JB/012/010/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/012/010/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/012/010/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
to apprehend. As to any <add>particular</add> use which it may at any time<lb/>
to apprehend. As to any <add>particular</add> use which it may at any time<lb/>
fall in my way to make of them, <del>yet another</del> though <del>there</del> <add>there can</add><lb/>
fall in my way to make of them, <del>yet another</del> though <del>there</del> <add>there can</add><lb/>
<del>is nothing</del> <add>not be any thing</add> <unclear>or</unclear> is that I need be ashamed of, yet that <del>you</del><lb/>
<del>is nothing</del> <add>not be any thing</add> in it that I need be ashamed of, yet that <del>you</del><lb/>
any information you may be pleased to <sic>furnis</sic> me with<lb/>
any information you may be pleased to <unclear>favour</unclear> me with<lb/>
may be the more <del>manifestly</del> <add>incontrovertibly</add> exempt form every imaginable<lb/>
may be the more <del>manifestly</del> <add>incontrovertibly</add> exempt from every imaginable<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> seductive bias, it would be a further favour done to me<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> seductive bias, it would be a further favour done to me<lb/>
if you would <del><gap/> allow me <gap/> <gap/> it</del> <add>forbear putting any questions to me on that head</add></p>
if you would <del><gap/> allow me <gap/> <gap/> it</del> <add>forbear putting any questions to me on that head</add></p>
Line 44: Line 44:
Unitarians, have any publication <del>appeared</del> <add>or publications made their appearance</add>: and if any whether<lb/>
Unitarians, have any publication <del>appeared</del> <add>or publications made their appearance</add>: and if any whether<lb/>
on one <add>and which</add> or both sides? Should you suppose, that <del>on any</del> <add>in consequence, any</add><lb/>
on one <add>and which</add> or both sides? Should you suppose, that <del>on any</del> <add>in consequence, any</add><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <del><add><gap/> appear probable to you that</add></del> proselytes have been made on either side <add>or both</add>, and <del>if so</del> in what<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <del><add><gap/> appear probable to you that</add></del> proselytes have been made on either <add>or both</add> sides, and <del>if so</del> in what<lb/>
proportions?</p>
proportions?</p>


Line 50: Line 50:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:30, 25 August 2023

Click Here To Edit

May 1817
June

Dear Sir

The matters of fact which form the subject of the
following queries being in their nature matters of the utmost
notoriety in your country I am inclined to hope you will not see any conclusive
sufficient reason for satisfying affording decling to afford satisfaction to the desire I need I
feel have of obtaining information in relation to them: flattering
myself that what you have seen and heard of you would me might be
regarded as affording sufficient security against my making any ill endeavouring to make
use of them as if they were liable to be any apprehension of any endeavour on my part to make any improper
use of the requested information if in its nature it were liable to be
so made use of, which is more than I can see any reason
to apprehend. As to any particular use which it may at any time
fall in my way to make of them, yet another though there there can
is nothing not be any thing in it that I need be ashamed of, yet that you
any information you may be pleased to favour me with
may be the more manifestly incontrovertibly exempt from every imaginable
seductive bias, it would be a further favour done to me
if you would allow me it forbear putting any questions to me on that head

Taking the fixation of the existing Constitution of the United
States for the epoch à quo,

1 In regard to prosecutions for libel of any and what
kinds
have they, in the several States of the Union respectively, been
frequent or otherwise? and in any case can any guess, how
rough so ever, be made in relation to the number?
and in the first place as to alledged libels on the subject
of government? arraigning vituperating the form of the existing Constitution
calling for changes to be made in it, or arraigning the conduct
of any one or more of the public functionaries?

2. The like questions in relation to religion? and in
particular to blasphemy?

3. In relation to the question between Trinitarians and
Unitarians, have any publication appeared or publications made their appearance: and if any whether
on one and which or both sides? Should you suppose, that on any in consequence, any
appear probable to you that proselytes have been made on either or both sides, and if so in what
proportions?




Identifier: | JB/012/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 12.

Date_1

1817-06-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

012

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

010

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

draft of letter 2385, vol. 9

ID Number

4071

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in