JB/106/104/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/104/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/104/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/104/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/104/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->10 March 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>In the Spiritual Courts and in the Admiralty Courts<lb/>
 
any more than in the Equity Courts, is any such separation<lb/>
 
made between the question of law and the question of fact:  nor<lb/>
 
any use made of the Jury judicature <add>trial</add>.</p>
<p>But by means of the sort of correspondence which<lb/>
it is <add>they are</add> in the habit of keeping up with the Common Law Courts<lb/>
Equity <add>Courts</add> does occasionally give the suitor the benefit of the<lb/>
separation, with the <add>by the</add> congenial benefit of Jury judicature.</p>
<p>Neither do the Spiritual Courts, nor the Admiralty<lb/>
Courts keep up any such correspondence.</p>
<p>If <del>such separate</del> the sort of decomposition here<lb/>
in question, and with it the use of the Jury box, in<lb/>
the character of an <add>appropriate</add> instrument for operating it be in Common<lb/>
Law causes <add>always</add> and in Equity causes not <add>ever and more</add> unfrequently<lb/>
conducive to the ends of justice, why not in Spiritual<lb/>
causes and in Admiralty causes?</p>
<p><del><gap/></del> A question surely not inapposite.  But a<lb/>
supposition tacitly involved in it is that <add>in each of those Courts</add> the system of<lb/>
procedure was in its origin regulated by a correct and<lb/>
comprehensive view <add>conception of</add> as well as an honest regard to<lb/>
the ends of justice, instead of being a blindman's buff<lb/>
scramble for power and profit, carried on <add>blindfold</add> in the dark<lb/>
ages.  Those ages when wisdom conveyed to them by instruction,<lb/>
without the trouble of experience, is so often reclaimed as the<lb/>
fit model and standard of instruction for each recessive and<lb/>
more and more experienced age.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> Wisdom of ages!  Wisdom of ages! – cries every lawyer, and mercenary placeman, who has an abuse to defend, and effrontery to defend it.</note></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:54, 27 August 2023

Click Here To Edit

10 March 1807

In the Spiritual Courts and in the Admiralty Courts
any more than in the Equity Courts, is any such separation
made between the question of law and the question of fact: nor
any use made of the Jury judicature trial.

But by means of the sort of correspondence which
it is they are in the habit of keeping up with the Common Law Courts
Equity Courts does occasionally give the suitor the benefit of the
separation, with the by the congenial benefit of Jury judicature.

Neither do the Spiritual Courts, nor the Admiralty
Courts keep up any such correspondence.

If such separate the sort of decomposition here
in question, and with it the use of the Jury box, in
the character of an appropriate instrument for operating it be in Common
Law causes always and in Equity causes not ever and more unfrequently
conducive to the ends of justice, why not in Spiritual
causes and in Admiralty causes?

A question surely not inapposite. But a
supposition tacitly involved in it is that in each of those Courts the system of
procedure was in its origin regulated by a correct and
comprehensive view conception of as well as an honest regard to
the ends of justice, instead of being a blindman's buff
scramble for power and profit, carried on blindfold in the dark
ages. Those ages when wisdom conveyed to them by instruction,
without the trouble of experience, is so often reclaimed as the
fit model and standard of instruction for each recessive and
more and more experienced age. Wisdom of ages! Wisdom of ages! – cries every lawyer, and mercenary placeman, who has an abuse to defend, and effrontery to defend it.


Identifier: | JB/106/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

38-41

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

104

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c19 / e19

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34692

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in