JB/121/472/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/472/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/472/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/472/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->12 Apr. 1802<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Dispensing favor</p>
 
<p>King had been not unfaithful:  his <del><gap/> practical<lb/>
 
the <gap/></del> practical indications <add>recommendations</add> pointed to the lowest degree<lb/>
above 0 which at that time could be found:<lb/>
which with the stock of information, he was at that time<lb/>
in possession of, could be found:  <del>at</del> while his theory,<lb/>
besides furnishing a <add>the</add> <unclear>pretence</unclear> for the reduction <add>reducing</add> of the<lb/>
number <add>at the first stroke</add> so much below the fair one, laid a foundation<lb/>
for the further reductions which upon further <add>grew out of further</add><lb/>
consultation it afterwards experienced.</p>
<p>If indeed the 2150, thus recommended to be given,<lb/>
had been actually given, <add>the complexion of</add> the case would have worn <add>been<lb/>
in some respects different:</add> a different complexion:  of the two crimes – the<lb/>
<del>as an</del> assumption of <del>some</del> legislative power, and the exercise<lb/>
of it, the latter would have been either done away<lb/>
or at any rate <add>the offer of it</add> reduced.  I, <del>as an individual</del> <add>in my individual capacity</add> should<lb/>
<del>have been</del> not have complained:  the only mischief done<lb/>
would have been <add>the wound to the constitution –</add> the contempt put upon the authority<lb/>
of Parliament.  But all this – Your Lordship sees –<lb/>
is but supposition:  the fact is the number given<lb/>
me was – not the 2150, but the <del>9</del> <add>cypher</add> at the end of it.</p>
<p>The evidence – the written part of it I mean<lb/>
consists not simply of this one letter;  but of<lb/>
the series of communications <add>documents</add>, of which on the part<lb/>
of the Secretary of State's office, this letter is <add>was</add> the first.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2023

'Click Here To Edit

12 Apr. 1802
Dispensing favor

King had been not unfaithful: his practical
the
practical indications recommendations pointed to the lowest degree
above 0 which at that time could be found:
which with the stock of information, he was at that time
in possession of, could be found: at while his theory,
besides furnishing a the pretence for the reduction reducing of the
number at the first stroke so much below the fair one, laid a foundation
for the further reductions which upon further grew out of further
consultation it afterwards experienced.

If indeed the 2150, thus recommended to be given,
had been actually given, the complexion of the case would have worn been
in some respects different:
a different complexion: of the two crimes – the
as an assumption of some legislative power, and the exercise
of it, the latter would have been either done away
or at any rate the offer of it reduced. I, as an individual in my individual capacity should
have been not have complained: the only mischief done
would have been the wound to the constitution – the contempt put upon the authority
of Parliament. But all this – Your Lordship sees –
is but supposition: the fact is the number given
me was – not the 2150, but the 9 cypher at the end of it.

The evidence – the written part of it I mean
consists not simply of this one letter; but of
the series of communications documents, of which on the part
of the Secretary of State's office, this letter is was the first.



Identifier: | JB/121/472/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

2 continued

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

472

Info in main headings field

Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D5

Penner

Watermarks

CW 1799

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

C. Abbit Lees

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in