JB/042/205/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/205/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1828 Sept. 12. 5<lb/>
Constitutional Code</head>
 
<note>Note<lb/>
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
&sect;.2. Actors in the Judicial theatre</note>
 
<p>5</p>
 
<p>Cop<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></p>
 
<!-- The following 3 paras are deleted -->
<p><hi rend="underline">Instructional</hi><lb/>
Art. 3. <del>In the</del> Of the <del><gap/></del> sorts of services <del><gap/></del><lb/>
performed by a Judge as such, the most ordinary is that<lb/>
which consists in taking a cognizance of a <hi rend="underline">suit at law</hi><hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> at<lb/>
its commencement: and thereto giving continuance and termination<lb/>
as to him seems meet.</p>
 
<p>But to this same functionary <add>performer</add> acting as such <hi rend="underline">application</hi><lb/>
not only requires to be made, but, in ordinary course <add>is</add> actually<lb/>
wont to be made for other purposes. <hi rend="underline">Application</hi> and <hi rend="underline">applicant</hi><lb/>
are therefore <hi rend="underline">appellations</hi> which require to be brought<lb/>
forward in the first instance antecedently to <hi rend="underline">suit</hi> and <hi rend="underline"><unclear>suitor</unclear></hi></p>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Instructional</hi> <hi rend="underline">Expositive</hi><lb/>
Art. <!-- blank --> <del>On <gap/> such</del> <hi rend="underline">Sides</hi> in a suit, two &#x2014; the Pursuers<lb/>
and the Defendants. In some instances there have been said<lb/>
to be three But the three will be <del>found</del> <add>it is <gap/></add> in every case <unclear>find reduction</unclear>.<lb/>
Be the individual who he may, he will to the eyes<lb/>
of the Judge present himself as <gap/> that <del>that which</del> the service<lb/>
<del>which is <gap/></del> <add>applied for</add> to <add>shall</add> be rendered, <del><gap/></del> or he is not: if yes, his<lb/>
station is on the pursuers <del><gap/></del> side; if not, on the defendants<lb/>
side.</p>
 
<!-- The following note appears to have been deleted -->
<head>Note <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi></head>
 
<p>(a) <del>To</del> An appellation customarily employed &#x2014; in the English language<lb/>
in particular as synonymous to a <hi rend="underline">suit</hi>, is a <hi rend="underline">cause</hi>: but<lb/>
such is the ambiguity resulting from the other import &#x2014; the logical<lb/>
or as some would say the metaphysical import given to this same<lb/>
word, that throughout the present work it has seemed advisable to<lb/>
abstain from giving any employment to it. <hi rend="underline">Suit</hi> has for its conjugates<lb/>
to sue, to pursue, <unclear>Suer</unclear> &#x2014;Pursuer, Pursuit: <hi rend="underline">cause</hi>, employed in this sense, has no such conjugates</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1828 Sept. 12. 5
Constitutional Code

Note
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.2. Actors in the Judicial theatre

5

Copd

Instructional
Art. 3. In the Of the sorts of services
performed by a Judge as such, the most ordinary is that
which consists in taking a cognizance of a suit at law(a) at
its commencement: and thereto giving continuance and termination
as to him seems meet.

But to this same functionary performer acting as such application
not only requires to be made, but, in ordinary course is actually
wont to be made for other purposes. Application and applicant
are therefore appellations which require to be brought
forward in the first instance antecedently to suit and suitor

Instructional Expositive
Art. On such Sides in a suit, two — the Pursuers
and the Defendants. In some instances there have been said
to be three But the three will be found it is in every case find reduction.
Be the individual who he may, he will to the eyes
of the Judge present himself as that that which the service
which is applied for to shall be rendered, or he is not: if yes, his
station is on the pursuers side; if not, on the defendants
side.

Note (a)

(a) To An appellation customarily employed — in the English language
in particular as synonymous to a suit, is a cause: but
such is the ambiguity resulting from the other import — the logical
or as some would say the metaphysical import given to this same
word, that throughout the present work it has seemed advisable to
abstain from giving any employment to it. Suit has for its conjugates
to sue, to pursue, Suer —Pursuer, Pursuit: cause, employed in this sense, has no such conjugates




Identifier: | JB/042/205/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1828-09-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

205

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

note (a)

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13128

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in