JB/106/151/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/151/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/151/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/151/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->8 March 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><add>Naturally</add> Every where therefore it is the supreme legislator that is<lb/>
 
supreme Judge:  The object of judicature is to maintain<lb/>
 
on the part <add>conduct</add> of all the people considered in the character of subjects<lb/>
 
a conformity, a constant conformity to the <add>expression given to</add> supreme will<lb/>
as being the universal standard of rectitude.</p>
<p>What then is the object, the end in view, in allowing<lb/>
to the suitor the faculty of recurrence to this universal <add>standard</add> from<lb/>
law of justice? what then is the <add>proper</add> object – the <add>proper</add> end in view?<lb/>
to maintain the conduct of the Judge, and thence of the people<lb/>
in a state of conformity, to that supreme will – of conformity as<lb/>
universal, and in every respect as perfect as possible: – to<lb/>
maintain this conformity, and of course with as little collateral<lb/>
inconvenience, in the shape of delay, vexation and expence,<lb/>
as possible.</p>
<p><del>Thence crime</del> If these considerations be just, they lead at<lb/>
once to one fundamental rule or aphorism concerning<lb/>
degrees of jurisdiction.</p>
<p>So far as matter of law is concerned,<lb/>
1.  The number of degrees of jurisdiction ought <add>to be</add> in regard to<lb/>
every sort of suit, <del>to be</del> as small as possible – as small<lb/>
as may be, prudential as well as physical practicability considered.</p>
<p>So far as matter of law is concerned<lb/>
2.  No degree of jurisdiction ought ever to be added, but for<lb/>
some special reason <add>cause</add>, proving that for want of it the ends of<lb/>
justice taken in the aggregate, fail of being fulfilled <add>provided</add>, or effectually<lb/>
as they may be by means of it.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:45, 27 August 2023

Click Here To Edit

8 March 1807

Naturally Every where therefore it is the supreme legislator that is
supreme Judge: The object of judicature is to maintain
on the part conduct of all the people considered in the character of subjects
a conformity, a constant conformity to the expression given to supreme will
as being the universal standard of rectitude.

What then is the object, the end in view, in allowing
to the suitor the faculty of recurrence to this universal standard from
law of justice? what then is the proper object – the proper end in view?
to maintain the conduct of the Judge, and thence of the people
in a state of conformity, to that supreme will – of conformity as
universal, and in every respect as perfect as possible: – to
maintain this conformity, and of course with as little collateral
inconvenience, in the shape of delay, vexation and expence,
as possible.

Thence crime If these considerations be just, they lead at
once to one fundamental rule or aphorism concerning
degrees of jurisdiction.

So far as matter of law is concerned,
1. The number of degrees of jurisdiction ought to be in regard to
every sort of suit, to be as small as possible – as small
as may be, prudential as well as physical practicability considered.

So far as matter of law is concerned
2. No degree of jurisdiction ought ever to be added, but for
some special reason cause, proving that for want of it the ends of
justice taken in the aggregate, fail of being fulfilled provided, or effectually
as they may be by means of it.


Identifier: | JB/106/151/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-7

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

151

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34739

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in