★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>March 18. 1826<lb/> | ||
Penal Code +<lb/> | |||
1 B.1. Gen Titles<lb/> | |||
Cap. V. State of the mind &c<lb/> | |||
1 § Evil consciousness.</head> | |||
<note>1<lb/> | |||
Degrees of blame<lb/> | |||
exemplifiable in<lb/> | |||
Evil consciousness<lb/> | |||
& temerity including<lb/> | |||
negligence</note> | |||
<p><del>How</del> <add>Of</add> the different degrees of blame exemplifiable<lb/> | |||
in the production of the same mischievous<lb/> | |||
result — of an offence of the same denomination:<lb/> | |||
to wit, Evil consciousness and Temerity,<lb/> | |||
including negligence.</p> | |||
<note>2<lb/> | |||
In English <del>bred</del> these<lb/> | |||
terms so applied are<lb/> | |||
new the ideas are new<lb/> | |||
In Rome-bred law the<lb/> | |||
same ideas expressed<lb/> | |||
(tho' inadequately) by<lb/> | |||
the words <hi rend="underline"><foreign>dolus</foreign></hi> and<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline"><foreign>culpa</foreign></hi></note> | |||
<p><add>Here is another distinction which</add> This distinction likewise pervades the<lb/> | |||
whole field of penal law. To an English reader,<lb/> | |||
the terms are new, and the ideas in a great<lb/> | |||
measure so; but the demand for the ideas &<lb/> | |||
therefore for the terms is all comprehensive. In<lb/> | |||
Roman <add>Rome-bred</add> Law, the ideas are not novel, and the<lb/> | |||
application <add>made</add> of them, though not all comprehensive<lb/> | |||
is extensive. In Rome-bred Law, the<lb/> | |||
idea here expressed by evil consciousness is expressed<lb/> | |||
by the term <hi rend="underline"><foreign>dolus</foreign></hi>, though it may already<lb/> | |||
perhaps be perceived, or at least suspected, how<lb/> | |||
<gap/> inadequately: the idea <add>here</add> expressed by<lb/> | |||
the word temerity, including negligence is expressed by the<lb/> | |||
word<del>s</del> <hi rend="underline"><foreign>culpa</foreign></hi>.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
March 18. 1826
Penal Code +
1 B.1. Gen Titles
Cap. V. State of the mind &c
1 § Evil consciousness.
1
Degrees of blame
exemplifiable in
Evil consciousness
& temerity including
negligence
How Of the different degrees of blame exemplifiable
in the production of the same mischievous
result — of an offence of the same denomination:
to wit, Evil consciousness and Temerity,
including negligence.
2
In English bred these
terms so applied are
new the ideas are new
In Rome-bred law the
same ideas expressed
(tho' inadequately) by
the words dolus and
culpa
Here is another distinction which This distinction likewise pervades the
whole field of penal law. To an English reader,
the terms are new, and the ideas in a great
measure so; but the demand for the ideas &
therefore for the terms is all comprehensive. In
Roman Rome-bred Law, the ideas are not novel, and the
application made of them, though not all comprehensive
is extensive. In Rome-bred Law, the
idea here expressed by evil consciousness is expressed
by the term dolus, though it may already
perhaps be perceived, or at least suspected, how
inadequately: the idea here expressed by
the word temerity, including negligence is expressed by the
words culpa.
|
Identifier: | JB/068/173/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 68. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-03-18 |
1-2 |
||
|
068 |
penal code |
||
|
173 |
penal code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / e1 |
||
|
john neal |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
22368 |
|||
