JB/106/119/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/119/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/119/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/119/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->9 Mar. 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Examples might be added to the amount of volumes upon<lb/>
 
volumes:  but from these few, as effectually <add>satisfactorily sufficiently</add> as from any number<lb/>
 
of such volumes, the following conclusions, <add>may, it should seem</add> it is supposed be<lb/>
 
deduced.</p>
<p>1.  That for various purposes it is of importance that the distinction<lb/>
between matter of law and matter of fact should be<lb/>
clearly apprehended, and the departure carefully made and<lb/>
kept up.  &#9758; Here enumerate the purposes.</p>
<p>2.  That in <del><gap/></del> real i.e. Statute law the distinction is<lb/>
readily made <add>apprehended</add>, the separation easily made and kept up.</p>
<p>3.  That in <add>under</add> a <add>compleat and</add> well composed body of <add>statutory</add> law civil and penal<lb/>
if compleat as it might be and ought to be no question of law<lb/>
could arise other than what was grounded in some or<lb/>
more of the words and phrases contained in it.</p>
<p>4.  That in the penning of such a body  of law one of the objects<lb/>
should be <del>to use such</del> so to order the words and phrases of it<lb/>
that under it the number of questions of law <unclear>manually</unclear><lb/>
raised out of it may be as small as possible.</p>
<p>5.  That, in this view for the purpose of abbreviation, terms of<lb/>
very <add>the most</add> general and extensive <add>comprehensive</add> import, <add>such as force, compulsion, fraud &amp;c</add> may on various occasions<lb/>
be very conveniently and almost <add>most</add> necessarily, be employed.</p>
<p><del>6.  But that to fix the impost and settle the application of</del>  6.  But that, lest double and difference of opinion, and their questions<lb/>
of law should spring out of them, and in order to fix the impost and<lb/>
settle the application of them, an explanation of each such word<lb/>
given once for all should be inserted in <add>consigned to</add> some part or other of the<lb/>
code.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:03, 27 August 2023

Click Here To Edit

9 Mar. 1807

Examples might be added to the amount of volumes upon
volumes: but from these few, as effectually satisfactorily sufficiently as from any number
of such volumes, the following conclusions, may, it should seem it is supposed be
deduced.

1. That for various purposes it is of importance that the distinction
between matter of law and matter of fact should be
clearly apprehended, and the departure carefully made and
kept up. ☞ Here enumerate the purposes.

2. That in real i.e. Statute law the distinction is
readily made apprehended, the separation easily made and kept up.

3. That in under a compleat and well composed body of statutory law civil and penal
if compleat as it might be and ought to be no question of law
could arise other than what was grounded in some or
more of the words and phrases contained in it.

4. That in the penning of such a body of law one of the objects
should be to use such so to order the words and phrases of it
that under it the number of questions of law manually
raised out of it may be as small as possible.

5. That, in this view for the purpose of abbreviation, terms of
very the most general and extensive comprehensive import, such as force, compulsion, fraud &c may on various occasions
be very conveniently and almost most necessarily, be employed.

6. But that to fix the impost and settle the application of 6. But that, lest double and difference of opinion, and their questions
of law should spring out of them, and in order to fix the impost and
settle the application of them, an explanation of each such word
given once for all should be inserted in consigned to some part or other of the
code.


Identifier: | JB/106/119/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

22

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

119

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c13 / c14 / e10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34707

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in