JB/067/282/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/067/282/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1825. Aug 27<lb/>
 
Penal Code<lb/>
 
4<lb/>
<unclear>1825 April 9</unclear></head>
<note>6<lb/>
One man kicks or<lb/>
spits upon another<lb/>
&#x2014; Spectators apply contempt<lb/>
to the sufferer &#x2014; approbation<lb/>
or indifference<lb/>
to the assailant</note>
<p>One man is seen giving a kick to or spitting<lb/>
in the face of another. In either case, without<lb/>
knowing any thing more of the intercourse<lb/>
which has had place between them, a member<lb/>
of spectators, seeing an recurrence of this sort in<lb/>
the street, will of course, without hesitation or<lb/>
reflection, under the impulse of a power, to the<lb/>
nature and existence of which, they are insensible,<lb/>
apply their disapprobation in the shape of contempt<lb/>
to the sufferer; regarding the assailant with eyes<lb/>
either of approbation or indifference.</p>
<note>7<lb/>
If wrongee suffers<lb/>
patiently &#x2014; contempt<lb/>
increases</note>
<p>If, by the persons by whom the injury is received,<lb/>
patience and resignation be manifested,<lb/>
the disapprobation &#x2014; the contempt &#x2014; far from being<lb/>
lessened, will in this case be rather increased.</p>
<note>8<lb/>
Reason &#x2014; the opinion<lb/>
took its rise in<lb/>
<unclear>barbarous</unclear> ages</note>
<p>The reason, is that in the barbarous ages<lb/>
in which this perverse opinion took its rise,<lb/>
fearlessness of death and wounds being a quality so<lb/>
universally necessary to public defence and self<lb/>
defence, was the one, principally not to say exclusively<lb/>
in honour: the one, without which no<lb/>
respect <add>food reputation</add> could be obtained or retained. If then the<lb/>
person thus dealt with were seen engaged at the<lb/>
time in a conflict with the assailant, no inference<lb/>
with regard to fearlessness, as above, could be deduced<lb/>
in the case of the one, any more than of the<lb/>
other: whereas, <del><gap/></del> if, while the one was seen inflicting<lb/>
the wrong, the other was seen patiently submitting<lb/>
to it, the inference would be obvious: on<lb/>
the part of the wrong doer, fearlessness; on the party<lb/>
wronged, timidity; incapacity of contributing to<lb/>
his own or the public defence.</p>
<note>why not fearlessness<lb/>
of wounds &#x2014; indifference<lb/>
to pain?</note>
<p><add>Thus</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:31, 19 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1825. Aug 27
Penal Code
4
1825 April 9
6
One man kicks or
spits upon another
— Spectators apply contempt
to the sufferer — approbation
or indifference
to the assailant

One man is seen giving a kick to or spitting
in the face of another. In either case, without
knowing any thing more of the intercourse
which has had place between them, a member
of spectators, seeing an recurrence of this sort in
the street, will of course, without hesitation or
reflection, under the impulse of a power, to the
nature and existence of which, they are insensible,
apply their disapprobation in the shape of contempt
to the sufferer; regarding the assailant with eyes
either of approbation or indifference.

7
If wrongee suffers
patiently — contempt
increases

If, by the persons by whom the injury is received,
patience and resignation be manifested,
the disapprobation — the contempt — far from being
lessened, will in this case be rather increased.

8
Reason — the opinion
took its rise in
barbarous ages

The reason, is that in the barbarous ages
in which this perverse opinion took its rise,
fearlessness of death and wounds being a quality so
universally necessary to public defence and self
defence, was the one, principally not to say exclusively
in honour: the one, without which no
respect food reputation could be obtained or retained. If then the
person thus dealt with were seen engaged at the
time in a conflict with the assailant, no inference
with regard to fearlessness, as above, could be deduced
in the case of the one, any more than of the
other: whereas, if, while the one was seen inflicting
the wrong, the other was seen patiently submitting
to it, the inference would be obvious: on
the part of the wrong doer, fearlessness; on the party
wronged, timidity; incapacity of contributing to
his own or the public defence.

why not fearlessness
of wounds — indifference
to pain?

Thus



Identifier: | JB/067/282/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 67.

Date_1

1825-08-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-8

Box

067

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

282

Info in main headings field

penal code

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

john neal

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

22115

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in