JB/054/049/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/054/049/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/049/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/049/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1824. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 10<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head> <note>Ch. Nomenclature</note></p>
 
<p>As to other evidence, this will come to be spoken to<lb/>
 
when other parties in addition to the original applicant are brought<lb/>
 
upon the stage.</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">Reception</hi>  Maintain whatsoever evidence<lb/>
has been thus adduced by the applicant, <hi rend="underline">reception</hi> <add>by the Judge</add> has been<lb/>
given to it:  for to have heard it is to have received it.</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">Interrogation extraction</hi>.  Moreover if <del>any</del> to the<lb/>
direct end of justice any regard has been paid by the Judge,<lb/>
interrogations – questions as to various points belonging to the evidence<lb/>
so received have for the elucidation of the case been put <add><gap/></add><lb/>
to the applicant by the Judge.  To any one of those questions has<lb/>
any answer ben made?  If so, then in addition to the evidence<lb/>
spontaneously exhibited <add>on the one part</add> and on the other part <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">received</hi><lb/>
has <del><gap/></del> ulterior evidence been <hi rend="underline">extracted</hi>.</p>
<p><del><gap/></del> Addressed by a Judge to <del><gap/></del> an applicant<lb/>
or any other person subject to his authority, interrogation<lb/>
is <gap/>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:49, 19 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824. Decr. 10
Procedure Code Ch. Nomenclature

As to other evidence, this will come to be spoken to
when other parties in addition to the original applicant are brought
upon the stage.

Reception Maintain whatsoever evidence
has been thus adduced by the applicant, reception by the Judge has been
given to it: for to have heard it is to have received it.

Interrogation extraction. Moreover if any to the
direct end of justice any regard has been paid by the Judge,
interrogations – questions as to various points belonging to the evidence
so received have for the elucidation of the case been put
to the applicant by the Judge. To any one of those questions has
any answer ben made? If so, then in addition to the evidence
spontaneously exhibited on the one part and on the other part received
has ulterior evidence been extracted.

Addressed by a Judge to an applicant
or any other person subject to his authority, interrogation
is .


Identifier: | JB/054/049/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1824-12-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

50-52

Box

054

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

049

Info in main headings field

extracted from procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17568

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in