JB/121/397/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/121/397/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/397/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/397/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>I dwell the more particularly on this interpretation my<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Lord, because this exclusive <add>setting aside</add> of all varnishes, is what<lb/>
 
I take to be the true picture of his Grace's conduct – the<lb/>
 
<unclear>plain</unclear> and genuine <unclear>secret</unclear> his <unclear>way</unclear> of the business the history<lb/>
 
of the workings of mind.</p>
<p>This too by giving the true history of the business<lb/>
gives the true <add>fair</add> and unexaggerated picture of the mischief<lb/>
resulting from such conduct and <del>of</del> the true<lb/>
measure of the demand for <del>of</del> punishment</p>
<p>I say nothing about blocks and axes because<lb/>
I do not myself regard it as that sort<lb/>
of case which presents <add>calls</add> a demand for the use of<lb/>
blocks and axes.</p>
<p>If it were a conspiracy to overthrow the constitution<lb/>
by force to maintain <add>uphold</add> the things by force<lb/>
or <del>their</del> contempt put by them in the authority of<lb/>
Parliament – yes.</p>
<p>But it is not a conspiracy to overthrow the<lb/>
constitution by force:  it is no more than a conspiracy<lb/>
to undermine it by fraud:  and that only in<lb/>
the individual instance in question, and very likely<lb/>
without any distinct view of the use that might<lb/>
be made of it in the way of precedent to <del>assu</del> <unclear>excuse</unclear><lb/>
a <gap/> power in other future instances.</p>
<p>But, whether intended or no to be made use of as<lb/>
a precedent – is it or is it not likely – as occasion<lb/>
serves – to be so employed – <del>cop</del> if nothing be done to prevent<lb/>
it?  It will be difficult, I think to answer<lb/>
otherwise than in the affirmative.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2023

'Click Here To Edit

I dwell the more particularly on this interpretation my
Lord, because this exclusive setting aside of all varnishes, is what
I take to be the true picture of his Grace's conduct – the
plain and genuine secret his way of the business the history
of the workings of mind.

This too by giving the true history of the business
gives the true fair and unexaggerated picture of the mischief
resulting from such conduct and of the true
measure of the demand for of punishment

I say nothing about blocks and axes because
I do not myself regard it as that sort
of case which presents calls a demand for the use of
blocks and axes.

If it were a conspiracy to overthrow the constitution
by force to maintain uphold the things by force
or their contempt put by them in the authority of
Parliament – yes.

But it is not a conspiracy to overthrow the
constitution by force: it is no more than a conspiracy
to undermine it by fraud: and that only in
the individual instance in question, and very likely
without any distinct view of the use that might
be made of it in the way of precedent to assu excuse
a power in other future instances.

But, whether intended or no to be made use of as
a precedent – is it or is it not likely – as occasion
serves – to be so employed – cop if nothing be done to prevent
it? It will be difficult, I think to answer
otherwise than in the affirmative.


Identifier: | JB/121/397/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

397

Info in main headings field

Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

CW 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

C. Abbit Lees

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in