JB/121/464/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/464/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/464/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/464/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->9 Apr. 1802<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Dispensing power</head></p>
 
<p>This omission in regard to the Hulk system<lb/>
 
it may be said in behalf of the Duke is a proof<lb/>
 
<del>rather of bona fides than the contrary</del> <add>rather of the absence of mala fides rathe than of the presence</add><lb/>
of it in the case of the Penitentiary System.  He<lb/>
had <add>not (says the apologist)</add> – you yourself do not suppose he had – any<lb/>
sinister <del>point to gain</del> <add>purpose to effect</add> by the supposition of the<lb/>
Hulk system – neither in fact did he suppress it:<lb/>
and yet you see according to the principles of this<lb/>
letter of his the same fate should attend the <add>old</add> System<lb/>
that <add>the Hulk system – the</add> already established <del><gap/> f</del> under an Act of Parliament and<lb/>
<add>the Penitentiary system</add> the system <add>only</add> intended to be established under another<lb/>
Act of Parliament.  Suppose illegality – suppose<lb/>
precipitancy – suppose want of clear view <add>discernment if you please.</add>  Yet this<lb/>
very want of perspicacity may in the eye of candour <add>But these very imperfections – supposing them to exist – ought</add><lb/>
<add>be received.</add> serve as evidence <add>a sign</add> of the want <add>absence</add> of mala fides.</p>
<p>My Lord I admitt the want of perspicacity <add>discernment</add><lb/>
I admitt it to a dgree of blindness – I admitt<lb/>
the perspicacity so far <del>and</del> but so far only as<lb/>
that blindness affords an indication of it <add>may be considered as a proof of it</add> – a perspicacity<lb/>
in <add>as to</add> the mode of execution – though as<lb/>
to the design <unclear>time</unclear> – (as I shall have made particular<lb/>
occasion to shew presently) – was ever more<lb/>
deliberate.  But this blindness I rely on <add>presents itself to my view</add> as<lb/>
<del>a</del> <add>among the</add> proofs of the <hi rend="underline">existence</hi> of mala fides instead of the<lb/>
absence of it.  He had no sinister point to gain in <add>by<lb/>
the</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2023

'Click Here To Edit

9 Apr. 1802
Dispensing power

This omission in regard to the Hulk system
it may be said in behalf of the Duke is a proof
rather of bona fides than the contrary rather of the absence of mala fides rathe than of the presence
of it in the case of the Penitentiary System. He
had not (says the apologist) – you yourself do not suppose he had – any
sinister point to gain purpose to effect by the supposition of the
Hulk system – neither in fact did he suppress it:
and yet you see according to the principles of this
letter of his the same fate should attend the old System
that the Hulk system – the already established f under an Act of Parliament and
the Penitentiary system the system only intended to be established under another
Act of Parliament. Suppose illegality – suppose
precipitancy – suppose want of clear view discernment if you please. Yet this
very want of perspicacity may in the eye of candour But these very imperfections – supposing them to exist – ought
be received. serve as evidence a sign of the want absence of mala fides.

My Lord I admitt the want of perspicacity discernment
I admitt it to a dgree of blindness – I admitt
the perspicacity so far and but so far only as
that blindness affords an indication of it may be considered as a proof of it – a perspicacity
in as to the mode of execution – though as
to the design time – (as I shall have made particular
occasion to shew presently) – was ever more
deliberate. But this blindness I rely on presents itself to my view as
a among the proofs of the existence of mala fides instead of the
absence of it. He had no sinister point to gain in by
the


Identifier: | JB/121/464/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

1

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

464

Info in main headings field

Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in