★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825 Nov. 7<lb/> | |||
Constitutional Law</head> | |||
<note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/> | |||
Ch. IX. <unclear>Minister</unclear><lb/> | |||
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/> | |||
<unclear>First Number in for Judicially</unclear> <add>an Office</add></note> | |||
<p>7</p> | |||
<!-- The remainder of the page is deleted --> | |||
<p>Taking in hand the French and English systems <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
upon the supposition of the correctness of the <unclear>opening</unclear> <add>known</add> above <add><unclear>determined</unclear></add> advanced,<lb/> | |||
on a <add>a very</add> slight <add>and general</add> acquaintance <del><gap/></del> this would enable<lb/> | |||
any man to afford a strong and <unclear>instructive</unclear><lb/> | |||
illustration of them</p> | |||
<p>In the French system, he will see error and an<lb/> | |||
<unclear>seating</unclear>: error in principle, enacting in the application.</p> | |||
<p>In the English he will see throughout the <unclear>above</unclear><lb/> | |||
of all principle, the <del><gap/></del> gr<gap/> in<gap/>, and in the<lb/> | |||
result of at the thickest confusion throughout the whole of its<lb/> | |||
texture.</p> | |||
<p>In the French system suits being classed according to the<lb/> | |||
supposed <unclear>order of the importance</unclear> he will observe allotted<lb/> | |||
to those to which the least importance is ascribed, single-<lb/> | |||
seated <unclear>justices</unclear>: to those to which the highest degree of importance<lb/> | |||
is ascribed the greatest number of Judges: and not <add><unclear>as to expense</unclear></add> only<lb/> | |||
the greatest number of Judges but to such of them the highest<lb/> | |||
<unclear>rate of remuneration</unclear></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1825 Nov. 7
Constitutional Law
2o
Ch. IX. Minister
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
First Number in for Judicially an Office
7
Taking in hand the French and English systems
upon the supposition of the correctness of the opening known above determined advanced,
on a a very slight and general acquaintance this would enable
any man to afford a strong and instructive
illustration of them
In the French system, he will see error and an
seating: error in principle, enacting in the application.
In the English he will see throughout the above
of all principle, the gr in, and in the
result of at the thickest confusion throughout the whole of its
texture.
In the French system suits being classed according to the
supposed order of the importance he will observe allotted
to those to which the least importance is ascribed, single-
seated justices: to those to which the highest degree of importance
is ascribed the greatest number of Judges: and not as to expense only
the greatest number of Judges but to such of them the highest
rate of remuneration
|
Identifier: | JB/042/245/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-11-07 |
15-19 |
||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
245 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
13168 |
|||
