settlement – Brouillon – Dr. Privé</head></p>
<p>Foundations for<lb/>
defence of particular<lb/>
opinions to be void<lb/>
as to defence – good<lb/>
as to enquiry</p>
<p>Foundations for<lb/>
enquiry to be good<lb/>
provisionally – but<lb/>
liable to be resumed<lb/>
by government.</p>
<pb/>
<p>In Wills, conditions<lb/>
making the legacy an<lb/>
instrument of power<lb/>
ought to be void – &amp;<lb/>
the bequest absolute</p>
<p><del>Restraining can</del><lb/>
Reason every man<lb/>
is the best judge of<lb/>
what is best for<lb/>
himself.</p>
<p>Examples<lb/>
1.  Conditions in restraint<lb/>
of marriage –<lb/>
restraining a man<lb/>
from marrying a particular<lb/>
woman.</p>
<p>2.  Bequest on condition<lb/>
of marrying a<lb/>
particular woman.<lb/>
It should be left either<lb/>
to the man or to the<lb/>
woman, leaving them<lb/>
free to choose whether<lb/>
they will intermarry.</p>
<p>Conditions leading<lb/>
to equalization of<lb/>
fortunes – may be<lb/>
allowed if not made<lb/>
the instrument of power<lb/>
as above.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:49, 13 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

Dr. Privé – Brouillon – Succession by Settlement

See Consentement Ch. 3.

Inalienability

by Settlement
I. in person
1. Whether? – in
any case?
2. In what cases
3. For how many
steps?
4. For what length
of time?

Wife's Jointure
after death of
Husband?
2. Wife's separate
maintenance during
life of husband?


---page break---

Reasons pro –
1. Precaution against
prodigality
2. Precaution against
disappointment
on the part
of children


---page break---

Reasons Contra

1. No more
reason for taking
precaution
against prodigality
in that case
than where the
proprietor comes
into the estate by
any other title.

2. Door open to
fraud of creditors
who will naturally
suppose income to
be equal to expenditure
– and
to be alienable.

Remedy – Register of Settlements.


---page break---

Inalienability by Settlement
II. In favour of
factitious Successors.

This a case
of Foundation

Foundations
What objects
they ought to
be allowed to
have –

They ought not
to be considered
as perpetual
against the legislature.

It would be giving
individuals
a power of legislation
greater
than that of the
legislature itself.

Foundations for
exalted indigence
are among the most unexceptionable
instances:
but even these
are bad in as
far as they prevent
recheats
the produce of
which would go
in relief of the
hardest taxes.


---page break---

Succession by Settlement – Brouillon – Dr. Privé

Foundations for
defence of particular
opinions to be void
as to defence – good
as to enquiry

Foundations for
enquiry to be good
provisionally – but
liable to be resumed
by government.


---page break---

In Wills, conditions
making the legacy an
instrument of power
ought to be void – &
the bequest absolute

Restraining can
Reason every man
is the best judge of
what is best for
himself.

Examples
1. Conditions in restraint
of marriage –
restraining a man
from marrying a particular
woman.

2. Bequest on condition
of marrying a
particular woman.
It should be left either
to the man or to the
woman, leaving them
free to choose whether
they will intermarry.

Conditions leading
to equalization of
fortunes – may be
allowed if not made
the instrument of power
as above.


Identifier: | JB/029/010/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 29.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

029

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

010

Info in main headings field

dr. prive brouillon - succession by settlement

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

9453

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in