JB/121/275/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/275/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/275/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/275/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->20 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1802</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>My Lord, what ruined them (I mean with<lb/>
 
Your Lordship if not with the world in point of<lb/>
 
character – as much as they <add>themselves</add> have ruined me<lb/>
 
in other points, is this –  For four years<lb/>
and more before the commencement of this period<lb/>
they had been speculators of my patience.  They<lb/>
had even made <add>witnessed</add> an experiment made upon<lb/>
the patience of the public – and no harm had<lb/>
happened to them.  I had painted them to<lb/>
the life:  the picture had even been hung<lb/>
up and framed by the Committee of Finance.<lb/>
There was perfidy – there was laziness – there<lb/>
was incapacity – there was every thing that<lb/>
could degrade a set of men in every eye<lb/>
that chose to look that way:  But no<lb/>
eye, as they found, <hi rend="underline">had</hi> chosen <add>been in a <unclear>burnover</unclear></add> – had found<lb/>
it convenient to look that way.  Not <add>None</add> within<lb/>
<unclear>doers</unclear> – for this and that, and I don't<lb/>
know many thousand reasons.  Not without<lb/>
<unclear>doers</unclear> – why? – because the picture had<lb/>
no names to it.  As for <add>blame</add> shame and scandal<lb/>
indeed – of that there was no want.  As little<lb/>
in general is there any want of despotism in<lb/>
the public eye to fix upon it, so long as <add>John or Thomas</add>  individual<lb/>
can be found to fasten it upon.  But in<lb/>
<del>this</del> <add><hi rend="underline">that</hi></add> picture of mine – and I am sure I<lb/>
need say to Your Lordship why) there was not<lb/>
<del>such</del> <add>one</add> individual there was not a single name to<lb/>
<add>any</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:44, 20 October 2023

'Click Here To Edit

20 Jany 1802

My Lord, what ruined them (I mean with
Your Lordship if not with the world in point of
character – as much as they themselves have ruined me
in other points, is this – For four years
and more before the commencement of this period
they had been speculators of my patience. They
had even made witnessed an experiment made upon
the patience of the public – and no harm had
happened to them. I had painted them to
the life: the picture had even been hung
up and framed by the Committee of Finance.
There was perfidy – there was laziness – there
was incapacity – there was every thing that
could degrade a set of men in every eye
that chose to look that way: But no
eye, as they found, had chosen been in a burnover – had found
it convenient to look that way. Not None within
doers – for this and that, and I don't
know many thousand reasons. Not without
doers – why? – because the picture had
no names to it. As for blame shame and scandal
indeed – of that there was no want. As little
in general is there any want of despotism in
the public eye to fix upon it, so long as John or Thomas individual
can be found to fasten it upon. But in
this that picture of mine – and I am sure I
need say to Your Lordship why) there was not
such one individual there was not a single name to
any


Identifier: | JB/121/275/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-01-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

22

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

275

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C3 / E13

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::Postpone [note in Bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in