★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1824. April 2 +<lb/> | |||
Constitutional Code Cop<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></head> | |||
<note>ult<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/> | |||
Ch. XI. Judiciary collectively<lb/> | |||
§. Intercommunity of<lb/> | |||
service</note> | |||
<p>5</p> | |||
<p><del>Art. 10. Of <add>As between</add> <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> <add><gap/><gap/><gap/></add><lb/> | |||
the execution of which place, <add>of the <gap/></add> the execution of the other would<lb/> | |||
if at the same point of time would be <add>is</add> impossible this</del><lb/> | |||
Art. 10. As between two such conflicting orders, the prevalence<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/> preference belongs <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
belongs <del>in the first instance</del> to that one to<lb/> | |||
which execution <del>was</del> <add>is</add> first begun to be given.</p> | |||
<p>Art. <del>12</del> 11 <del>In</del> <add>But, in</add> case of disagreement, <del>between the invading</del> <add>the prevalence</add><lb/> | |||
belongs provisionally to the orders of the invaded Judge.<lb/> | |||
<del>and the invaded Judge Judge, to the orders of<lb/> | |||
the invaded Judge belongs provisionally the preference <add><gap/></add></del></p> | |||
<p>Art. 12. Jurisdiction-adjustive function. To this function<lb/> | |||
exercise is given, by an <del><gap/></del> imperative order declaring, <del><gap/></del> <add>on Appeal from <del><gap/></del></add><lb/> | |||
<del>of the two conflicting orders, <add>to which of them</add> execution shall be given. On <gap/><gap/><gap/></del></p> | |||
<p><del>Art. <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/> | |||
To this function in that case <gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/> made by a party against the order of the invaded<lb/> | |||
<gap/></del> either of the <unclear>thus</unclear> <del><add><gap/></add></del> conflicting orders, to which of them execution shall be<lb/> | |||
<del>Jud<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> invading Judge<lb/> | |||
<gap/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/><gap/><gap/>, cognizance will be to <gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/> | |||
given belongs to the Judge Appellate. If both, if <gap/><gap/><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<add>definitively</add> given. <del>If the</del> This function, if the<lb/> | |||
territories are situated <add>both</add> <del><add><gap/></add></del> within the same District <del><gap/> <add><gap/></add> <add><gap/></add></del><lb/> | |||
belongs <del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>to the Judge Appellate;</add> if in different districts, to the<lb/> | |||
Justice Minister.</p> | |||
<p>Art. 13. <del>To him to whose</del> <add>In</add> the exercise of this <del>function</del> <add>jurisdiction-</add><lb/> | |||
<add>adjustive function <del><gap/><gap/></del></add> <del>it will be the <gap/> of</del> the Judge will <del>have</del> <add>take</add> care, lest <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
on the one part <del>through <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>invasion be unduly declined or</add> or unduly<lb/> | |||
<del>practised</del> <add>performed</add>, or on other part unduly acquiesced in or<lb/> | |||
opposed: as also lest, by collusion <del>of</del> on one or both<lb/> | |||
parts priority <del>as between</del> of execution, <del><gap/></del> in favour of <del><gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
or both; <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></del> <add>a party on <del>the</del> either side,</add> be unduly obtained.</p> | |||
<p>Art. 14. <add>Provisional <del>when</del></add> <add>only</add> <add>is the <del>preference</del></add> <add>prevalence</add> <add>here spoken of.</add> <del>As</del> Between counterdemandants, <add><unclear>whether</unclear></add> in the same<lb/> | |||
judicial <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>or</add> in different judicial <gap/>,<lb/> | |||
for the arrangements made for <add>ultimate</add> equality or proportionality<lb/> | |||
of distribution, as of <del><add><gap/></add> <gap/><gap/></del> burthens <add>so of benefits</add> see the Penal<lb/> | |||
and <add>the</add> <del><gap/></del> Non-penal, more especially the Non-penal Code.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1824. April 2 +
Constitutional Code Copd
ulto
Ch. XI. Judiciary collectively
§. Intercommunity of
service
5
Art. 10. Of As between
the execution of which place, of the the execution of the other would
if at the same point of time would be is impossible this
Art. 10. As between two such conflicting orders, the prevalence
preference belongs
belongs in the first instance to that one to
which execution was is first begun to be given.
Art. 12 11 In But, in case of disagreement, between the invading the prevalence
belongs provisionally to the orders of the invaded Judge.
and the invaded Judge Judge, to the orders of
the invaded Judge belongs provisionally the preference
Art. 12. Jurisdiction-adjustive function. To this function
exercise is given, by an imperative order declaring, on Appeal from
of the two conflicting orders, to which of them execution shall be given. On
Art.
To this function in that case
made by a party against the order of the invaded
either of the thus conflicting orders, to which of them execution shall be
Jud invading Judge
, cognizance will be to
given belongs to the Judge Appellate. If both, if
definitively given. If the This function, if the
territories are situated both within the same District
belongs to the Judge Appellate; if in different districts, to the
Justice Minister.
Art. 13. To him to whose In the exercise of this function jurisdiction-
adjustive function it will be the of the Judge will have take care, lest
on the one part through invasion be unduly declined or or unduly
practised performed, or on other part unduly acquiesced in or
opposed: as also lest, by collusion of on one or both
parts priority as between of execution, in favour of
or both; a party on the either side, be unduly obtained.
Art. 14. Provisional when only is the preference prevalence here spoken of. As Between counterdemandants, whether in the same
judicial or in different judicial ,
for the arrangements made for ultimate equality or proportionality
of distribution, as of burthens so of benefits see the Penal
and the Non-penal, more especially the Non-penal Code.
Identifier: | JB/042/279/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-04-02 |
10-13 |
||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
279 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e5 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
"copd" |
13202 |
||