JB/042/288/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/288/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1831 July 10<lb/>
Constitutional Code ++</head>
 
<note>Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
&sect;.6. Fields of Service<lb/>
or<lb/>
&sect;.7. Intercommunity of<lb/>
Jurisdictions</note>
 
<p>11</p>
 
<p>In a case of <add>a conflict of</add> this <del>sort</del> sort, it may happen for example,<lb/>
that a person having been brought before the Judge of a <del><gap/></del> <add>certain</add><lb/>
Judicatory in virtue of a mandate by him issued, in the course<lb/>
and for the purpose of a suit which <del>origin</del> had taken its origin<lb/>
in his Judicatory, a claim may be laid to the examination of<lb/>
him, or even the <unclear>extraduction</unclear> of him, by a suitor, in a suit<lb/>
which had originated in a distant Judicatory, that claim<lb/>
having for its ground a <del>man</del> correspondent mandate, issued<lb/>
by the Judge of that same distant Judicatory. In this<lb/>
case it may be necessary that the Judge, <add>by and</add> before whom this person<lb/>
is so under examination as aforesaid, should for the purpose<lb/>
of deciding to which of the <del><gap/></del> <add>two</add> claims the preference is shewn, take cognizance,<lb/>
at the same time, of the two different suits; &#x2014; namely, that<lb/>
which originated with himself, and that which had originated<lb/>
with the abovementioned distant Judge.</p>
 
<p>Here then <del><gap/></del> may be seen a demand for <del>divers</del> <add>divers</add> regulation<lb/>
of procedure, <add>neither</add> the time <add>nor even the <unclear>purport</unclear></add> of which belongs <del>and</del> to the <del>present</del> <add>present</add><lb/>
purpose, but of which for explanation of which <del><add>that which</add></del> <hi rend="underline">does</hi> belong to it,<lb/>
<del>the purpose,</del> it seemed necessary that this general indication<lb/>
should be made.</p>
 
<p>End of the Section.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1831 July 10
Constitutional Code ++

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.6. Fields of Service
or
§.7. Intercommunity of
Jurisdictions

11

In a case of a conflict of this sort sort, it may happen for example,
that a person having been brought before the Judge of a certain
Judicatory in virtue of a mandate by him issued, in the course
and for the purpose of a suit which origin had taken its origin
in his Judicatory, a claim may be laid to the examination of
him, or even the extraduction of him, by a suitor, in a suit
which had originated in a distant Judicatory, that claim
having for its ground a man correspondent mandate, issued
by the Judge of that same distant Judicatory. In this
case it may be necessary that the Judge, by and before whom this person
is so under examination as aforesaid, should for the purpose
of deciding to which of the two claims the preference is shewn, take cognizance,
at the same time, of the two different suits; — namely, that
which originated with himself, and that which had originated
with the abovementioned distant Judge.

Here then may be seen a demand for divers divers regulation
of procedure, neither the time nor even the purport of which belongs and to the present present
purpose, but of which for explanation of which that which does belong to it,
the purpose, it seemed necessary that this general indication
should be made.

End of the Section.




Identifier: | JB/042/288/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1831-07-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

288

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13211

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in