★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/078/049/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head> | <head>1826: Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 7<lb/>Review of Humphreys.</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p>+ + 79 <note><sic>ult<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Machinery</note><lb/>(3 <note>H.s <sic>compleatness</sic><lb/>J.B. simple</note></p> <p><del>Population</del> Returns: batch the second. Year appointed<lb/>for the commencement of the inquiries: 1811: day and month<lb/><del>month</del> not apparent: <del>day when</del><add>Month in which</add> Report was delivered in<lb/>June 1822: presumable time occupied in collecting and digesting,<lb/>as before, 13 Months. Lastly, Scotch</p> <p><del>Lastly Scotch</del> Education Return. Date of the <del>Order</del><lb/>House of Commons <del>Order</del> <add>Resolution</add> in which they originated, 30 March 1825.<lb/>date of <del>Lord Advocates</del> Under Secretary of State's: Letter to<lb/>the Lord Advocate in consequence, the very <del>da</del> next day<lb/>31 March 1825: <del>Letter from</del> date of Letter from Lord Advocate,<lb/>sending <add>the first part in</add> the whole of the information, 14 February 1826:<lb/><del><gap/> time employed in coll</del> <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> of pages in the printed<lb/>copy 985: time <add>thus</add> employed in collecting not more than<lb/>four <add>and a half</add> months: <del>in</del> <add>within</add> which time <add>was performed</add> a vibrating <del><gap/></del> <add>system</add> of correspondence<lb/>composed of divers vibrations — letters written backwards and<lb/>forwards. <del>was performed</del></p> <p>In the case in question would any greater length of time<lb/>be necessary? any grounds for any apprehension to that effect<lb/> can they be assigned.? None whatever <del>As to</del> Places constituting<lb/>the <unclear>local</unclear> <del>subject matter</del> <add>objects</add> of enquiry and sources of information —<lb/>in those cases, the Parishes; in these, the Manors. Reluctance,<lb/>as to the communicating the information, is any<lb/>great degree probable in this case than in those? <del>Answer</del><lb/>No: nor yet so much. In these cases <add>reclamation being out of the question</add> nothing was to be got<lb/>by furnishing the information, nothing to be lost by not furnishing<lb/>On the present <del><gap/></del> occasion <del><gap/> <gap/> be lost by</del> <add>more or less <del>nor</del> may</add> <unclear>at present</unclear><lb/>be lost by omitting to <del><gap/> <add><gap/></add> the <gap/></del> furnish the information: more<lb/>or less perhaps to be got by furnishing it: for, <del>no <gap/> of <add>of work</add> <gap/></del><lb/><del>in the nature of</del> <add>to</add> each individual <del>of</del> <add>from</add> whom the information would<lb/>be required, the consequence <add>of omission</add> would be — that his interest would<lb/>be disposed of, <del>without</del> and in case of loss on his part, no<lb/>indemnity would <del>be received by him</del> he receive.</p> | ||
Review of Humphreys.</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p>+ + 79 <note><sic>ult<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Machinery<lb/>H.s <sic>compleatness</sic><lb/>J.B. simple</note></p> <p><del>Population</del> Returns: batch the second. Year appointed<lb/>for the commencement of the inquiries: 1811: day and month<lb/><del>month</del> not apparent: <del>day when</del><add>Month in which</add> Report was delivered in<lb/>June 1822: presumable time occupied in collecting and digesting,<lb/>as before, 13 Months. Lastly, Scotch</p> <p><del>Lastly Scotch</del> Education Return. Date of the <del>Order</del><lb/>House of Commons <del>Order</del> <add>Resolution</add> in which they originated, 30 March 1825.<lb/>date of <del>Lord Advocates</del> Under Secretary of State's: Letter to<lb/>the Lord Advocate in consequence, the very <del> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1826: Decr. 7
Review of Humphreys.
+ + 79 ulto
Ch. Machinery
(3 H.s compleatness
J.B. simple
Population Returns: batch the second. Year appointed
for the commencement of the inquiries: 1811: day and month
month not apparent: day whenMonth in which Report was delivered in
June 1822: presumable time occupied in collecting and digesting,
as before, 13 Months. Lastly, Scotch
Lastly Scotch Education Return. Date of the Order
House of Commons Order Resolution in which they originated, 30 March 1825.
date of Lord Advocates Under Secretary of State's: Letter to
the Lord Advocate in consequence, the very da next day
31 March 1825: Letter from date of Letter from Lord Advocate,
sending the first part in the whole of the information, 14 February 1826:
time employed in coll No of pages in the printed
copy 985: time thus employed in collecting not more than
four and a half months: in within which time was performed a vibrating system of correspondence
composed of divers vibrations — letters written backwards and
forwards. was performed
In the case in question would any greater length of time
be necessary? any grounds for any apprehension to that effect
can they be assigned.? None whatever As to Places constituting
the local subject matter objects of enquiry and sources of information —
in those cases, the Parishes; in these, the Manors. Reluctance,
as to the communicating the information, is any
great degree probable in this case than in those? Answer
No: nor yet so much. In these cases reclamation being out of the question nothing was to be got
by furnishing the information, nothing to be lost by not furnishing
On the present occasion be lost by more or less nor may at present
be lost by omitting to the furnish the information: more
or less perhaps to be got by furnishing it: for, no of of work
in the nature of to each individual of from whom the information would
be required, the consequence of omission would be — that his interest would
be disposed of, without and in case of loss on his part, no
indemnity would be received by him he receive.
|
Identifier: | JB/078/049/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-12-06 |
|||
|
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
049 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
D74 / E3 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1826 |
|||
|
25140 |
|||
