★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/169/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/169/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><note><!-- pencil -->Vaughan</note></p> | |||
<p>It is a bad sign when a man holds communication<lb/> | <p>It is a bad sign when a man holds communication<lb/> | ||
with the enemy | with the enemy – So any one <del>would</del> <add>might</add><lb/> | ||
say, <add>and with reason,</add> who knew so much of the <add>matter</add> and no more.<lb/> | say, <add>and with reason,</add> who knew so much of the <add>matter</add> and no more.<lb/> | ||
But why a bad sign? Because it looks as<lb/> | But why a bad sign? Because it looks as<lb/> | ||
if the object of the communication were, the same<lb/> | |||
with that of the enemy, to do mischief to the<lb/> | with that of the enemy, to do mischief to the<lb/> | ||
country– But where is the badness of the sign,<lb/> | |||
when no sooner do we know of the communication<lb/> | when no sooner do we know of the communication,<lb/> | ||
than we know the <add>< | than we know the <del>prospect and the</del> <add><del>sole</del> object & the sole</add> <lb/> | ||
object of it, and that | object of it, and that that object <del>of it was no</del><add>neither was<lb/> | ||
nor could be, any</add> other than to save the country instead of injuring<lb/> | |||
it.</p> | it.</p> | ||
<p>By how much would the country have been<lb/> | |||
the better, if instead of this <del>seeking</del> <add>volunteering himself</add> to prevent<lb/> | |||
the enemy from invading it, he had <add>cautiously</add> lain by<lb/> | |||
and for want of the advice <add><del><gap/> intelligence</del></add> in question, suffered<lb/> | |||
them to have carried their <del>works</del> <add>projects</add> into effect?</p> | |||
<p>Which is the best subject, he who at the hazard<lb/> | |||
of every thing <add>that is or ought to be done to a man,</add> <del>that or done to him</del>, exerts himself<lb/> | |||
to save his country, and that in a way bidding<lb/> | |||
as fair as possible for efficacy, or <del>him</del> he who<lb/> | |||
for want of such exertions chooses to let the<lb/> | |||
country take its chance? I know who is the more<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">prudent</hi> man of the two – taking selfishness and<lb/> | |||
nothing else into the account of p<hi rend="underline">prudence</hi>– <add>I</add><lb/> | |||
know who <add>in this sense</add> is the more <hi rend="underline">prudent</hi> man – the <add><del><gap/></del></add> treatment<lb/> | |||
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan has met with shews it but too plainly – but<lb/> | |||
what I ask is – who is the most public spirited man, the most loyal subject?</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
Vaughan
It is a bad sign when a man holds communication
with the enemy – So any one would might
say, and with reason, who knew so much of the matter and no more.
But why a bad sign? Because it looks as
if the object of the communication were, the same
with that of the enemy, to do mischief to the
country– But where is the badness of the sign,
when no sooner do we know of the communication,
than we know the prospect and the sole object & the sole
object of it, and that that object of it was noneither was
nor could be, any other than to save the country instead of injuring
it.
By how much would the country have been
the better, if instead of this seeking volunteering himself to prevent
the enemy from invading it, he had cautiously lain by
and for want of the advice intelligence in question, suffered
them to have carried their works projects into effect?
Which is the best subject, he who at the hazard
of every thing that is or ought to be done to a man, that or done to him, exerts himself
to save his country, and that in a way bidding
as fair as possible for efficacy, or him he who
for want of such exertions chooses to let the
country take its chance? I know who is the more
prudent man of the two – taking selfishness and
nothing else into the account of pprudence– I
know who in this sense is the more prudent man – the treatment
Mr Vaughan has met with shews it but too plainly – but
what I ask is – who is the most public spirited man, the most loyal subject?
Identifier: | JB/169/238/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
169 |
|||
238 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
57058 |
|||