JB/078/036/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/078/036/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1826. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. <del><gap/></del> +</p>
 
<head>Review of Humphreys</head>
<note>Mortgage</note><lb/>
<p>Pledged and Lender<lb/>
Borrower and Lender<lb/>
Land Pawner</p>
 
<p><del>By an <gap/></del> I <unclear>bet</unclear><lb/>
<del>not immoveable syn<gap/></del></p>
 
<head>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 2. Mortgage</head>
 
<note><!-- Pencil note -->1<lb/>
Particulars in which<lb/>
Mortgage differs from Sale<lb/>
1. In Sale transfer can<lb/>
med<gap/> in mortgage,<lb/>
eventual: event, non<lb/>
payment of money costs</note><lb/>
 
<p><del>To what parties</del> This <hi rend="underline">second</hi> mode of disposition - in<lb/>
what particulars is it different from the <del>firm</del> firstmentioned non-<lb/>
sale? <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi>. In the following. In the case of sale, the transfer<lb/>
<del>was</del> <add>is</add> absolute and immediate: in the case of mortgage future<lb/>
contingent: event on which contingent, <del>non</del> repayment of<lb/>
money lent:- lent by mortgagee (eventual purchaser) <lb/>
to mortgageor (the eventual seller.| Miserably unexpressive<lb/>
this pair  of denominations but being so thoroughly rooted in<lb/>
law language, <add>they mean</add> to the torment of lay <unclear>quits</unclear> and <unclear>lyros</unclear>, they can<lb/>
not but be continued. Land <del>parties</del> <add>pledger</add> and Land <del>pawners</del><add>pledgers</add><lb/>
Lender would be terrific; but would not be the less expressive. Land<lb/>
<add>pledger's</add> pawners Lands which every body would understand has not <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<del>now</del> so many words in it as <hi rend="underline">casting give trust</hi> which nobody<lb/>
understands and nobody<add>no</add> but a learned gentleman <add>pretender is</add> <unclear>faciens</unclear> <add><del>pretends</del></add> himself<lb/>
to understand.</p>
<note>2.<lb/>
In<gap/>pression, <hi rend="underline">mortgage</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Land pledge</hi> better<lb/>
Reference to <gap/> que<lb/>
<gap/></note><lb/>
 
<p>When, to secure <del>pair repr</del> payment of interest, and<lb/>
thereafter repayment of principal, land as they put in <gap/><lb/>
<del>the common objec</del> there are three ways in any one of which<lb/>
the common object is capable of being effected: three different<lb/>
conditions in respect of possession: three different sorts of persons<lb/> 
in <del>whose</del> the possession of any one  of whom the subject matter might<lb/>
be the <del>Land pawner to say if less shocking the</del> Land<lb/>
pledger. <del>the Landpawners</del> <add>Land</add>-pledgers Lender, and <add>sum</add> or third<lb/>
person agreed upon by both in the <add>to official</add> character of trustees. Where<lb/>
confidence suffices, the ford mentioned of these diversifications is manifestly<lb/>
<add>both <gap/> considered</add> the most eligible of the three: the <del>subject matter</del> party in<lb/>
whose possession the subject matter is continued is the one whose interest<lb/>
in the preservation of it is by far the greatest: <add>to</add> the proprietor<lb/>
the mortification of having the apparent d<gap/> is spared</p>
<note>3<lb/>
Footing on which<lb/>
money might be borrowed<lb/>
on loan - a<lb/>
Trustee to hold for<lb/>
borrower and lender</note><lb/>
 
<p>By an I <gap/> not inexcusable <add>Note is <gap/></add> <del>synected</del> synecdoche, I say Land-pawner<lb/>
the only proper in being the only adequately comprehensive denomination<lb/>
Immoveable <gap/> parties would move more indignation than I can find were to endure.</p>
<note>Frankpledg is<lb/>
View of Frankpledge is<lb/>
already in law language<lb/>
</note><lb/>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:27, 13 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

1826. Octr. +

Review of Humphreys Mortgage

Pledged and Lender
Borrower and Lender
Land Pawner

By an I bet
not immoveable syn

No 2. Mortgage

1
Particulars in which
Mortgage differs from Sale
1. In Sale transfer can
med in mortgage,
eventual: event, non
payment of money costs

To what parties This second mode of disposition - in
what particulars is it different from the firm firstmentioned non-
sale? Answer. In the following. In the case of sale, the transfer
was is absolute and immediate: in the case of mortgage future
contingent: event on which contingent, non repayment of
money lent:- lent by mortgagee (eventual purchaser)
to mortgageor (the eventual seller.| Miserably unexpressive
this pair of denominations but being so thoroughly rooted in
law language, they mean to the torment of lay quits and lyros, they can
not but be continued. Land parties pledger and Land pawnerspledgers
Lender would be terrific; but would not be the less expressive. Land
pledger's pawners Lands which every body would understand has not
now so many words in it as casting give trust which nobody
understands and nobodyno but a learned gentleman pretender is faciens pretends himself
to understand.

2.
Inpression, mortgage
Land pledge better
Reference to que

When, to secure pair repr payment of interest, and
thereafter repayment of principal, land as they put in
the common objec there are three ways in any one of which
the common object is capable of being effected: three different
conditions in respect of possession: three different sorts of persons
in whose the possession of any one of whom the subject matter might
be the Land pawner to say if less shocking the Land
pledger. the Landpawners Land-pledgers Lender, and sum or third
person agreed upon by both in the to official character of trustees. Where
confidence suffices, the ford mentioned of these diversifications is manifestly
both considered the most eligible of the three: the subject matter party in
whose possession the subject matter is continued is the one whose interest
in the preservation of it is by far the greatest: to the proprietor
the mortification of having the apparent d is spared

3
Footing on which
money might be borrowed
on loan - a
Trustee to hold for
borrower and lender

By an I not inexcusable Note is synected synecdoche, I say Land-pawner
the only proper in being the only adequately comprehensive denomination
Immoveable parties would move more indignation than I can find were to endure.

Frankpledg is
View of Frankpledge is
already in law language




Identifier: | JB/078/036/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-10-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

036

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

No 2 Mortgage

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C13 / C1 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1826

Notes public

ID Number

25127

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in