JB/106/208/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/208/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/208/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/208/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->25 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1806</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Seeing so much said about malâ fide causes, Your<lb/>
 
Lordship may perhaps be not incurious <add>deem it not altogether undeserving of notice</add> to know, what<lb/>
 
may reasonably be expected to be their proportion to <hi rend="underline">bonâ fide</hi><lb/>
 
causes.  My Lord, without <add>any expence if need</add> the end of any thing like <add>sagacity of</add> arithmetical<lb/>
skill or sagacity on my part, it is in my power<lb/>
to give to that question an answer which, I hope will be<lb/>
found satisfactory <add>sufficiently precise  tolerably precise</add>:  all from the prototype of the Chamber<lb/>
of Review, as depicted <add>determined</add> by the Committee on Finance.</p>
<p><add>Total</add> Number of causes in a year lodged in the Exchequer Chamber<lb/>
in an average of three year – minute fractions <add>and uncertainties</add> neglected – 606</p>
<p>Whereof argued, with or without any <del>expert</del> supposition<lb/>
of merits, or expectation of succeeding against the merits,<lb/>
and therefore not proved to be <add>on the part of the defendant</add> mala fide causes – 6</p>
<p>Remain unargued, argument not presenting to the eyes of<lb/>
the defendant or his professional advisers, any the faintest chance<lb/>
of success, and therefore all of them to a certainty on<lb/>
that same side malâ fide causes – 600.</p>
<p>In the mind of the learned <unclear>pleasure</unclear> of the <add>Scotch</add> Chamber of<lb/>
Review was there any assurance or prospect of seeing the<lb/>
proportion of <add>certainly</add> mala fide to possibly bonâ fide causes, as<lb/>
compared with the English proportions, lessened? – My Lord,<lb/>
<del>the</del> <add>from the first dawn of lineage <gap/> of reformation in Scotland the days of</add> English practice have been throughout, from L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Swinton in<lb/>
1789, till now in 1807, <add>such practice as Your Lordship has just been seeing</add> English practice has been the <unclear>ten</unclear><lb/>
plus ultra of profusion, in the imagination of the Scottish<lb/>
<add>reforming</add> lawyer.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:58, 27 August 2023

Click Here To Edit

25 Decr 1806

Seeing so much said about malâ fide causes, Your
Lordship may perhaps be not incurious deem it not altogether undeserving of notice to know, what
may reasonably be expected to be their proportion to bonâ fide
causes. My Lord, without any expence if need the end of any thing like sagacity of arithmetical
skill or sagacity on my part, it is in my power
to give to that question an answer which, I hope will be
found satisfactory sufficiently precise tolerably precise: all from the prototype of the Chamber
of Review, as depicted determined by the Committee on Finance.

Total Number of causes in a year lodged in the Exchequer Chamber
in an average of three year – minute fractions and uncertainties neglected – 606

Whereof argued, with or without any expert supposition
of merits, or expectation of succeeding against the merits,
and therefore not proved to be on the part of the defendant mala fide causes – 6

Remain unargued, argument not presenting to the eyes of
the defendant or his professional advisers, any the faintest chance
of success, and therefore all of them to a certainty on
that same side malâ fide causes – 600.

In the mind of the learned pleasure of the Scotch Chamber of
Review was there any assurance or prospect of seeing the
proportion of certainly mala fide to possibly bonâ fide causes, as
compared with the English proportions, lessened? – My Lord,
the from the first dawn of lineage of reformation in Scotland the days of English practice have been throughout, from Ld Swinton in
1789, till now in 1807, such practice as Your Lordship has just been seeing English practice has been the ten
plus ultra of profusion, in the imagination of the Scottish
reforming lawyer.


Identifier: | JB/106/208/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1806-12-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

19-20

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

208

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

verso

Page Numbering

e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

57871003

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in