JB/042/257/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/257/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1826. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 7<lb/>
Constitutional Code</head>
 
<note>Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
&sect;.5. Number in a judicatory</note>
 
<p>2</p>
 
<note>4<lb/>
Art. 4. 2. <add>Of</add> Mutual<lb/>
<del>conduct</del> <sic>controul</sic> on misconduct<lb/>
the need is<lb/>
superseded by Securities<lb/>
for appropriate aptitude<lb/>
as per &sect; <!-- blank -->.</note>
 
<p>Ratiocinative<lb/>
Art. 4. 2 From any addition to number one in a Judicatory<lb/>
the sole ground <add>only beneficial effect</add> the which can be expected, with<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> relation to the <unclear>ends</unclear> of Judicatories are those of a check to misconduct<lb/>
<del>on the part</del> and in particular to <del>that which is the</del> <add>misconduct in those</add><lb/>
shapes in which it is the result of deficiency in respect of<lb/>
appropriate moral aptitude on the part of the <del>first</del> Judge<lb/>
first constituted: but against <del>this</del> any such <del>security <gap/></del> deficiency<lb/>
other <unclear>security</unclear> and ample securities are provided in abundance,<lb/>
as to which see &sect;. <!-- blank --> Securities &amp;c</p>
 
<note>5<lb/>
Art. 5. 3. Weakness of<lb/>
such mutual <sic>controul</sic>.<lb/>
By the President <del><gap/><lb/>
<gap/></del> in whom reposes<lb/>
the confidence from above<lb/>
the whole life of every<lb/>
colleague by whom<lb/>
his will is opposed<lb/>
may be made uncomfortable</note>
 
<p>Ratiocinative<lb/>
Art. 5. 3. As to this check, weak and <del><gap/></del> inefficient<lb/>
will it be seen to be. By opposition to <del><add>the will of</add></del> his colleagues the <del><gap/></del><lb/>
Judge whose location is the result of the first <unclear>chosen</unclear> &#x2014; by opposition<lb/>
to the will of this his superior the <unclear>inferior</unclear> might <del>lose suf</del><lb/>
lose the whole comfort of the <unclear>official</unclear> part of his life: by acquiescence<lb/>
no less does he <del>sustain</del> <add>suffer</add> in any shape. <del>Only therefore</del> <add>No greater things</add><lb/>
than <del><gap/> <gap/></del> what to him appears necessary to save himself<lb/>
from positive <del><gap/></del> censure at the hands of <del><gap/></del> superordinates, will<lb/>
and <del><gap/></del> from being regarded by them as a cypher, will<lb/>
be the part taken by him in the business</p>
 
<note>6<lb/>
Art. 6. 4. Hence none<lb/>
but the presiding Judge<lb/>
has adequate motives<lb/>
for the exertion necessary<lb/>
to <del><gap/></del> create and preserve<lb/>
intellectual and<lb/>
active aptitude.</note>
 
<p>Ratiocinative<lb/>
Art. 6. 4. <del>4. To</del> <add>From the efficiency</add> of the checks thus applied to misconduct<lb/>
<add><del>in the <gap/></del> through moral inaptitude</add> on the part of the first <unclear>chosen</unclear> Judge as <add>from</add> the value of <del>the affection</del> <add>any <unclear>add</unclear></add><lb/>
<del>capable of being</del> supplement capable of being made to his<lb/>
<add>appropriate</add> intellectual aptitude a cause of <del>deficiency</del> <add>defalcation</add> may be <unclear>seen</unclear> by<lb/>
that produced in <add>the defalcation made from</add> his <del><gap/></del> own intellectual <add>and active</add> aptitude by the<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <unclear>proper</unclear> produced for want of adequate <del>cause of</del> motives <del>of</del><lb/>
for exertion as above</p>
 
<note>7<lb/>
Art. 5. Yet, as the<lb/>
President may place<lb/>
more or less <del><gap/></del><lb/>
reliance on the others,<lb/>
thus is aptitude diminished<lb/>
<unclear>on all</unclear><lb/>
sides.</note>
 
<p>Ratiocinative<lb/>
Art. 7. In this way it is that when his Judges are<lb/>
placed in the same judicatory with powers universally the same,<lb/>
<del>each of them the</del> appropriate aptitude in its several branches<lb/>
is diminished by the <del><gap/></del> <unclear>coexistence</unclear> of the others</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1826. Decr. 7
Constitutional Code

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.5. Number in a judicatory

2

4
Art. 4. 2. Of Mutual
conduct controul on misconduct
the need is
superseded by Securities
for appropriate aptitude
as per § .

Ratiocinative
Art. 4. 2 From any addition to number one in a Judicatory
the sole ground only beneficial effect the which can be expected, with
relation to the ends of Judicatories are those of a check to misconduct
on the part and in particular to that which is the misconduct in those
shapes in which it is the result of deficiency in respect of
appropriate moral aptitude on the part of the first Judge
first constituted: but against this any such security deficiency
other security and ample securities are provided in abundance,
as to which see §. Securities &c

5
Art. 5. 3. Weakness of
such mutual controul.
By the President
in whom reposes
the confidence from above
the whole life of every
colleague by whom
his will is opposed
may be made uncomfortable

Ratiocinative
Art. 5. 3. As to this check, weak and inefficient
will it be seen to be. By opposition to the will of his colleagues the
Judge whose location is the result of the first chosen — by opposition
to the will of this his superior the inferior might lose suf
lose the whole comfort of the official part of his life: by acquiescence
no less does he sustain suffer in any shape. Only therefore No greater things
than what to him appears necessary to save himself
from positive censure at the hands of superordinates, will
and from being regarded by them as a cypher, will
be the part taken by him in the business

6
Art. 6. 4. Hence none
but the presiding Judge
has adequate motives
for the exertion necessary
to create and preserve
intellectual and
active aptitude.

Ratiocinative
Art. 6. 4. 4. To From the efficiency of the checks thus applied to misconduct
in the through moral inaptitude on the part of the first chosen Judge as from the value of the affection any add
capable of being supplement capable of being made to his
appropriate intellectual aptitude a cause of deficiency defalcation may be seen by
that produced in the defalcation made from his own intellectual and active aptitude by the
proper produced for want of adequate cause of motives of
for exertion as above

7
Art. 5. Yet, as the
President may place
more or less
reliance on the others,
thus is aptitude diminished
on all
sides.

Ratiocinative
Art. 7. In this way it is that when his Judges are
placed in the same judicatory with powers universally the same,
each of them the appropriate aptitude in its several branches
is diminished by the coexistence of the others




Identifier: | JB/042/257/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-12-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-7

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

257

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

ratiocinative

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1826

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1826

Notes public

ID Number

13180

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in