JB/121/109/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/109/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/121/109/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/109/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/109/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p><!-- pencil -->2 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1802<lb/>
<!-- heading in pencil --> <head>2 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1802</head> <p><note>2<hi rend="superscript">nd</hi><lb/>To <sic>L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></sic> Pelham</note></p> <!-- note in pencil --> <p> <note>Addington's<lb/>silence unjustifiable</note></p> <p>In the <add>The</add> treatment bestowed upon this letter the <add>will</add><lb/>public possess <add>enable the public to <sic>appretiate</sic></add> a <del>sample</del> touchstone <add>test</add> which will <add>by which they may</add><lb/><del>The treatment</del> enable them <add>are enabled</add> to <sic>appretiate</sic> the character <add>title</add> of your<lb/>Right Honourable colleague on the score <add>to the values/several scores</add> of urbanity,<lb/>
<head>To L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Pelham</head></p>
magnanimity, probity, <add>humanity integrity</add> and justice &#x2014;<lb/>his <add>love of</add> justice by <del>then</del> turning a deaf ear to evidence<lb/>&#x2014; an evidence <add>strictly</add> competent <del>and above<lb/>all <gap/></del> superior to all exception and the<lb/>same when he himself is in the habit of<lb/>giving the fullest credit to on all other grounds,<lb/><del><gap/></del> integrity, by entering into the confederacy <add><hi rend="underline">bestowing</hi> with exclusive<lb/>deference and obsequiousness to the secret<lb/>representatives</add> with the persons accused &#x2014; persons of<lb/><add>whose<lb/>conduct suspicion had been stamped in conspicuous</add><lb/>whose guilt <del>the circumstance</del> stood apparent<lb/><add>colours by</add> upon the face of the <del><gap/></del> Report of the Committee<lb/>of Finance and <del>was sufficiently <gap/> of whatever</del> <add>of whose delinquency in</add><lb/><del>the more interval whose</del> contempt of the<lb/>law obtained at their own <sic>sollicitation,</sic> <del>stood de</del><lb/>the very lapse of time was a sufficient proof<lb/>was a proof sufficient of itself to impose on<lb/>him the lash of investigation – his humanity<lb/>for <del>beli</del> beholding with confecting apathy <add>negligence</add> the<lb/>unmerited afflictions of an injured individual<lb/>for <del>turning <gap/></del> <add>exasperation adding</add> with unfeeling apathy <del>from<lb/>see the</del> to a course of suffering <add>sense of of affliction</add> as notorious<lb/>as it has been unmerited &#x2014; his magnanimity<hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> by <unclear>evading</unclear> to grant that which fear <add>and</add> shame and fear forbad him to refuse,</note><lb/>by not daring to reject <del>an application</del> <add>put a negative or<lb/>censure</add> as improper an application on which nothing<lb/>but the impropriety of it could justify him<lb/>in bestowing such treatment;  his urbanity, in treating<lb/>with contemptuous silence the respectful<lb/>address of a person whom he could not so<lb/><add>much</add> <!-- continues in the margin --><lb/>much as pretend<lb/>to consider as unworthy<lb/>of an answer<lb/>in such a<lb/>case, having <del>at</del><lb/>on a former occasion<lb/>given him an<lb/>answer even <add>though</add> where<lb/>no such duty called<lb/>for it.</p>
<p>In the <add>The</add> treatment bestowed upon this letter the <add>will</add><lb/>
public possess a <add>enable the public to appretiate</add> <del>sample</del> touchstone which will <add>test by which they may<lb/>
are enabled</add> enable them to appretiate the character <add><unclear>title</unclear></add> of your<lb/>
<add><del>the treatment</del></add> Right Honourable colleague on the score <add>to the values several scores</add> of urbanity,<lb/>
magnanimity, probity, <add>humanity integrity</add> and justice <lb/>
his <add>ove of</add> justice by <del>them</del> turning a deaf ear to evidence<lb/>
an evidence <add>strictly</add> competent <del>and above<lb/>
all <gap/></del> superior to all exception and the<lb/>
same when he himself is in the habit of<lb/>
giving the fullest credit to on all other grounds,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> integrity, by entering into the confederacy <add>bestowing with exclusive<lb/>
deference and obsequiousness to the <gap/> whose<lb/>
representatives</add> with the persons accused persons of<lb/>
<add>conduct suspicion had been stamped in conspicuous<lb/>
<gap/>, by</add> whose guilt <del>the circumstance</del> stood apparent<lb/>
upon the face of the <del><gap/></del> Report of the Committee<lb/>
of Finance and <del>was sufficiently <gap/> of which</del> <add>of whose delinquency in</add><lb/>
<del>was the more interval whose</del> contempt of the<lb/>
law obtained at their own <gap/>, <del>stood de</del><lb/>
the very lapse of time was a sufficient proof<lb/>
was a proof sufficient of itself to impose on<lb/>
him the <unclear>taste</unclear> of investigation – his humanity<lb/>
for <del>beli</del> beholding with conflicting apathy <add>negligence</add> the<lb/>
<gap/> afflictions of an injured individual<lb/>
for <del>turning <gap/></del> <add>exasperation adding</add> with unfeeling apathy <del>from<lb/>
see the</del> to a course of suffering <add><unclear>scene</unclear> of affliction</add> as notorious<lb/>
as it has been <gap/> – his magnanimity<hi rend="superscript"></hi> <note><hi rend="superscript"></hi> by <gap/> to grant that which fear <add>and</add> shame and fear forbid him to refuse,</note> <lb/>
by not daring to reject <del>an application</del> <add>put a negative or<lb/>
censure</add> an improper an application on which nothing<lb/>
but the impropriety of it could justify him<lb/>
in bestowing such treatment;  his urbanity, intreating<lb/>
with contemptuous silence the respectful<lb/>
address of a person whom he could not<lb/>
much as pretend<lb/>
to consider as unworthy<lb/>
of an answer<lb/>
in such a<lb/>
case, having <del>at</del><lb/>
on a former occasion<lb/>
given him an<lb/>
answer even <add>though</add> when<lb/>
no such duty called<lb/>
for it.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:44, 20 October 2023

'Click Here To Edit

2 Jany 1802

2nd
To Ld Pelham

Addington's
silence unjustifiable

In the The treatment bestowed upon this letter the will
public possess enable the public to appretiate a sample touchstone test which will by which they may
The treatment enable them are enabled to appretiate the character title of your
Right Honourable colleague on the score to the values/several scores of urbanity,
magnanimity, probity, humanity integrity and justice —
his love of justice by then turning a deaf ear to evidence
— an evidence strictly competent and above
all
superior to all exception and the
same when he himself is in the habit of
giving the fullest credit to on all other grounds,
integrity, by entering into the confederacy bestowing with exclusive
deference and obsequiousness to the secret
representatives
with the persons accused — persons of
whose
conduct suspicion had been stamped in conspicuous

whose guilt the circumstance stood apparent
colours by upon the face of the Report of the Committee
of Finance and was sufficiently of whatever of whose delinquency in
the more interval whose contempt of the
law obtained at their own sollicitation, stood de
the very lapse of time was a sufficient proof
was a proof sufficient of itself to impose on
him the lash of investigation – his humanity
for beli beholding with confecting apathy negligence the
unmerited afflictions of an injured individual
for turning exasperation adding with unfeeling apathy from
see the
to a course of suffering sense of of affliction as notorious
as it has been unmerited — his magnanimity[+] [+] by evading to grant that which fear and shame and fear forbad him to refuse,
by not daring to reject an application put a negative or
censure
as improper an application on which nothing
but the impropriety of it could justify him
in bestowing such treatment; his urbanity, in treating
with contemptuous silence the respectful
address of a person whom he could not so
much
much as pretend
to consider as unworthy
of an answer
in such a
case, having at
on a former occasion
given him an
answer even though where
no such duty called
for it.


Identifier: | JB/121/109/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-01-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

109

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in