JB/106/117/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/117/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/117/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/117/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->9 March 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><del>A</del> To appear is to appear – the sense of it imprisoned,<lb/>
 
what better <add>more instructive</add> explanation could such a word receive?  Whether<lb/>
 
at such a time or place John <unclear>Stiles</unclear> <hi rend="underline">appeared</hi> or no, what<lb/>
 
if there were such a thing as a question of fact, could such<lb/>
a question be, but a question of <add>mere</add> fact?  Yet this is among<lb/>
the questions which English jurisprudence has <unclear>thus</unclear> improved<lb/>
to convert into a question of law! <add>number among questions of law!</add></p>
<p>Heirs – heirs of the body – Heirs by itself, a<lb/>
word which lawyer must from the first have found in the<lb/>
most common use, but which <add>to which</add> for the sake of certainty <add>certainty's sake</add><lb/>
in any book of real law it might not have been improper<lb/>
to have subjoined an explanation – supposing it always<lb/>
composed for other words in still <add>equally</add> more common use less susceptible of misconception, and at any rate not done <add>selected</add> for<lb/>
the purpose of generating <add><gap/></add> it.</p>
<p>Making <del>my</del> <add>his</add> will in favour of a friend who has a family<lb/>
<del>I give</del> <add>a man gives</add> it to him and his heirs, <del><gap/></del>  meaning that his heirs<lb/>
shall have it, which they can not if he sells it.  What does<lb/>
the English <gap/>.  He takes in hand and poisons the word<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">heirs</hi> he takes <del>from</del> <add>out of</add> it the sense he found belonging to it, he<lb/>
<del><gap/> be</del> crams into it a sense he found not belonging to it.<lb/>
The <del><gap/></del> meaning of the testator was that the first object after<lb/>
<unclear>twenty</unclear> should not deprive the others of it;  the arm of <add>making the</add> law <add>is</add> invests<lb/>
him with that power.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:03, 27 August 2023

Click Here To Edit

9 March 1807

A To appear is to appear – the sense of it imprisoned,
what better more instructive explanation could such a word receive? Whether
at such a time or place John Stiles appeared or no, what
if there were such a thing as a question of fact, could such
a question be, but a question of mere fact? Yet this is among
the questions which English jurisprudence has thus improved
to convert into a question of law! number among questions of law!

Heirs – heirs of the body – Heirs by itself, a
word which lawyer must from the first have found in the
most common use, but which to which for the sake of certainty certainty's sake
in any book of real law it might not have been improper
to have subjoined an explanation – supposing it always
composed for other words in still equally more common use less susceptible of misconception, and at any rate not done selected for
the purpose of generating it.

Making my his will in favour of a friend who has a family
I give a man gives it to him and his heirs, meaning that his heirs
shall have it, which they can not if he sells it. What does
the English . He takes in hand and poisons the word
heirs he takes from out of it the sense he found belonging to it, he
be crams into it a sense he found not belonging to it.
The meaning of the testator was that the first object after
twenty should not deprive the others of it; the arm of making the law is invests
him with that power.


Identifier: | JB/106/117/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

17-19

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

117

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c12 / e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34705

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in