JB/042/222/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/222/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
Art. 10. Adequate, it is believed, to <del><gap/></del> the purpose<lb/>
Art. 10. Adequate, it is believed, to <del><gap/></del> the purpose<lb/>
of giving, in the most effectual manner, and with least delay<lb/>
of giving, in the most effectual manner, and with least delay<lb/>
vexation and <sic>expence</sic>, <del>will be found to be</del> <add>to the aggregate of the mandates, efficient by the aggregate body of the Judges, is</add> the aggregate of the<lb/>
vexation and <sic>expence</sic>, <del>will be found to be</del> <add>to the aggregate of the mandates, <unclear>efficient</unclear> by the aggregate body of the Judges, is</add> the aggregate of the<lb/>
function, <del><gap/> allotted</del> in <add>and by</add> this Code <add>allotted, to the aggregate of</add> to <del>wit in the <gap/><lb/>
function, <del><gap/> allotted</del> in <add>and by</add> this Code <add>allotted, to the aggregate of</add> <del>to wit in the <gap/><lb/>
applying to</del> <add>the functionaries belonging to</add> the Judicial Department: adequate <del>to the purpose</del><lb/>
applying to</del> <add>the functionaries belonging to</add> the Judicial Department: adequate <del>to the purpose</del><lb/>
or at any rate not wanting much of being so, in respect <add>not only</add> of<lb/>
or at any rate not wanting much of being so, in respect <add>not only</add> of<lb/>
Line 34: Line 34:
these several requisites will the arrangements in the English<lb/>
these several requisites will the arrangements in the English<lb/>
body of law &#x2014; real and fictitious &#x2014; Statute <add>law</add> and so called Common<lb/>
body of law &#x2014; real and fictitious &#x2014; Statute <add>law</add> and so called Common<lb/>
Law put together &#x2014; be found to fall short as above, than <gap/> in<lb/>
Law put together &#x2014; be found to fall short as above, than <del><gap/></del> in<lb/>
<del>most <unclear>inapt</unclear> of the arrangements of</del> <add>any of</add> the Codes having for their<lb/>
<del>most <unclear>inapt</unclear> of the arrangements of</del> <add>any of</add> the Codes having for their<lb/>
ground the Roman Law. Witness the examples following</p>
ground the Roman Law. Witness the examples following</p>
Line 49: Line 49:


<p>3. So, in Equity Procedure for Chancery Judges and Procedure, and <note>Exchequer Judges and Procedure.<hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi></note><lb/>
<p>3. So, in Equity Procedure for Chancery Judges and Procedure, and <note>Exchequer Judges and Procedure.<hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi></note><lb/>
Officers in some respects different, and acting by different rules.</p>
<del>Officers in some respects different, and acting by different rules.</del></p>


<!-- This para is deleted -->4. That Exchequer Judges and Procedures, <gap/><gap/><gap/> officers <note>acting by different Rules<lb/>
<!-- This para is deleted -->4. That Exchequer Judges and Procedures, <gap/><gap/><gap/> officers <note>acting by different Rules<lb/>
Line 61: Line 61:
Procedure on the other part.<!-- Paragraph mark --><lb/>
Procedure on the other part.<!-- Paragraph mark --><lb/>
<lb/>
<lb/>
Note here that each Exchequer Judge is a compound of two mutually non-intercommunicating beings.<hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi></note>
Note here that each Exchequer Judge is a compound of two mutually non-intercommunicating beings.<hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi></note><lb/>
<note><!-- Right margin --><hi rend="superscript"><gap/></hi> each looking different ways each impeding the motion of the other, <add>in</add> <add>in having powers for tying together hands and stopping the feet of the other</add> and neither of them knowing <del>what the other <gap/> thinks or <gap/></del> <add>what passes within the others mind.</add><hi rend="superscript">[+]3</hi></note>
<note><!-- Right margin --><hi rend="superscript"><gap/></hi> each looking different ways each impeding the motion of the other, <add>in</add> <add>in having powers for tying together hands and stopping the feet of the other</add> and neither of them knowing <del>what the other <gap/> thinks or <gap/></del> <add>what passes within the others mind.</add><hi rend="superscript">[+]3</hi></note>


Line 81: Line 81:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1827. May 8 5
Constitutional Code Copd

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.3. Judiciary functionaries

5

Instructional. Exemplificative
Art. 10. Adequate, it is believed, to the purpose
of giving, in the most effectual manner, and with least delay
vexation and expence, will be found to be to the aggregate of the mandates, efficient by the aggregate body of the Judges, is the aggregate of the
function, allotted in and by this Code allotted, to the aggregate of to wit in the
applying to
the functionaries belonging to the Judicial Department: adequate to the purpose
or at any rate not wanting much of being so, in respect not only of
clearness comprehensiveness, but also of clearness and
comprehensiveness,
clearness and simplicity: clearness to the
exclusion of obscurity and ambiguity; simplicity, or say non-
complexity
or non-complicatedness, for the sake of clearness.

Instructional
Art. 11. In respect of these several desirable properties,
in a greater or less degree, will it is believed be found to fall short of these
be found to be the provision made aggregate of the arrangements that have in every other as yet established
Pannomion, in whatsoever nation established.

Instructional. Exemplificative
Art. 12. In a much greater degree, in respect of
these several requisites will the arrangements in the English
body of law — real and fictitious — Statute law and so called Common
Law put together — be found to fall short as above, than in
most inapt of the arrangements of any of the Codes having for their
ground the Roman Law. Witness the examples following

1. For In Westminster Hall Procedures, for Common Law Judges and correspondent Common Law Procedure so called in contradistinction to Equity Judges and correspondent Equity Procedure
one a different set of ministerial officers functionaries acting by one a different set of rules,

2. For so called the species of Law called Equity with
its Judges and correspondent Procedure another a different set of ministerial
officers acting by a different set of rules,

2. For So, for in Common Law Procedure, for Kings Bench Common Law Judges and Procedure, and and
Common Plea Common Law Common Pleas Judges and Procedure. of Ministerial

3. So, in Equity Procedure for Chancery Judges and Procedure, and Exchequer Judges and Procedure.[+]1
Officers in some respects different, and acting by different rules.

4. That Exchequer Judges and Procedures, officers acting by different Rules
Each Equity Judge
sort of Monster composed
of two such as not to
be seen
glewed together

[+]1 4. So in Common Law Procedure, for Exchequer Judges and Procedure on the one part and Kings Bench Judges and Procedure and Common Pleas Judges and
Procedure on the other part.

Note here that each Exchequer Judge is a compound of two mutually non-intercommunicating beings.[+]2

each looking different ways each impeding the motion of the other, in in having powers for tying together hands and stopping the feet of the other and neither of them knowing what the other thinks or what passes within the others mind.[+]3

[+]3 Similar to Of this factitious
monster a representative may be seen a
may be found natural representation in the sort
of foetus composed of
a pair of twins glewed
back to back by the
hand of Nature

5. For So In Justice-of-Peace Law, are Judges and correspondent as
Procedures another a different set of Ministerial Officers, acting by a different
set of rules.
as contradistinguished from Westminster Hall Law
Judges and Procedure are still more widely different as between one and the other
sort of law.




Identifier: | JB/042/222/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1827-05-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

222

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

instructional / instructional exemplificative

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d5/ e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1826

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1826

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13145

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in