JB/044/016/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/044/016/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/044/016/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/044/016/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>1821 Sept 29</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>But in these same articles in which endeavour is used to<lb/>
 
clear all political discussion from those irrelevant and mischievous<lb/>
 
arguments, by which the freedom of political discussion is endeavoured<lb/>
 
to be destroyed, I see other matter not only of a different but of an opposite<lb/>
tendency:  matters having, if not for their object, for their tendency,<lb/>
the suppression of relevant arguments:  of all such relevant arguments<lb/>
the force of which will be considered as bearing against the<lb/>
ordinances and measures of any such men as happen to be in<lb/>
power, whoever they may be.  Be this as it may, if these remedies<lb/>
against the abuse of religion are applied, the course I should be glad<lb/>
to see pursued, is – the discarding from these articles which have<lb/>
for their subject the abuse made of religion in this shape, all<lb/>
matter in which religion is not concerned.  The articles, to which<lb/>
this applies, are articles <gap/>:  Of this proposed separation, the objects<lb/>
are – clearness and conciseness:  clearness, by referring to the<lb/>
head of religion every thing that belongs to that head:  conciseness<lb/>
by the exclusion of needless repetitions.</p>
<p>But what, in this same view, I have to submitt to you,<lb/>
forms a collateral matter.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:42, 4 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1821 Sept 29

But in these same articles in which endeavour is used to
clear all political discussion from those irrelevant and mischievous
arguments, by which the freedom of political discussion is endeavoured
to be destroyed, I see other matter not only of a different but of an opposite
tendency: matters having, if not for their object, for their tendency,
the suppression of relevant arguments: of all such relevant arguments
the force of which will be considered as bearing against the
ordinances and measures of any such men as happen to be in
power, whoever they may be. Be this as it may, if these remedies
against the abuse of religion are applied, the course I should be glad
to see pursued, is – the discarding from these articles which have
for their subject the abuse made of religion in this shape, all
matter in which religion is not concerned. The articles, to which
this applies, are articles : Of this proposed separation, the objects
are – clearness and conciseness: clearness, by referring to the
head of religion every thing that belongs to that head: conciseness
by the exclusion of needless repetitions.

But what, in this same view, I have to submitt to you,
forms a collateral matter.


Identifier: | JB/044/016/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 44.

Date_1

1822-05-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

044

Main Headings

economy as to office

Folio number

016

Info in main headings field

econom &c

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

13801

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in