JB/042/435/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/435/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1824. April 17<lb/>
Constitutional Code or Procedure.</head>
 
<note>+ +<lb/>
1</note>
 
<note>Ch. <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
&sect;. <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
preinterpretion</note>
 
<p>Consultation <del><gap/></del> of a Judge by a party.</p>
 
<p>No applicant to apply<lb/>
to a second Judge without<lb/>
information of the <unclear>applicant</unclear><lb/>
to a first<lb/>
Give examples</p>
 
<p>&#9758; Connect this with Melioration suggestive function<lb/>
in the situation of Judge Immediate and Justice Minister.<lb/>
The perception of the Opinion-giving <gap/> Judge the best<lb/>
judge of what himself will do.</p>
 
<p>Art. <!-- blank --> Any person to whom for his guidance the law<lb/>
in <del>its</del> the state in which it lies before him, appears insufficient,<lb/>
whether it be that in a certain case no provision at all has<lb/>
been made by it, or that the provision made by it is either<lb/>
ambiguous or obscure, may <add>in the Judicatory</add> present himself before the Judge<lb/>
principal and request him to declare what in the supposition<lb/>
that <del>such</del> by the applicant conduct to such an effect<lb/>
were pursued, or that an event to such or such in effect<lb/>
should take place would be his decrees. In a word</p>
 
<p>To the Judge, of his own Judicatory <add>territory</add>, <del>when an</del> when a<lb/>
Code has been established, may any person make application<lb/>
for his advice, as to any matter contained in such Code,<lb/>
as <del><gap/></del> in a country in which there is no <add>has no such</add> Code <del><gap/></del> a<lb/>
man repairs to a professional lawyer for his opinion.</p>
 
<p>As to this see Constitutional Code Ch. XI, Judiciary collectively,<lb/>
&sect;, <!-- blank --> Preinterpretative function.</p>
 
<note>&#9758; This is for Procedure Code<lb/>
XI &sect;.</note>
 
<p>Art. <!-- blank --> When any such application is made, <add>the first thing</add> <add>object</add> it will<lb/>
be <add>of consideration</add> for the Judge <add>after examination made of the applicatant</add> to consider whether the information thus requested<lb/>
can be given without injury to the rights <add>interests</add> of other individuals<lb/>
or to the public interest. If it be clear to him that no such<lb/>
injury can arise, he will declare as much, and at the same<lb/>
time draw up <add>in relation to the text of the law</add> such proposed amendment <del>to the text</del> <add>by which</add> as in his view<lb/>
the imperfection may be cured <add>mended</add>. He then</p>
 
<p><del>He thereupon transmitts</del> Of the amendment <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>he delivers a</add> it<lb/>
preserves one exemplar for the use of his own judicatory; <del>he</del> a second he<lb/>
<add>delivers</add> to the applicant, <del>one exemplar; another</del> <add>a third</add> he <sic>transmitts</sic> to the Appellate<lb/>
Judicatory, a <del>third</del> <add>fourth</add> to the Justice Minister, and a <del>fourth</del> <add>fifth</add><lb/>
to the Legislation Minister.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:42, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824. April 17
Constitutional Code or Procedure.

+ +
1

Ch.
§.
preinterpretion

Consultation of a Judge by a party.

No applicant to apply
to a second Judge without
information of the applicant
to a first
Give examples

☞ Connect this with Melioration suggestive function
in the situation of Judge Immediate and Justice Minister.
The perception of the Opinion-giving Judge the best
judge of what himself will do.

Art. Any person to whom for his guidance the law
in its the state in which it lies before him, appears insufficient,
whether it be that in a certain case no provision at all has
been made by it, or that the provision made by it is either
ambiguous or obscure, may in the Judicatory present himself before the Judge
principal and request him to declare what in the supposition
that such by the applicant conduct to such an effect
were pursued, or that an event to such or such in effect
should take place would be his decrees. In a word

To the Judge, of his own Judicatory territory, when an when a
Code has been established, may any person make application
for his advice, as to any matter contained in such Code,
as in a country in which there is no has no such Code a
man repairs to a professional lawyer for his opinion.

As to this see Constitutional Code Ch. XI, Judiciary collectively,
§, Preinterpretative function.

☞ This is for Procedure Code
XI §.

Art. When any such application is made, the first thing object it will
be of consideration for the Judge after examination made of the applicatant to consider whether the information thus requested
can be given without injury to the rights interests of other individuals
or to the public interest. If it be clear to him that no such
injury can arise, he will declare as much, and at the same
time draw up in relation to the text of the law such proposed amendment to the text by which as in his view
the imperfection may be cured mended. He then

He thereupon transmitts Of the amendment he delivers a it
preserves one exemplar for the use of his own judicatory; he a second he
delivers to the applicant, one exemplar; another a third he transmitts to the Appellate
Judicatory, a third fourth to the Justice Minister, and a fourth fifth
to the Legislation Minister.




Identifier: | JB/042/435/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-04-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code; procedure code

Folio number

435

Info in main headings field

constitutional code or procedure

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

13358

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in