★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/068/001/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/068/001/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>4)</p> | |||
<p><head>Comm. Miscell.</head></p> | |||
<p>Under pain of being <del>excluded</del> <add>debarred</add> from the (benefits of) what is<lb/> | |||
thought the only liberal education.</p> | |||
<p>Till some rule is given for distinguishing a Law that<lb/> | |||
is so bad as to be contrary to a Law of Nature<lb/> | |||
from one that is simply bad without being contrary<lb/> | |||
to a Law of Nature, every Law that is<lb/> | |||
<add>a</add> bad <add>one</add> must be deemed to be contrary to a Law of<lb/> | |||
Nature. (Now when a man speaks of any Law<lb/> | |||
as being a bad one, he means one that he thinks<lb/> | |||
bad.) Now what any man means who speaks of a<lb/> | |||
law as being a bad one, is such an one as he<lb/> | |||
thinks so: in short any Law he does not like.<lb/> | |||
Bad <del>any</del> <add>and</add> good being words that necessarily refer to<lb/> | |||
the opinion <add>of liking</add> of him who uses them.</p> | |||
<p>When therefore a man is told that he ought to<lb/> | |||
transgress every human Law that is contrary to<lb/> | |||
the Law of Nature, he is (as good as) told neither<lb/> | |||
more nor less than that he ought to transgress<lb/> | |||
every human Law he does not like: or at least,<lb/> | |||
every Law he very much dislikes. This is, in a<lb/> | |||
manner every Law which there can be any use in<lb/> | |||
making. For as to a Law <add>mode of conduct</add> which a man does like,<lb/> | |||
there can be no use in making a Law to oblige<lb/> | |||
him to pursue it. Thus it is that this doctrine,</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
4)
Comm. Miscell.
Under pain of being excluded debarred from the (benefits of) what is
thought the only liberal education.
Till some rule is given for distinguishing a Law that
is so bad as to be contrary to a Law of Nature
from one that is simply bad without being contrary
to a Law of Nature, every Law that is
a bad one must be deemed to be contrary to a Law of
Nature. (Now when a man speaks of any Law
as being a bad one, he means one that he thinks
bad.) Now what any man means who speaks of a
law as being a bad one, is such an one as he
thinks so: in short any Law he does not like.
Bad any and good being words that necessarily refer to
the opinion of liking of him who uses them.
When therefore a man is told that he ought to
transgress every human Law that is contrary to
the Law of Nature, he is (as good as) told neither
more nor less than that he ought to transgress
every human Law he does not like: or at least,
every Law he very much dislikes. This is, in a
manner every Law which there can be any use in
making. For as to a Law mode of conduct which a man does like,
there can be no use in making a Law to oblige
him to pursue it. Thus it is that this doctrine,
Identifier: | JB/068/001/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 68. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
not numbered |
|||
068 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
001 |
comm. miscell. jurisp. crit. |
||
004 |
|||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
e1 / e2 / e3 / e4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
22196 |
|||