★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/213/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '[{{fullurl:JB/121/213/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- heading and marginal summary in pencil. All text apart from the final paragraph bracketed in pencil in the right hand margin --> <head>20 <sic>Mar</sic> 1802 O<lb/>§ Grounds After 5 Conclusion<lb/>Superseded</head> <p><note>Consciousness of the<lb/>Frivolousness of<lb/>these last arguments<lb/>proved by their<lb/>being ranked behind<lb/>the argument from<lb/>delay</note></p> <p>It is not that these arguments are <add>merely</add> frivolous in themselves<lb/>— frivolous in the extreme to every impartial eye<lb/>that looks at them: they were frivolous — and as frivolous<lb/>as it is possible for arguments to be — in the eyes<lb/>of the very persons <del>by whom</del> who thus make use of<lb/>them. Can ever this be a matter of doubt — if<lb/>the fact were susceptible <add>exposed</add> of doubt — if their own notorious<lb/>frivolousness was not a sufficient proof of the appearance<lb/>they can not but <unclear>wear</unclear> to <add>in</add> every eye without exception —<lb/>that looks at them: the very circumstance of the<lb/>company in which they <del><gap/></del> are found — and the rank <add>coupled with that of</add><lb/>in which they are placed would <add>of itself</add> be abundantly sufficient.<lb/>The leading argument — the argument placed<lb/>in the front of the battle is the argument from the delay<lb/>— the argument by which the <add><gap/></add> length of a course<lb/>of injury <add>male practice/criminality</add> is brought <add>adduced</add> by way of justification of the consummation<lb/>of it: the more flagrant <add><gap/></add> their own wrong, the<lb/>stronger their plea for being allowed to take advantage of<lb/>it, for being suffered to reap the full advantage of<lb/>it.</p> <!-- final paragraph crossed through in pencil --><p>I have tortured you so long, that now I have a<lb/>right to kill you, <add>put you to death</add>, murder you. In point of morality<lb/>there is a difference between the two cases <add>the cases are different</add>: but in point <add>the logic</add><lb/> of logic, they are the same.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
20 Mar 1802 O
§ Grounds After 5 Conclusion
Superseded
Consciousness of the
Frivolousness of
these last arguments
proved by their
being ranked behind
the argument from
delay
It is not that these arguments are merely frivolous in themselves
— frivolous in the extreme to every impartial eye
that looks at them: they were frivolous — and as frivolous
as it is possible for arguments to be — in the eyes
of the very persons by whom who thus make use of
them. Can ever this be a matter of doubt — if
the fact were susceptible exposed of doubt — if their own notorious
frivolousness was not a sufficient proof of the appearance
they can not but wear to in every eye without exception —
that looks at them: the very circumstance of the
company in which they are found — and the rank coupled with that of
in which they are placed would of itself be abundantly sufficient.
The leading argument — the argument placed
in the front of the battle is the argument from the delay
— the argument by which the length of a course
of injury male practice/criminality is brought adduced by way of justification of the consummation
of it: the more flagrant their own wrong, the
stronger their plea for being allowed to take advantage of
it, for being suffered to reap the full advantage of
it.
I have tortured you so long, that now I have a
right to kill you, put you to death, murder you. In point of morality
there is a difference between the two cases the cases are different: but in point the logic
of logic, they are the same.
Identifier: | JB/121/213/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-03-21 |
Not numbered |
||
121 |
Panopticon |
||
213 |
Conclusion |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
|||
1800 |
|||
1800 |
|||
[[notes_public::Superseded [note in Bentham's hand]]] |
001 |
||