JB/121/366/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/366/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/121/366/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
<p>Compare my Lord the enterprize of the Duke of<lb/>
<p>Compare my Lord the enterprize of the Duke of<lb/>
Portland, as manifested by this letter to the enterprize<lb/>
Portland, as manifested by this letter to the enterprize<lb/>
of Charles the first in the case of Ship-money.  I<lb/>
of Charles the first in the case of Ship-money.  It<lb/>
 
was in that case the decision <add>opinion</add> of the Kings Judges <add>Court</add> was<lb/>
</p>
in that case that the King might <unclear>levy</unclear> money without<lb/>
 
Parliament in case of danger <add>sufficiently urgent need</add> – and that he was judge<lb/>
 
of the danger and whether there was danger <add>need</add> or no was for<lb/>
 
the King to judge.</p>
<p>The declared opinion, declared on this occasion by the<lb/>
Duke is that it belongs to him <unclear>to</unclear> rescind one Act<lb/>
of Parliament if it be an improper one:  and that<lb/>
whether it be an improper one or no was for him to<lb/>
judge:  he finds it an improper one, and he <del>will</del> <add>deals by it</add> accordingly.</p>
<p>Another opinion declared on this same occasion by<lb/>
the Duke is that it belongs to him to tie up the<lb/>
hands of the Judges if there be danger <add>probability</add> of their acting<lb/>
improperly <add>"<hi rend="underline">inexpediently</hi>"</add> and that it belongs to him to judge<lb/>
whether there be any such:  whether such danger <add>probability</add> exists: –<lb/>
he finds that such danger does exist and he acts <add>deals<lb/>
by them</add> accordingly.</p>
<p>To assume legislative power is not sufficient to<lb/>
satisfy the ambition of the Duke:  to make up the deficiency<lb/>
he adds a lot of power if the nature of judicial<lb/>
power, but above <add>superior to</add> it – not extra-judicial power<lb/>
that is not high enough – but supra-judicial power:<lb/>
<del>new things require new <gap/></del> for the language itself<lb/>
halts in its endeavours to reach the <add>undisguised</add> ambition of this Duke.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2023

'Click Here To Edit

1 Apr 1802
Dispensing power
Inessentialia?

Compare my Lord the enterprize of the Duke of
Portland, as manifested by this letter to the enterprize
of Charles the first in the case of Ship-money. It
was in that case the decision opinion of the Kings Judges Court was
in that case that the King might levy money without
Parliament in case of danger sufficiently urgent need – and that he was judge
of the danger and whether there was danger need or no was for
the King to judge.

The declared opinion, declared on this occasion by the
Duke is that it belongs to him to rescind one Act
of Parliament if it be an improper one: and that
whether it be an improper one or no was for him to
judge: he finds it an improper one, and he will deals by it accordingly.

Another opinion declared on this same occasion by
the Duke is that it belongs to him to tie up the
hands of the Judges if there be danger probability of their acting
improperly "inexpediently" and that it belongs to him to judge
whether there be any such: whether such danger probability exists: –
he finds that such danger does exist and he acts deals
by them
accordingly.

To assume legislative power is not sufficient to
satisfy the ambition of the Duke: to make up the deficiency
he adds a lot of power if the nature of judicial
power, but above superior to it – not extra-judicial power
that is not high enough – but supra-judicial power:
new things require new for the language itself
halts in its endeavours to reach the undisguised ambition of this Duke.


Identifier: | JB/121/366/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

2

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

366

Info in main headings field

Inessentialia? Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F36? / G24

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in