JB/042/182/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/182/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


<p><hi rend="underline">Checks</hi>.</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">Checks</hi>.</p>
<p>1. Anticedential Checks</p>
<p>1. Antecedential Checks</p>


<p><del>Art.1 Anticedential Checks.</del></p>
<p><del>Art.1 Antecedential Checks.</del></p>


<p>Art.1. Checks antecedential - applied to the<lb/>
<p>Art.1. Checks antecedential - applied to the<lb/>
conduct of <del>the</del><add>a</add> Judge anticedently to his entrance <del><gap/></del><lb/>
conduct of <del>the</del><add>a</add> Judge antecedently to his entrance <del>into</del><lb/>
upon service <del><gap/> as follows</del>- and forming so many securities<lb/>
upon service <del>are as follows</del>- and forming so many securities<lb/>
against misconduct in that <add>his</add> situation are as<lb/>
against misconduct in that <add>his</add> situation are as<lb/>
follows</p>
follows</p>
<note>1<lb/>
<note><!-- In pencil -->1<lb/>
Art.1. Anticedntial<lb/>
Art.1. Antecedntial<lb/>
I. Excluded all who<lb/>
I. Excluded all who<lb/>
have not proved appropriate<lb/>
have not proved appropriate<lb/>
aptitude by service<<lb/>
aptitude by service<lb/>
II - and by examination<lb/>
II - and by examination<lb/>
III - hereings habitually<lb/>
III - hereings habitually<lb/>
Line 31: Line 31:
These <add>securities</add> employed so <gap/><lb/>
These <add>securities</add> employed so <gap/><lb/>
at <del>par</del> these are persons<lb/>
at <del>par</del> these are persons<lb/>
capable o<f affording them.<lb/>
capable of affording them.<lb/>
IV<del>4</del>. Inaugural declaration <lb/>
IV<del>4</del>. Inaugural declaration <lb/>
with the responsibility<lb/>
with the responsibility<lb/>
Line 37: Line 37:
<del>alluded to the</del></note><lb/>
<del>alluded to the</del></note><lb/>


<p>1. Exclusive put upon all <add>Candidates for the situation</add> but such as in that<lb/>
<p>1. Exclusion put upon all <add>Candidates for the situation</add> but such as in that<lb/>
<del>situation</del> of Judge Depute have <del>not</del> given proof of appropriate<lb/>
<del>situation</del> of Judge Depute have <del>not</del> given proof of appropriate<lb/>
aptitude in all shapes in <add>by the <add>exercise</add></add><add><del>performance</del> of</add> <del>relation to the</del><lb/>
aptitude in all shapes in <add>by the <add>exercise</add></add><add><del>performance</del> of</add> <del>relation to the</del><lb/>
the same Functions under the superintendance of a principal<lb/>
the same Functions under the superintendance of a principal<lb/>
Judge: <add>see above. &sect;</add> <del>as per Ch. XI. &sect;. Location who</del></p>
Judge: <add>see above. &sect;</add> <del>as per Ch. XI. &sect;. Locable who</del></p>


<p>2. So, upon all, who have not stood the <del>notification</del><lb/>
<p>2. So, upon all, who have not stood the <del>notification</del><lb/>
test <del>of exercise</del> afforded by, subjection to <del>the</del><lb/>
test <del>of exercise</del> afforded by, subjection to <del>the</del><lb/>
interrogati<del>ve</del> scr<gap/>ting, <add>to <del>by</del> which a Candidate is subjected,</add> at the hands of all <add>who <del>that</del> chr<gap/> to apply it, as</add> <del>who</del> actors<lb/>
interrogati<del>ve</del> scrutiny, <add>to <del>by</del> which a Candidate is subjected,</add> at the hands of all <add>who <del>that</del> choose to apply it, as</add> <del>who</del> actors<lb/>
in <add>one or <del>two</del> more</add> <del>d<gap/></del> judicial theatres, <add>See above S.</add> <del>as per Ch. XI. &sect;</del><lb/>
in <add>one or <del>two</del> more</add> <del>d<gap/></del> judicial theatres, <add>See above S.</add> <del>as per Ch. XI. &sect;</del><lb/>
<del>who</del></p>
<del>who</del></p>


<p>3. <del><gap/></del> So, upon all persons, who have <add>been practitioner,</add> <del>practiced</del><lb/>
<p>3. <del><gap/></del> So, upon all persons, who have <add>been practitioners,</add> <del>practiced</del><lb/>
in the profession, by which men are habituated to the defence<lb/>
in the profession, by which men are habituated to the defence<lb/>
of wrong, <add>to <del>safe consensus</del> the</add>
of wrong, <add>to <del>safe consensus</del> the</add>
Line 73: Line 73:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824. Feby. 27

Constitutional Code. Ch. XII Immediate Judge
S. Checks.

1. Anticedented

Checks.

1. Antecedential Checks

Art.1 Antecedential Checks.

Art.1. Checks antecedential - applied to the
conduct of thea Judge antecedently to his entrance into
upon service are as follows- and forming so many securities
against misconduct in that his situation are as
follows

1
Art.1. Antecedntial
I. Excluded all who
have not proved appropriate
aptitude by service
II - and by examination
III - hereings habitually
to defence of errors and
knowlingly false assertion
These securities employed so
at par these are persons
capable of affording them.
IV4. Inaugural declaration
with the responsibility
to follow Tribunal
alluded to the

1. Exclusion put upon all Candidates for the situation but such as in that
situation of Judge Depute have not given proof of appropriate
aptitude in all shapes in by the <add>exercise</add>performance of relation to the
the same Functions under the superintendance of a principal
Judge: see above. § as per Ch. XI. §. Locable who

2. So, upon all, who have not stood the notification
test of exercise afforded by, subjection to the
interrogative scrutiny, to by which a Candidate is subjected, at the hands of all who that choose to apply it, as who actors
in one or two more d judicial theatres, See above S. as per Ch. XI. §
who

3. So, upon all persons, who have been practitioners, practiced
in the profession, by which men are habituated to the defence
of wrong, to safe consensus the utterance of assertions known by them falshood, with the
to be false.

These three securities as soon appli employed in
the case of all new men, so soon as men, in the situation of Judge exercised
Deputes, in the sole endeavour to promote justice, without
the practice of falshood because without benefit from need of it or benefit
from it, have been framed.

4. The obligation contracted, and responsibility incurred, by the public utterance
of the Judge's Inaugural Declaration, antecedently
to entrance into Office. See above, §.


5. The interdiction put upon all emolument
in any shape other than that of which in the eyes of all men universally known
stands attached to the office by law.



Identifier: | JB/042/182/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1832-05-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

182

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c8 / c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13105

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in