JB/081/124/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/124/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/124/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/124/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>1829 April 30<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>C2<lb/><note>Suits in pendency</note><lb/>(9 <note>&sect; Benefits<lb/>Non Disappointment transfer</note></p> <p><del>No the <gap/> produced <gap/> <gap/> in any shape produced<lb/>So much for <gap/>-<gap/>-<gap/> <gap/><lb/>than for <gap/> and <gap/> <gap/> language &#x2014; <gap/> language</del></p> <p><note>1<lb/>Wills-construction-<lb/>ruling principle the<lb/>non disappointment principle</note></p> <p>Now then in the construction of an obligatory <del>promise initial</del> <add>promise unilateral</add> is<lb/>reciprocal, or a post obituary conveyance &#x2014; <del><gap/></del> say a <hi rend="underline">last will</hi> what<lb/>on this occasion shall be the guide?  The body of the Equity branch<lb/>of the imaginary law called unwritten?  I <del><gap/></del> <add>answer</add> no; but the <del>Non-disappointment<lb/><add><gap/></add> or say</del> Disappointment <gap/> or <add>say</add> <hi rend="underline">Non-disappointment<lb/>principle.</hi></p> <p>Of this all-comprehensive principle <del><gap/></del> <add>a pretty full exposition has</add> <del.<gap/> <gap/></del><lb/><del>person</del> <add>been given and</add> application <del><gap/></del> <add>made</add> elsewhere <hi rend="superscript">+</hi></p> <p><note>2<lb/>This principle all ruling<lb/>within the domain of<lb/>the law of property</note></p> <p>Invented has <add>been</add> the appellation for the purpose of giving denomination<lb/>to a principle which (though to use an appellation employed<lb/>by the Romans <foreign><gap/> <gap/> <hi rend="underline">innomidate</hi></foreign>)  <add>that is to say <hi rend="underline">undenominated</hi></add> <foreign>it <gap/></foreign all ruling within<lb/>the <del><gap/></del> <add><del><gap/></del> domain of the law</add> of <hi rend="underline">property</hi>.</p> <p>3<lb/>Equity arrangements in<lb/>so far as conformable<lb/>to greatest happiness<lb/>principle are conformable<lb>to this principle also</note></p> <p>in so far as <del>it has been</del> <add>they have been</add> conformable to the <add><gap/> of the</add> greatest happiness<lb/>principle, conformable have been the <del><gap/></del> dictates of this principle the<lb/>arrangements made by Equity <gap/> law.</p> <p>But to a <gap/> wide <del><gap/></del> extent &#x2014; not conformable<lb/>but unconformable to a <gap/> of the <del>greatest happiness</del> <add>the same <gap/></add> principle<lb/><gap/> the arrangement made by this same Equity <gap/> law,<lb/>to the dictates of this same <del><gap/></del> <add><sic>unnominate</sic></add> principle: and thereby<lb/>unconformable to the dictates of the greatest happiness principle.</p> <p><note>4.<lb/>Suppose dispatch<lb/>commissioners decision<lb/>conformable to the greatest<lb/>happiness principle &#x2014; <lb/>no disappointment, no<lb/>evil.</note></p> <p>Now then suppose the course taken by the Dispatch Commissioners<lb/>non conformable to the <gap/> of the perfect happiness principle then<lb/>would have been <del><gap/></del> the <del><gap/></del> arrangements made by the <gap/><lb/>Equity Judge, where <del><gap/></del> this <gap/>, with danger?  Answer:<lb/>no where.  No disappointment any where, no evil any where.</p> <p>So much for <gap/> clear ideas and language adapted<lb/>to the production of them.</p> <p>Subject to the same, none for language which because <add>in relation to</add><lb/>it is familiar the supposition is that it answers that purpose<lb/>whatever it be.</p> <!-- next paragraph crossed through in pencil --> <p>Enter every principle of justice, first principle of justice<lb/>vested rights &#9758; See the next page.</p> <!-- line in ink across the page --> <p>+ See Wisheart Review for 1826 <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> XII p.58, 59.<lb/><foreign>Quere</foreign> whether to repeat these two pages here</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 11:53, 18 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 April 30
Petitions

C2
Suits in pendency
(9 § Benefits
Non Disappointment transfer

No the produced in any shape produced
So much for --
than for and language — language

1
Wills-construction-
ruling principle the
non disappointment principle

Now then in the construction of an obligatory promise initial promise unilateral is
reciprocal, or a post obituary conveyance — say a last will what
on this occasion shall be the guide? The body of the Equity branch
of the imaginary law called unwritten? I answer no; but the Non-disappointment
or say
Disappointment or say Non-disappointment
principle.

Of this all-comprehensive principle a pretty full exposition has <del.
person been given and application made elsewhere +

2
This principle all ruling
within the domain of
the law of property

Invented has been the appellation for the purpose of giving denomination
to a principle which (though to use an appellation employed
by the Romans innomidate) that is to say undenominated it </foreign all ruling within
the domain of the law of property.

3
Equity arrangements in
so far as conformable
to greatest happiness
principle are conformable<lb>to this principle also</note>

in so far as it has been they have been conformable to the of the greatest happiness
principle, conformable have been the dictates of this principle the
arrangements made by Equity law.

But to a wide extent — not conformable
but unconformable to a of the greatest happiness the same principle
the arrangement made by this same Equity law,
to the dictates of this same unnominate principle: and thereby
unconformable to the dictates of the greatest happiness principle.

4.
Suppose dispatch
commissioners decision
conformable to the greatest
happiness principle —
no disappointment, no
evil.

Now then suppose the course taken by the Dispatch Commissioners
non conformable to the of the perfect happiness principle then
would have been the arrangements made by the
Equity Judge, where this , with danger? Answer:
no where. No disappointment any where, no evil any where.

So much for clear ideas and language adapted
to the production of them.

Subject to the same, none for language which because in relation to
it is familiar the supposition is that it answers that purpose
whatever it be.

Enter every principle of justice, first principle of justice
vested rights ☞ See the next page.

+ See Wisheart Review for 1826 No XII p.58, 59.
<foreign>Quere whether to repeat these two pages here




Identifier: | JB/081/124/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-04-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

124

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e9 / f18

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25911

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in