JB/042/189/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/189/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
<head>Constitutional Code.</head>
<head>Constitutional Code.</head>


<note>Ch. XII. Judication collateral<lb/>
<note>Ch. XII. Judication collectively<lb/>
<del>Ch. IX Minister collectively</del><lb/>
<del>Ch. IX Ministers collectively</del><lb/>
&sect;.1. Excepted Judicatories<lb/>
&sect;.1. Excepted Judicatories<lb/>
S. <del>Oppression obviated</del></note><lb/>
S. <del>Oppression obviated</del></note><lb/>
Line 19: Line 19:
&amp; in Judge's situation</note><lb/>
&amp; in Judge's situation</note><lb/>


Art 6 In the case of this sort of Excepted Judicatory preceding,<lb/>
<p>Art 6 In the case of this sort of Excepted Judicatory the proceeding,<lb/>
will not be <gap/>ably different from those of the ordinary<lb/>
will not be materially different from those of the ordinary<lb/>
judicator, for the most apt modes <add>best adopted means</add> of coming <gap/> the truth<lb/>
judicator, for the most apt modes <add>best adapted means</add> of coming at the truth<lb/>
in regard to the relevant facts <add>as well</add> are the same <add>in every case</add> in relation to <lb/>
in regard to the relevant facts <add>as well</add> are the same <add>in every case</add> in relation to <lb/>
every sort of act.  The only change will be that which respects<lb/>
every sort of act.  The only change will be that which respects <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> not at all affected<lb/>
by the situation, form <lb/>
and magnitude of<lb/>
the slices of jurisdiction<lb/>
carried out  in terms of<lb/>
antient barbar<gap/></note><lb/>
the <add><del>degree of</del> <gap/> natural</add> <del>class of functionaries</del> degree of natural promptitude, and<lb/>
the <add><del>degree of</del> <gap/> natural</add> <del>class of functionaries</del> degree of natural promptitude, and<lb/>
that which regards the situation of the temporary Judge. The time<lb/>
that which regards the situation of the temporary Judge. The time<lb/>
when <add>by which</add>  a Judge whose situation<add>sent</add> is at a considerable and <unclear>indeterment</unclear><lb/>
when <add>by which</add>  a Judge whose situation<add>suit</add> is at a considerable and <unclear>indeterment</unclear><lb/>
can be called in case not be wanted for, and the ordinary Judge<lb/>
can be called in can not be wanted for, and the ordinary Judge<lb/>
having little or no acquaintance will the<add>details of the</add> business of the office in<lb/>
having little or no acquaintance will the<add>details of the</add> business of the office in <note>2<lb/>
In these cases time<lb/>
for calling in the ordinary<lb/>
Judge cannot be waited<lb/>
for besides that the<lb/>
ordinary judge might<lb/>
have less cognitional<lb/>
aptitude</note><lb/>
question would probably be in the first instance, in respect of<lb/>
question would probably be in the first instance, in respect of<lb/>
 
cognitional and judicative aptitude to less apt than the<lb/>
particular <add>special</add> Judge have substituted to him.  True it that in<lb/>
the case proposed the <del><gap/></del> <add>cause in which</add> special Judge would not <del><gap/></del> be<lb/>
might without impropriety be termed his own cause.<lb/>
but the facility of Appeal being in their case as in all <lb/>
other cases under the present <gap/>uch maximized, the evil would<lb/>
be nominal only not real and effective: the <del>idea of</del> evil<lb/>
appointed in idea with the phrase Judge <gap/>bers even cause<lb/>
self-judication system having for its origin the <add>evil</add>evils which<lb/>
for want of the facility in question has at all times and every<lb/>
where been exemplified in such disastrous abundance.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1826. June 30

Constitutional Code.

Ch. XII. Judication collectively
Ch. IX Ministers collectively
§.1. Excepted Judicatories
S. Oppression obviated

III. Quasi Resubordination

Art 6 Chief difference
between this & ordinary
judicatories in the natural
degree of natural promptitude
& in Judge's situation

Art 6 In the case of this sort of Excepted Judicatory the proceeding,
will not be materially different from those of the ordinary
judicator, for the most apt modes best adapted means of coming at the truth
in regard to the relevant facts as well are the same in every case in relation to
every sort of act. The only change will be that which respects [+] not at all affected
by the situation, form
and magnitude of
the slices of jurisdiction
carried out in terms of
antient barbar

the degree of natural class of functionaries degree of natural promptitude, and
that which regards the situation of the temporary Judge. The time
when by which a Judge whose situationsuit is at a considerable and indeterment
can be called in can not be wanted for, and the ordinary Judge
having little or no acquaintance will thedetails of the business of the office in 2
In these cases time
for calling in the ordinary
Judge cannot be waited
for besides that the
ordinary judge might
have less cognitional
aptitude

question would probably be in the first instance, in respect of
cognitional and judicative aptitude to less apt than the
particular special Judge have substituted to him. True it that in
the case proposed the cause in which special Judge would not be
might without impropriety be termed his own cause.
but the facility of Appeal being in their case as in all
other cases under the present uch maximized, the evil would
be nominal only not real and effective: the idea of evil
appointed in idea with the phrase Judge bers even cause
self-judication system having for its origin the evilevils which
for want of the facility in question has at all times and every
where been exemplified in such disastrous abundance.




Identifier: | JB/042/189/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-06-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

189

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c6 / c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13112

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in