JB/121/238/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/238/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->10 Apr. 1802<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>3.  Jail Imprisonments</head></p>
 
<p>Can imagination frame a case, in which the tendency<lb/>
 
<add>thus</add> attributed to the Penitentiary establishment would be realized?</p>
 
<p>A <del><gap/></del> good model <add>example good in all <del>its</del> points</add> has its use:  those who<lb/>
think it so will be disposed to copy it in all points.</p>
<p>A <del>bad</del> model bad in all points has its use,<lb/>
those who think it such will be disposed to copy<lb/>
it in all points.</p>
<p>A model good in some points bad in others<lb/>
has its use:  in such as <del>a man the</del> appear good<lb/>
a man will be disposed to copy it:  in such as appear<lb/>
bad, to avoid copying it.</p>
<p>A Penitentiary House is after all but a species<lb/>
of Gaol.  If <del>in the</del> the Penitentiary House, having<lb/>
or not having improvements in it would check <add><del>stop</del> the spirit of</add> improvements<lb/>
in the Gaols, so would any other Gaol<lb/>
improved or attempted to be improved.  Such improved<lb/>
or attempted to be improved Gaol would in respect<lb/>
of improvement be either above or below or upon<lb/>
a level with any as yet unimproved Gaol:  in any<lb/>
one of the three cases it would have an equal tendency<lb/>
to prevent the improvement of it, as the Penitentiary<lb/>
House would.  This argument deduced from the Dukes<lb/>
portended desire of <del>introd</del> seeing improvement introduced into<lb/>
all Gaols is therefore in effect an argument – and if it were<lb/>
good for anything in the case of the Penitentiary House a <del><gap/></del><lb/>
presumption and unanswerable one – against the introducing<lb/>
improvement into<lb/>
any one.  The<lb/>
reasoning in the <add>favour of the letter</add><lb/>
<gap/> <del>cannot be</del> <add>illegal measure</add> in repugnance<lb/>
to the portended<lb/>
object of it.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:44, 20 October 2023

'Click Here To Edit

10 Apr. 1802
3. Jail Imprisonments

Can imagination frame a case, in which the tendency
thus attributed to the Penitentiary establishment would be realized?

A good model example good in all its points has its use: those who
think it so will be disposed to copy it in all points.

A bad model bad in all points has its use,
those who think it such will be disposed to copy
it in all points.

A model good in some points bad in others
has its use: in such as a man the appear good
a man will be disposed to copy it: in such as appear
bad, to avoid copying it.

A Penitentiary House is after all but a species
of Gaol. If in the the Penitentiary House, having
or not having improvements in it would check stop the spirit of improvements
in the Gaols, so would any other Gaol
improved or attempted to be improved. Such improved
or attempted to be improved Gaol would in respect
of improvement be either above or below or upon
a level with any as yet unimproved Gaol: in any
one of the three cases it would have an equal tendency
to prevent the improvement of it, as the Penitentiary
House would. This argument deduced from the Dukes
portended desire of introd seeing improvement introduced into
all Gaols is therefore in effect an argument – and if it were
good for anything in the case of the Penitentiary House a
presumption and unanswerable one – against the introducing
improvement into
any one. The
reasoning in the favour of the letter
cannot be illegal measure in repugnance
to the portended
object of it.


Identifier: | JB/121/238/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

238

Info in main headings field

3 Jail Improvements

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in