JB/054/012/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/054/012/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/012/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/012/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825 March 15<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head></p>
 
<p>Art.  Whatsoever can be done toward execution<lb/>
 
<del>must be done by</del> whether by Judge applicant or<lb/>
 
any other person must be done by communication:<lb/>
by communication between one person and another person,<lb/>
<add>and</add> or individually between some person and some thing.<lb/>
On the occasion of the application <del>the</del> communication has<lb/>
had place between the applicant and the Judge:  it has had<lb/>
place by means of a visit paid in public by the<lb/>
applicant to the Judge.</p>
<p>Art.  The communication or function will be<lb/>
either for the purpose either of probation, judicial probation<lb/>
or for the purpose of execution, judicial execution.</p>
<p>Probation itself – judicial probation – is itself<lb/>
a means and a necessary means of execution – judicial<lb/>
execution.  It is necessary not only to justify an operation<lb/>
to which the name of execution is attached, but also<lb/>
to cause execution to be performed to cause that <del>which</del><lb/>
operation by which execution and effect is <add>alledged to be</add> given to the <unclear>portion</unclear><lb/>
of <unclear>intimation</unclear> here in question to be what it is alledged and<lb/>
ought to be designed to be:  for without proof <add>made</add> that that<lb/>
<del>course which in the case in question</del> the state of things, in<lb/>
which an <del><gap/></del> alledged execution of the law in question the<lb/>
<del>service demanded by the applicant</del> rendering the service demanded<lb/>
by the applicant is of the number of those states of things in which<lb/>
it has been the intention of the law giver that the same service should<lb/>
be rendered which is<lb/>
necessary in that it<lb/>
should be proved <add>shewn</add> thus<lb/>
that that same individual<lb/>
state of things, is of the<lb/>
<gap/> of those states of things which are <add>were meant to be</add> designated by the general terms employed on that occasion by the lawyer in his <add>that</add> <unclear>time</unclear>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:46, 19 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1825 March 15
Procedure Code

Art. Whatsoever can be done toward execution
must be done by whether by Judge applicant or
any other person must be done by communication:
by communication between one person and another person,
and or individually between some person and some thing.
On the occasion of the application the communication has
had place between the applicant and the Judge: it has had
place by means of a visit paid in public by the
applicant to the Judge.

Art. The communication or function will be
either for the purpose either of probation, judicial probation
or for the purpose of execution, judicial execution.

Probation itself – judicial probation – is itself
a means and a necessary means of execution – judicial
execution. It is necessary not only to justify an operation
to which the name of execution is attached, but also
to cause execution to be performed to cause that which
operation by which execution and effect is alledged to be given to the portion
of intimation here in question to be what it is alledged and
ought to be designed to be: for without proof made that that
course which in the case in question the state of things, in
which an alledged execution of the law in question the
service demanded by the applicant rendering the service demanded
by the applicant is of the number of those states of things in which
it has been the intention of the law giver that the same service should
be rendered which is
necessary in that it
should be proved shewn thus
that that same individual
state of things, is of the
of those states of things which are were meant to be designated by the general terms employed on that occasion by the lawyer in his that time.


Identifier: | JB/054/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1825-03-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-7

Box

054

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

012

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17531

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in