★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><head>1821. Aug. 4.<lb/> | |||
Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria. Titles of Letters</head></p> | |||
<p><head>Part 1: Injury to Peninsular Spain from her claim to dominion over Ultramarian Spain</head></p> | |||
<p>Introduction.<lb/> | |||
Titles of the Sections.</p> | |||
<p>§ 1.<lb/> | |||
Indulgence entricated.</p> | |||
<p>§ 2.<lb/> | |||
Order pursued.</p> | |||
<p>§ 3.<lb/> | |||
Witness to Spanish ruler's opinions <add>against the claim</add>, N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. 1787.<lb/> | |||
Joseph Townsend.</p> | |||
<p>§ 4.<lb/> | |||
Spanish Ruler's opinions <add>against the claim</add> N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. 1787.</p> | |||
<p>§ 5.<lb/> | |||
Townsend's opinion. N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. 1787.</p> | |||
<p>§ 6.<lb/> | |||
Tables, showing the grounds] of these opinions with preliminary explanations.</p> | |||
<p>§ 7.<lb/> | |||
Jeremy Bentham's opinion, <add>against the claim,</add> N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. 1792, as applied to France, and to distant dependencies in general.</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 1.<lb/> | |||
Plan of the work.</p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 2.<lb/> | |||
Interests concerned – preliminary distinctions.</p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 3.<lb/> | |||
To the subject many in<lb/> | |||
Spain, the dominion w<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/> | |||
be hurtful, were Ultramarians<lb/> | |||
ever so desirous<lb/> | |||
of submitting to it: viz.<lb/> | |||
1 in a pecuniary view.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Ultramaria submissive,</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">profit none;</hi> loss, great</p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 4.<lb/> | |||
By Ultramarian submission,<lb/> | |||
how extensive<lb/> | |||
soever, no continued receipt<lb/> | |||
of money in Spain<lb/> | |||
would be rendered probable.<lb/> | |||
The Code, if submitted<lb/> | |||
so, affords no such<lb/> | |||
probability.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Under Code, profit none.</hi></p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 5.<lb/> | |||
Much more in proportion<lb/> | |||
as they are averse, as under<lb/> | |||
the Constitution they<lb/> | |||
can not fail to be. Causes<lb/> | |||
of such aversion enumerated –<lb/> | |||
explanation and<lb/> | |||
proof postponed.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Ultramarian submission</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">why impossible.</hi></p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 6.<lb/> | |||
To the ruling few indeed<lb/> | |||
the claim would, in a<lb/> | |||
great degree, be profitable.<lb/> | |||
Hence, one cause of the attachment<lb/> | |||
to it.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">From claim, Ruler's profit</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">great.</hi></p> | |||
<p>Part I. Letter 7.<lb/> | |||
II To the subject many in<lb/> | |||
Spain, in a Constitutional<lb/> | |||
view, the claim can not<lb/> | |||
but be productive of great<lb/> | |||
evils. | |||
I. Anti-Constitutional.<lb/> | |||
Evil 1. Vitiating the composition<lb/> | |||
of the Cortes.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">1. In Cortes, foreign interest</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline"><del>predominant</del></hi> <add><del>not</del></add> obstructive.</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 8.<lb/> | |||
2. Anti Constitutional<lb/> | |||
Evil 2. Adding to the<lb/> | |||
mass of corruptive influence.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">2. Corruptive influence<lb/> increased.</hi></p> | |||
<p> Part I Letter 9.<lb/> | |||
3. Anti Constitutional<lb/> | |||
Evil 3. Adding to the time<lb/> | |||
during which Deputies are irremovable. | |||
<hi rend="underline">3. Bad Deputies longer irremovable.</hi></p> | |||
<p> Part I Letter 10.<lb/> | |||
4. Anti Constitutional<lb/> | |||
Evil 4. Adding occupation<lb/> | |||
to the time of the Cortes,<lb/> | |||
though otherwise insufficient<lb/> | |||
for their duties.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">4. Cortes time wasted.</hi></p> | |||
<p> Part I Letter 11.<lb/> | |||
5. Anti Constitutional<lb/> | |||
Evil 5. Planting in Ultramaria,<lb/> | |||
thence for Spain<lb/> | |||
a latent despotism.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">5. Despotism secretly planted.</hi></p> | |||
<p>Addendum 3 March 1822<lb/> | |||
Part I Letter 12<lb/> | |||
Ultramaria lost in respect<lb/> | |||
of Foreign the <gap/><lb/> | |||
Weakening in Spain<lb/> | |||
National Defence.<lb/> | |||
The power of defence against<lb/> | |||
aggression on the<lb/> | |||
pat of European <del>powers</del><lb/> | |||
States - <hi rend="underline">Defensive power weakened</hi>.</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p> Part II Letter <del>12 or</del> 1<lb/> | |||
Causes of Ultramarian<lb/> | |||
aversion explained.<lb/> | |||
Cause 1. New lights and<lb/> | |||
Code preclude submission<lb/> | |||
on the former footing.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">1. Lights exclude blind submission.</hi></p> | |||
<p> Part II Letter <del>13 or</del> 2<lb/> | |||
Cause 2. Whole Ultramarian<lb/> | |||
Revenue placed at<lb/> | |||
the command of the authorities<lb/> | |||
in Spain.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">2. Revenue all to Spain</hi></p> | |||
<p> Part II Letter <del>14 or</del> 3<lb/> | |||
Cause 3. To the dominion, Appeals to Spain are necessary:<lb/> | |||
to Ultramaria, they<lb/> | |||
are grievance unendurable.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Appeals made possible yet unendurable.</hi></p> | |||
<p> Part II<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> Letter <del>15 or 5</del> 6<lb/> | |||
<add>Cause 4.</add> Under the Code, Ultramaria<lb/> | |||
stands precluded<lb/> | |||
from all exercise of even<lb/> | |||
subordinate legislation:<lb/> | |||
thence, from all improvement<lb/> | |||
and <add>as well as from</add> all redress, except<lb/> | |||
from resistance.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Ultramarian legislation none.</hi></p> | |||
<p> Part II Letter <del>16 or 6</del> 7<lb/> | |||
Cause 5. By no such share<lb/> | |||
in the Representation as<lb/> | |||
is given to Ultramaria<lb/> | |||
is any security <add>afforded</add> against<lb/> | |||
misrule afforded<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Share in Representation no security.</hi></p> | |||
<p> Part II Letter <del>17 or 6 7</del> 8<lb/> | |||
Cause 6. Under the Code,<lb/> | |||
no Ultramarian Deputation<lb/> | |||
can be formed,<lb/> | |||
thence, nor the supposed<lb/> | |||
security afforded.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Ultramarian Deputation none.</hi></p> | |||
<p> Part II Letter <del>18 or 7 8</del> 9<lb/> | |||
Cause 7. To the interests<lb/> | |||
of the ruling and influential<lb/> | |||
few <add>in Ultramaria,</add> the claim is particularly<lb/> | |||
adverse.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Ultramarian rulers injured.</hi></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1821. Aug. 4.
Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria. Titles of Letters
Part 1: Injury to Peninsular Spain from her claim to dominion over Ultramarian Spain
Introduction.
Titles of the Sections.
§ 1.
Indulgence entricated.
§ 2.
Order pursued.
§ 3.
Witness to Spanish ruler's opinions against the claim, No. 1787.
Joseph Townsend.
§ 4.
Spanish Ruler's opinions against the claim No. 1787.
§ 5.
Townsend's opinion. No. 1787.
§ 6.
Tables, showing the grounds] of these opinions with preliminary explanations.
§ 7.
Jeremy Bentham's opinion, against the claim, No. 1792, as applied to France, and to distant dependencies in general.
---page break---
Part I Letter 1.
Plan of the work.
Part I Letter 2.
Interests concerned – preliminary distinctions.
Part I Letter 3.
To the subject many in
Spain, the dominion wd
be hurtful, were Ultramarians
ever so desirous
of submitting to it: viz.
1 in a pecuniary view.
Ultramaria submissive,
profit none; loss, great
Part I Letter 4.
By Ultramarian submission,
how extensive
soever, no continued receipt
of money in Spain
would be rendered probable.
The Code, if submitted
so, affords no such
probability.
Under Code, profit none.
Part I Letter 5.
Much more in proportion
as they are averse, as under
the Constitution they
can not fail to be. Causes
of such aversion enumerated –
explanation and
proof postponed.
Ultramarian submission
why impossible.
Part I Letter 6.
To the ruling few indeed
the claim would, in a
great degree, be profitable.
Hence, one cause of the attachment
to it.
From claim, Ruler's profit
great.
Part I. Letter 7.
II To the subject many in
Spain, in a Constitutional
view, the claim can not
but be productive of great
evils.
I. Anti-Constitutional.
Evil 1. Vitiating the composition
of the Cortes.
1. In Cortes, foreign interest
predominant not obstructive.
---page break---
Part I Letter 8.
2. Anti Constitutional
Evil 2. Adding to the
mass of corruptive influence.
2. Corruptive influence
increased.
Part I Letter 9.
3. Anti Constitutional
Evil 3. Adding to the time
during which Deputies are irremovable.
3. Bad Deputies longer irremovable.
Part I Letter 10.
4. Anti Constitutional
Evil 4. Adding occupation
to the time of the Cortes,
though otherwise insufficient
for their duties.
4. Cortes time wasted.
Part I Letter 11.
5. Anti Constitutional
Evil 5. Planting in Ultramaria,
thence for Spain
a latent despotism.
5. Despotism secretly planted.
Addendum 3 March 1822
Part I Letter 12
Ultramaria lost in respect
of Foreign the
Weakening in Spain
National Defence.
The power of defence against
aggression on the
pat of European powers
States - Defensive power weakened.
---page break---
Part II Letter 12 or 1
Causes of Ultramarian
aversion explained.
Cause 1. New lights and
Code preclude submission
on the former footing.
1. Lights exclude blind submission.
Part II Letter 13 or 2
Cause 2. Whole Ultramarian
Revenue placed at
the command of the authorities
in Spain.
2. Revenue all to Spain
Part II Letter 14 or 3
Cause 3. To the dominion, Appeals to Spain are necessary:
to Ultramaria, they
are grievance unendurable.
Appeals made possible yet unendurable.
Part II⊞ Letter 15 or 5 6
Cause 4. Under the Code, Ultramaria
stands precluded
from all exercise of even
subordinate legislation:
thence, from all improvement
and as well as from all redress, except
from resistance.
Ultramarian legislation none.
Part II Letter 16 or 6 7
Cause 5. By no such share
in the Representation as
is given to Ultramaria
is any security afforded against
misrule afforded
Share in Representation no security.
Part II Letter 17 or 6 7 8
Cause 6. Under the Code,
no Ultramarian Deputation
can be formed,
thence, nor the supposed
security afforded.
Ultramarian Deputation none.
Part II Letter 18 or 7 8 9
Cause 7. To the interests
of the ruling and influential
few in Ultramaria, the claim is particularly
adverse.
Ultramarian rulers injured.
Identifier: | JB/008/063/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 8. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1821-08-04 |
|||
008 |
rid yourselves of ultramaria |
||
063a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63. |
rid yourselves of ultramaria titles of letters |
||
002 |
part i injury to peninsular spain from her claim to dominion over ultramarian spain |
||
plan |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
john flowerdew colls |
|||
jonathan blenman |
|||
1819 |
|||
3167 |
|||