JB/121/312/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/312/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/312/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/312/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->19 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 1802</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>This <del>abuse</del> <add>constant impossibility</add> of explanation – this persevering<lb/>
 
ad uninterrupted refusal or <unclear>want</unclear> of <del>all the</del> <add>so</add><lb/>
 
<del>explanation</del> <add><del>necessary means of progress</del> indispensable <del><gap/></del> a requisite to the fulfillment of the engagement entered into –</add> is a point of no small importance:<lb/>
 
– of importance, not merely as<lb/>
servicing in such <add>so high</add> a degree to swell the account<lb/>
of <add>continuity and</add> injury – but as forming so irrefragable <add>conclusive</add><lb/>
a proof of constant <hi rend="underline">mala fides</hi>, and as<lb/>
<del>operating as a <unclear>confessist</unclear> of</del> <add>amounting to a <del>fath</del> plea of guilty to <del><gap/> of the repeated</del></add> the charges which<lb/>
your Lordship will find <add>so repeatedly</add> made by me, <del>upon</del> <add>against</add><lb/>
<del>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long from time to time, by <gap/></del> <add>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long himself, I mean by necessary</add> implication,<lb/>
though without any trace of imputation,<lb/>
and in <del>no exceptionable</del> language so unexeceptionable,<lb/>
as to have necessitated a repeated confession on his part, that it had<lb/>
never afforded him<lb/>
any thing neither that<lb/>
nor any other part of<lb/>
my deportment had<lb/>
ever afforded him<lb/>
any thing to complain<lb/>
of.</p>
<p><del>You will find me over and over again<lb/>
putting him to <gap/> on which <add>the want of</add> his reputation<lb/>
as a man of honour <gap/> was at risk</del></p>
<p>Yes, my Lord – you will find me charging<lb/>
him with facts upon facts, <del>such</del> <add>any one</add> of which<lb/>
unless explained would have been sufficient to<lb/>
fix upon <del>this</del> <add>the human a mans</add> character an indelible stain of<lb/>
perfidy – and still you will find him suffering<lb/>
judgment to go by default – unable to<lb/>
endure the test of explanation – and, with<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>even undissembled</add> terror, shrinking from it to the<lb/>
very last.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:44, 20 October 2023

'Click Here To Edit

19 Jany. 1802

This abuse constant impossibility of explanation – this persevering
ad uninterrupted refusal or want of all the so
explanation necessary means of progress indispensable a requisite to the fulfillment of the engagement entered into – is a point of no small importance:
– of importance, not merely as
servicing in such so high a degree to swell the account
of continuity and injury – but as forming so irrefragable conclusive
a proof of constant mala fides, and as
operating as a confessist of amounting to a fath plea of guilty to of the repeated the charges which
your Lordship will find so repeatedly made by me, upon against
Mr Long from time to time, by Mr to Mr Long himself, I mean by necessary implication,
though without any trace of imputation,
and in no exceptionable language so unexeceptionable,
as to have necessitated a repeated confession on his part, that it had
never afforded him
any thing neither that
nor any other part of
my deportment had
ever afforded him
any thing to complain
of.

You will find me over and over again
putting him to on which the want of his reputation
as a man of honour was at risk

Yes, my Lord – you will find me charging
him with facts upon facts, such any one of which
unless explained would have been sufficient to
fix upon this the human a mans character an indelible stain of
perfidy – and still you will find him suffering
judgment to go by default – unable to
endure the test of explanation – and, with
even undissembled terror, shrinking from it to the
very last.


Identifier: | JB/121/312/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-01-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

312

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in