JB/169/125/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/169/125/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/169/125/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/169/125/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/169/125/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>My Lord</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>The <del>(other)</del> sheet which is in a<lb/>
 
hand different <del>from my own</del> <add>hand</add> contains a<lb/>
 
prospectus of my plan as it stood <del>a little</del><lb/>
 
about a year ago;  since which <del><gap/> it</del> <add>a number of</add><lb/>
<del>has <add>unavoidably</add> and again <add>a variety of</add> considerable</del> alterations have<lb/>
unavoidably taken place in it.</p>
<p>As the distinction between the penal branch<lb/>
of the law and the civil is so familiar, I had<lb/>
all along taken for granted that the line of separation<lb/>
between those objects might be traced within<lb/>
the compass of a page or two.  When I came<lb/>
to make the experiment, I found that this <add>such</add> separation<lb/>
could scarcely be said as yet to exist:<lb/>
and that to set up one of my own in such<lb/>
manner as to <del><gap/></del> answer as nearly as<lb/>
possible the purposes for which the <add>verbal</add> distinction<lb/>
<add>in words</add> is made, would involve a multitude of problems<lb/>
of the most intricate kind which nobody <del>had</del> <add>seemed</add><lb/>
hitherto <del>seems</del> to have thought of solving.<lb/>
I found in short that the substance <add>body matter</add> of the<lb/>
penal law was <add>almost</add> inextricably <del><gap/></del> <add><del>contained</del> interwoven</add> with the<lb/>
<add>civil</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:47, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

My Lord

The (other) sheet which is in a
hand different from my own hand contains a
prospectus of my plan as it stood a little
about a year ago; since which it a number of
has unavoidably and again a variety of considerable alterations have
unavoidably taken place in it.

As the distinction between the penal branch
of the law and the civil is so familiar, I had
all along taken for granted that the line of separation
between those objects might be traced within
the compass of a page or two. When I came
to make the experiment, I found that this such separation
could scarcely be said as yet to exist:
and that to set up one of my own in such
manner as to answer as nearly as
possible the purposes for which the verbal distinction
in words is made, would involve a multitude of problems
of the most intricate kind which nobody had seemed
hitherto seems to have thought of solving.
I found in short that the substance body matter of the
penal law was almost inextricably contained interwoven with the
civil


Identifier: | JB/169/125/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

125

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 426, vol. 3

ID Number

56945

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in