★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<head>8 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1802 M 6<lb/><del>L</del> Insidious Letter</head> <p><note>24 <sic>Mar.</sic> 1801</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>J.B. gave no<lb/>answer.<lb/>Reasons for his<lb/>return.</note></p> <p>Such being the letter Your Lordship may<lb/>begin to feel some curiosity <add>feel a curiosity perhaps</add> to learn the<lb/>answer made to it. My Lord I made<lb/>no answer to it: and after a moment or two<lb/>of reflection, Your Lordship will not be <add>much</add> surprized.</p> <p><note>1. The Letter writers<lb/>&c were all<lb/>out of office.</note></p><p>In the first place, who was there to answer?<lb/>to whom was the <add>any</add> answer to be addressed —<lb/>not in form I mean — but in substance.<lb/>The contriver — the writer of the letter — the<lb/>only individual perhaps who knew any<lb/>thing of the contents of the letter except<lb/>the Clerk who copied it — or remembered what<lb/>little might have been remembered by any body<lb/>of the transactions that had preceded it — <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic><lb/>Long <add>in a word</add> are gone. <del>M</del> One Secretary <add><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Long</add> gave the<lb/>other Secretary from the Chief Member <add>Lord</add> Chamber gave:<lb/>the <gap/> Members <add>Lords</add> gave — one or two <del>excepted</del><lb/>of their Lordships — whose information <add>knowledge</add> about the<lb/>business, when <del>out of civility</del> <add>in curtesy</add> it was now and<lb/>then asked for, used to be <del>drawn</del> <add>inquired about</add> from me. <!-- pencil note in margin -->[+]<lb/><note>[+] and who Long<lb/>had taken care,<lb/>should I never<lb/>know any thing<lb/>about its matter.<lb/>He has suppressed<lb/>the Minutes that<lb/>were to reference this.</note></p> <p><del>But why I made <add>gave</add> no answer to it will be<lb/>more fully seen after <add><unclear>for</unclear></add> Your Lordship has read<lb/>the Minutes.</del></p> <p>In the next place, to what end should I<lb/>have answered it? A question this, the answer<lb/>to which will be the more fully understood, in <add>from</add> a<lb/>succeeding section, after <add>when</add> Your Lordship has read the<lb/>Minutes.</p> | <head>8 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 1802 M 6<lb/><del>L</del> Insidious Letter</head> <p><note>24 <sic>Mar.</sic> 1801</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>J.B. gave no<lb/>answer.<lb/>Reasons for his<lb/>return.</note></p> <p>Such being the letter Your Lordship may<lb/>begin to feel some curiosity <add>feel a curiosity perhaps</add> to learn the<lb/>answer made to it. My Lord I made<lb/>no answer to it: and after a moment or two<lb/>of reflection, Your Lordship will not be <add>much</add> surprized.</p> <p><note>1. The Letter writers<lb/>&c were all<lb/>out of office.</note></p><p>In the first place, who was there to answer?<lb/>to whom was the <add>any</add> answer to be addressed —<lb/>not in form I mean — but in substance.<lb/>The contriver — the writer of the letter — the<lb/>only individual perhaps who knew any<lb/>thing of the contents of the letter except<lb/>the Clerk who copied it — or remembered what<lb/>little might have been remembered by any body<lb/>of the transactions that had preceded it — <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic><lb/>Long <add>in a word</add> are gone. <del>M</del> One Secretary <add><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Long</add> gave the<lb/>other Secretary from the Chief Member <add>Lord</add> Chamber gave:<lb/>the <gap/> Members <add>Lords</add> gave — one or two <del>excepted</del><lb/>of their Lordships — whose information <add>knowledge</add> about the<lb/>business, when <del>out of civility</del> <add>in curtesy</add> it was now and<lb/>then asked for, used to be <del>drawn</del> <add>inquired about</add> from me. <!-- pencil note in margin -->[+]<lb/><note>[+] and who Long<lb/>had taken care,<lb/>should I never<lb/>know any thing<lb/>about its matter.<lb/>He has suppressed<lb/>the Minutes that<lb/>were to reference this.</note></p> <p><del>But why I made <add>gave</add> no answer to it will be<lb/>more fully seen after <add><unclear>for</unclear></add> Your Lordship has read<lb/>the Minutes.</del></p> <p>In the next place, to what end should I<lb/>have answered it? A question this, the answer<lb/>to which will be the more fully understood, in <add>from</add> a<lb/>succeeding section, after <add>when</add> Your Lordship has read the<lb/>Minutes.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
8 Jany 1802 M 6
L Insidious Letter
24 Mar. 1801
6
J.B. gave no
answer.
Reasons for his
return.
Such being the letter Your Lordship may
begin to feel some curiosity feel a curiosity perhaps to learn the
answer made to it. My Lord I made
no answer to it: and after a moment or two
of reflection, Your Lordship will not be much surprized.
1. The Letter writers
&c were all
out of office.
In the first place, who was there to answer?
to whom was the any answer to be addressed —
not in form I mean — but in substance.
The contriver — the writer of the letter — the
only individual perhaps who knew any
thing of the contents of the letter except
the Clerk who copied it — or remembered what
little might have been remembered by any body
of the transactions that had preceded it — Mr
Long in a word are gone. M One Secretary Mr Long gave the
other Secretary from the Chief Member Lord Chamber gave:
the Members Lords gave — one or two excepted
of their Lordships — whose information knowledge about the
business, when out of civility in curtesy it was now and
then asked for, used to be drawn inquired about from me. [+]
[+] and who Long
had taken care,
should I never
know any thing
about its matter.
He has suppressed
the Minutes that
were to reference this.
But why I made gave no answer to it will be
more fully seen after for Your Lordship has read
the Minutes.
In the next place, to what end should I
have answered it? A question this, the answer
to which will be the more fully understood, in from a
succeeding section, after when Your Lordship has read the
Minutes.
|
Identifier: | JB/121/177/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-01-08 |
6 |
||
|
121 |
Panopticon |
||
|
177 |
Insidious Letter |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D6 |
||
|
001 |
|||
