JB/042/367/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/367/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1823. August 21 ++++ 24<lb/>
Constitutional Code</head>
 
<note>1. Enactive<lb/>
Ch. II. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
&sect;.14. Judge a P<gap/> Proceeding</note>
 
<p>1</p>
 
<p>&sect;.14. Procedure, when Judge a Party.</p>
 
<p>Art. 1. <del>In case</del> <add>On the occasion</add> of a suit, in which the Judge <del>is a party <gap/></del> <add>has in quality</add><lb/>
<del>specially interested,</del> <add>of party or otherwise a special interest,</add> a choice must of course be made of some<lb/>
other judicatory: in this case, for minimizing delay, vexation and<lb/>
<sic>expence</sic>, as <del><gap/></del> <add>well as</add> charges of misdecision, the course <add>to be</add> taken <del>shall be</del> <add>is</add><lb/>
as follows &#x2014;</p>
 
<p>Art. 2. If the Judge <del><add><gap/></add></del>, and <del>the party</del> <add>all other</add> parties <del>on the other side</del><lb/>
can agree on the joint choice of some other Immediate Judicatory,<lb/>
so much the better: <del>such <add>namely an in</add></del> for example <del>one</del> <add>that, to</add> which <del><gap/><gap/><gap/> <add>the <gap/></add> <add>appropriate</add></del><lb/>
<add>the appropriate evidence</add> may be <del>called</del> presented <del>to the view of the Judicatory</del> with least delay, vexation<lb/>
and <sic>expence</sic>, and without <sic>encreased</sic> danger of misdecision.</p>
 
<p>Art. 3. If not, a list of the Immediate Judicatories<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">immediately contiguous</hi><hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> to that of which he is Judge being made<lb/>
out, the party <add>or parties</add> on the other side strike out one, the <del>Judge</del> <add>party or parties</add><lb/>
<add>on the side on which the Judge is,</add> another; and so on, until only one or two are left: if one<lb/>
that is the Judicatory in which the <del>case shall</del> <add>suit is to</add> be <del>decided;</del> <add>tried:</add><lb/>
if two, lot decides which it shall be.</p>
 
<p><del>Art. 4. Power to a party opposed to litigant against the Judge to</del><lb/>
Art. 4. In case of the Judge's striking out a Judicatory<lb/>
in a peculiar degree <gap/>ment as per Art. 2., power to the<lb/>
adverse party to <del>apply to</del> appeal to the Appellate Judicatory,<lb/>
praying <add>for reasons <sic>alledged</sic></add> the <del><gap/></del> appointment of <del>that Jud</del> the <add>so</add> discarded<lb/>
Judicatory notwithstanding.</p>
 
<p>Art. 5. In respect of special interest, the bias may<lb/>
be <del>the <gap/> nearly</del> <add>nearly or altogether</add> the same, whether it be in his own person<lb/>
that the Judge has the interest or in the person of some other<lb/>
individual, <del><gap/> connected with him</del> <add>with whom he is connected</add> by some special tie;<lb/>
<add>whether</add> of self-regarding or sympathetic interest: <del>as if it be <add>is</add></del> <add>for example</add> a wife<lb/>
<del><gap/> child</del>, offspring, parent or other near relation <add>in the ascending <del><gap/></del> collateral line</add> patron, <hi rend="underline">protege</hi><lb/>
or old and intimate friend.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:42, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. August 21 ++++ 24
Constitutional Code

1. Enactive
Ch. II. Judiciary collectively
§.14. Judge a P Proceeding

1

§.14. Procedure, when Judge a Party.

Art. 1. In case On the occasion of a suit, in which the Judge is a party has in quality
specially interested, of party or otherwise a special interest, a choice must of course be made of some
other judicatory: in this case, for minimizing delay, vexation and
expence, as well as charges of misdecision, the course to be taken shall be is
as follows —

Art. 2. If the Judge , and the party all other parties on the other side
can agree on the joint choice of some other Immediate Judicatory,
so much the better: such namely an in for example one that, to which the appropriate
the appropriate evidence may be called presented to the view of the Judicatory with least delay, vexation
and expence, and without encreased danger of misdecision.

Art. 3. If not, a list of the Immediate Judicatories
immediately contiguous(a) to that of which he is Judge being made
out, the party or parties on the other side strike out one, the Judge party or parties
on the side on which the Judge is, another; and so on, until only one or two are left: if one
that is the Judicatory in which the case shall suit is to be decided; tried:
if two, lot decides which it shall be.

Art. 4. Power to a party opposed to litigant against the Judge to
Art. 4. In case of the Judge's striking out a Judicatory
in a peculiar degree ment as per Art. 2., power to the
adverse party to apply to appeal to the Appellate Judicatory,
praying for reasons alledged the appointment of that Jud the so discarded
Judicatory notwithstanding.

Art. 5. In respect of special interest, the bias may
be the nearly nearly or altogether the same, whether it be in his own person
that the Judge has the interest or in the person of some other
individual, connected with him with whom he is connected by some special tie;
whether of self-regarding or sympathetic interest: as if it be is for example a wife
child, offspring, parent or other near relation in the ascending collateral line patron, protege
or old and intimate friend.




Identifier: | JB/042/367/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1823-08-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-5

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

367

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

procedure, when judge is party

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d24 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13290

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in