JB/121/460/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/460/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/121/460/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/460/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/460/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->8 Apr. 1802<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Dispensing power</head></p>
 
<p>act without an object – not even the Duke of Portland:<lb/>
 
not even the man who is weak enough<lb/>
 
to think or least <del>to</del> which is an equal proof<lb/>
of weakness to pretend <add>profess</add> to think that Parliament<lb/>
acts without an object.  That he had an object<lb/>
and that object was to defeat the known object of<lb/>
<add>a law of</add> Parliament is <del>expressed plainly enough</del> <add>is plain enough</add> to look no<lb/>
further than this one letter by what further pretences<lb/>
and by what further acts, such as they are <add>were</add> that<lb/>
object was to be pursued to the period of its <del><gap/></del><lb/>
attainment is seen in those subsequent letters of subsequent<lb/>
date which have already passed under review.</p>
<p>In <hi rend="underline">this</hi> letter principles were to be laid down<lb/>
principles inconsistent with the existence of the Penitentiary<lb/>
house principles repugnant to the engagements<lb/>
so long ago entered into <add>contracted</add> and so repeatedly confirmed in<lb/>
relation to that establishment, in the succeeding letters<lb/>
Your Lordship has seen those principles applied to<lb/>
practice.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2023

'Click Here To Edit

8 Apr. 1802
Dispensing power

act without an object – not even the Duke of Portland:
not even the man who is weak enough
to think or least to which is an equal proof
of weakness to pretend profess to think that Parliament
acts without an object. That he had an object
and that object was to defeat the known object of
a law of Parliament is expressed plainly enough is plain enough to look no
further than this one letter by what further pretences
and by what further acts, such as they are were that
object was to be pursued to the period of its
attainment is seen in those subsequent letters of subsequent
date which have already passed under review.

In this letter principles were to be laid down
principles inconsistent with the existence of the Penitentiary
house principles repugnant to the engagements
so long ago entered into contracted and so repeatedly confirmed in
relation to that establishment, in the succeeding letters
Your Lordship has seen those principles applied to
practice.


Identifier: | JB/121/460/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

460

Info in main headings field

Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F25

Penner

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in