JB/169/238/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/169/238/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/169/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/169/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><note><!-- pencil -->Vaughan</note></p>
<p>It is a bad sign when a man holds communication<lb/>
<p>It is a bad sign when a man holds communication<lb/>
with the enemy &#x2014; So any one <del>would</del> <add>might</add><lb/>
with the enemy So any one <del>would</del> <add>might</add><lb/>
say, <add>and with reason,</add> who knew so much of the <add>matter</add> and no more.<lb/>
say, <add>and with reason,</add> who knew so much of the <add>matter</add> and no more.<lb/>
But why a  bad sign? Because it looks as<lb/>
But why a  bad sign? Because it looks as<lb/>
of the object of the communication were, the same<lb/>
if the object of the communication were, the same<lb/>
with that of the enemy, to do mischief to the<lb/>
with that of the enemy, to do mischief to the<lb/>
country &#x2014; But where is the badness of the sign,<lb/>
country– But where is the badness of the sign,<lb/>
when no sooner do we know of the communication<lb/>
when no sooner do we know of the communication,<lb/>
than we know the <add><gap/> object &amp; the sole</add>  <del>purpose and the</del><lb/>
than we know the <del>prospect and the</del> <add><del>sole</del> object &amp; the sole</add>  <lb/>
object of it, and that <gap/> object <del>of it was no</del><add>neither was</add><lb/>
object of it, and that that object <del>of it was no</del><add>neither was<lb/>
<add>nor could he, any</add> other than to save the country instead of injuring<lb/>
nor could be, any</add> other than to save the country instead of injuring<lb/>
it.</p>
it.</p>
<p>By how much would the country have been<lb/>
<p>By how much would the country have been<lb/>
the better, if instead of this <add>volunteering himself</add> <del>seeking</del> to present<lb/>
the better, if instead of this <del>seeking</del> <add>volunteering himself</add> to prevent<lb/>
the enemy from invading it, he had <add>cautiously</add> lain by<lb/>
the enemy from invading it, he had <add>cautiously</add> lain by<lb/>
and for want of the advice <add><del><gap/> intelligence</del></add> in question, suffered<lb/>
and for want of the advice <add><del><gap/> intelligence</del></add> in question, suffered<lb/>
them to have carried their <del>works</del> <add>projects</add> into effect?</p>
them to have carried their <del>works</del> <add>projects</add> into effect?</p>
<p>Which is the best subject, he who at the hazard<lb/>
<p>Which is the best subject, he who at the hazard<lb/>
of every thing <add>that is or ought to be done to a man,</add> <del>that <gap/> done to him</del>, exists himself<lb/>
of every thing <add>that is or ought to be done to a man,</add> <del>that or done to him</del>, exerts himself<lb/>
to save his country, and that in a way bidding<lb/>
to save his country, and that in a way bidding<lb/>
as fair as possible for efficacy, or <del>him</del> he who<lb/>
as fair as possible for efficacy, or <del>him</del> he who<lb/>
for want of such exertions <gap/> to let the<lb/>
for want of such exertions chooses to let the<lb/>
country take its chance? I know who is the <note><del>knowing the danger</del><lb/>
country take its chance? I know who is the more<lb/>
<del><gap/><add>still</add> by, and lets</del></note><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">prudent</hi> man of the two taking selfishness and<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">prudent</hi> man of the two, taking selfishness and<lb/>
nothing else into the account of p<hi rend="underline">prudence</hi><add>I</add><lb/>
nothing else into the account of p<hi rend="underline">rud</hi>ence &#x2014; <del><gap/></del><add>I</add><lb/>
know who <add>in this sense</add> is the more <hi rend="underline">prudent</hi> man the <add><del><gap/></del></add> treatment<lb/>
know who <add>in this seems</add> is the more <hi rend="underline">prudent</hi> man &#x2014; the treatment<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan has met with shews it but too plainly but<lb/>
Mr Vaughan has met with sh<gap/> at too plainly &#x2014; but<lb/>
what I ask is who is the most public spirited man, the most loyal subject?</p>
what <gap/> <gap/> is &#x2014; who is the most public spirited man, the most loyal subject?</p>
 
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:47, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Vaughan

It is a bad sign when a man holds communication
with the enemy – So any one would might
say, and with reason, who knew so much of the matter and no more.
But why a bad sign? Because it looks as
if the object of the communication were, the same
with that of the enemy, to do mischief to the
country– But where is the badness of the sign,
when no sooner do we know of the communication,
than we know the prospect and the sole object & the sole
object of it, and that that object of it was noneither was
nor could be, any
other than to save the country instead of injuring
it.

By how much would the country have been
the better, if instead of this seeking volunteering himself to prevent
the enemy from invading it, he had cautiously lain by
and for want of the advice intelligence in question, suffered
them to have carried their works projects into effect?

Which is the best subject, he who at the hazard
of every thing that is or ought to be done to a man, that or done to him, exerts himself
to save his country, and that in a way bidding
as fair as possible for efficacy, or him he who
for want of such exertions chooses to let the
country take its chance? I know who is the more
prudent man of the two – taking selfishness and
nothing else into the account of pprudenceI
know who in this sense is the more prudent man – the treatment
Mr Vaughan has met with shews it but too plainly – but
what I ask is – who is the most public spirited man, the most loyal subject?


Identifier: | JB/169/238/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

238

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

57058

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in