★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
Auto approved |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1831 July 20<lb/> | |||
Constitutional Code ++</head> | |||
<note>Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/> | |||
§.6. Fields of Service<lb/> | |||
2 Logical field.<lb/> | |||
14</note> | |||
<p>8 <del><gap/></del></p> | |||
<p><!-- This para is deleted -->☞ <gap/> before with 1.1 <hi rend="underline">Excepted<lb/> | |||
Judicatories</hi> and settle both together</p> | |||
<note>13 <del>19</del></note> | |||
<p><hi rend="underline">Ratiocinative</hi><lb/> | |||
Art. 13. <del>Art. 14. 19.</del> Why <del><gap/></del> with the exception abovementioned,<lb/> | |||
render the logical fields of all these Judicatories all-comprehensive?<lb/> | |||
Answer. Reasons</p> | |||
<note>i</note> | |||
<p>i. By any division <add>made,</add> of the sorts of seats, among different<lb/> | |||
<add>sorts of</add> Judicatories, <hi rend="underline">complication</hi> would be established: <del>that</del><lb/> | |||
which complication, is <add>altogether</add> needless, <del>is</del> altogether useless, and<lb/> | |||
would be purely mischievous.</p> | |||
<note>ii</note> | |||
<p>ii. <del>2.</del> Mischievous it would be in proportion to the<lb/> | |||
number of fractions into which the logical field were thus<lb/> | |||
broken: even supposing <add>the limits of</add> them, every one of them, ever so<lb/> | |||
clearly <del>defin</del> determined and <del>defined</del> described.</p> | |||
<note>iii</note> | |||
<p>iii 3 Adjusting to boundaries between one sort of suit and<lb/> | |||
another <del>would</del> is in its nature a work of the utmost <gap/>,<lb/> | |||
not capable of being performed with any tolerable degree of accuracy<lb/> | |||
without a most correct and all comprehensive conception of the whole<lb/> | |||
field of law and legislation: and, were in that case <del><gap/></del> <add>scarcely</add><lb/> | |||
capable of being performed without giving rise to <del>incidents,</del> <add><hi rend="underline">doubts</hi> and <hi rend="underline">disputes</hi>,</add> and<lb/> | |||
thence to <hi rend="underline">suits</hi> — in <unclear>a</unclear> number indeterminate, and all of them<lb/> | |||
purely mischievous: <del>with</del> <add>add, to which —</add> jealousies and conflicts of authority<lb/> | |||
between Judge and Judge: all which conflicts are, by this simplicity<lb/> | |||
of contrivance, completely obviated.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1831 July 20
Constitutional Code ++
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.6. Fields of Service
2 Logical field.
14
8
☞ before with 1.1 Excepted
Judicatories and settle both together
13 19
Ratiocinative
Art. 13. Art. 14. 19. Why with the exception abovementioned,
render the logical fields of all these Judicatories all-comprehensive?
Answer. Reasons
i
i. By any division made, of the sorts of seats, among different
sorts of Judicatories, complication would be established: that
which complication, is altogether needless, is altogether useless, and
would be purely mischievous.
ii
ii. 2. Mischievous it would be in proportion to the
number of fractions into which the logical field were thus
broken: even supposing the limits of them, every one of them, ever so
clearly defin determined and defined described.
iii
iii 3 Adjusting to boundaries between one sort of suit and
another would is in its nature a work of the utmost ,
not capable of being performed with any tolerable degree of accuracy
without a most correct and all comprehensive conception of the whole
field of law and legislation: and, were in that case scarcely
capable of being performed without giving rise to incidents, doubts and disputes, and
thence to suits — in a number indeterminate, and all of them
purely mischievous: with add, to which — jealousies and conflicts of authority
between Judge and Judge: all which conflicts are, by this simplicity
of contrivance, completely obviated.
|
Identifier: | JB/042/271/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1831-07-20 |
13 |
||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
271 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
ratiocinative |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
13194 |
|||
